You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tomee.apache.org by David Blevins <da...@gmail.com> on 2013/11/12 02:47:13 UTC
[VOTE] TomEE 1.6.0 / OpenEJB 4.6.0 (staging-120)
Ok! All dependent projects are up for votes or completed voting.
I rolled a new set of binaries with Mark's proposed OpenJPA 2.3.0 binaries. I ran these through the TCK and all is green. Looks like we're good to go.
Maven Repo:
- https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-120/
Binaries:
- https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-120/tomee-1.6.0/
Tag:
- https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee/tomee/tags/tomee-1.6.0/
The vote will go for 72 hours. Any -1s in this time will be seen as a positive. The vote will keep going even if a -1 happens so we can collect all possible feedback and surface *all* issues.
If we have to reroll and revote, we will fix all -1 issues and push new binaries and start a new 72 hour vote. If you didn't look at the first set of binaries and feel compelled to vote -1, this will be seen as a negative. Consider offering each voter an hour per vote on a task of their choosing to make up for their lost time. :)
-David
Re: [VOTE] TomEE 1.6.0 / OpenEJB 4.6.0 (staging-120)
Posted by Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>.
Here is my +1
Only ran a full build locally.
JLouis
2013/11/12 David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
> Ok! All dependent projects are up for votes or completed voting.
>
> I rolled a new set of binaries with Mark's proposed OpenJPA 2.3.0
> binaries. I ran these through the TCK and all is green. Looks like we're
> good to go.
>
> Maven Repo:
>
> - https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-120/
>
> Binaries:
>
> - https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-120/tomee-1.6.0/
>
> Tag:
>
> - https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee/tomee/tags/tomee-1.6.0/
>
>
> The vote will go for 72 hours. Any -1s in this time will be seen as a
> positive. The vote will keep going even if a -1 happens so we can collect
> all possible feedback and surface *all* issues.
>
> If we have to reroll and revote, we will fix all -1 issues and push new
> binaries and start a new 72 hour vote. If you didn't look at the first set
> of binaries and feel compelled to vote -1, this will be seen as a negative.
> Consider offering each voter an hour per vote on a task of their choosing
> to make up for their lost time. :)
>
>
> -David
>
>
--
Jean-Louis
Re: [VOTE] TomEE 1.6.0 / OpenEJB 4.6.0 (staging-120) -- CANCELLED
Posted by David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>.
There's a -1 on the OpenJPA vote. We would have needed that vote to pass to use those binaries in our release.
The -1 wasn't serious and we still have a chance to come through for Alex, Tim, Judah and crew, so I've pulled the OpenJPA tag in so we can make our own binaries from it.
Builds are up and TCK us running. If all looks good, I'll put them up for a vote.
Thanks to everyone who took the time to review these binaries. We've never had so many +1 votes from non-committers before. Really very awesome.
-David
On Nov 17, 2013, at 12:04 AM, David Blevins <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Technically its 72 hours is already up and there are no votes from the PMC. Just 3 non-binding +1s from us.
>
> Did my best to encourage activity of any kind. If I don't see any by tomorrow, I might try spinning up some plan B binaries with OpenJPA pulled in.
>
> -David
>
> On Nov 16, 2013, at 10:16 PM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Of course.
>> AFAIR, OpenJPA 2.3.0 is under vote currently, so it should be ok on Monday
>> or so.
>>
>> JLouis
>>
>>
>> 2013/11/16 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
>>
>>> @jl: we cant while openjpa vote didnt pass
>>> Le 16 nov. 2013 16:17, "Jean-Louis MONTEIRO" <je...@gmail.com> a écrit
>>> :
>>>
>>>> David has been out the whole week to give talks to Devoxx BE.
>>>> As far as I know, I gonna get back late on Monday.
>>>>
>>>> If needed, I can follow the release process tomorrow or on Monday
>>> morning.
>>>>
>>>> JLouis
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2013/11/16 Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>
>>>>
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>> updated my test suite - works fine
>>>>>
>>>>> -Matthias
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> LieGrue,
>>>>>> strub
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ________________________________
>>>>>>> From: David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> To: "dev@tomee.apache.org" <de...@tomee.apache.org>
>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, 12 November 2013, 2:47
>>>>>>> Subject: [VOTE] TomEE 1.6.0 / OpenEJB 4.6.0 (staging-120)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ok! All dependent projects are up for votes or completed voting.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I rolled a new set of binaries with Mark's proposed OpenJPA 2.3.0
>>>>>> binaries. I ran these through the TCK and all is green. Looks like
>>>>> we're
>>>>>> good to go.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Maven Repo:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -
>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-120/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Binaries:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-120/tomee-1.6.0/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Tag:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee/tomee/tags/tomee-1.6.0/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The vote will go for 72 hours. Any -1s in this time will be seen
>>> as a
>>>>>> positive. The vote will keep going even if a -1 happens so we can
>>>>> collect
>>>>>> all possible feedback and surface *all* issues.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If we have to reroll and revote, we will fix all -1 issues and push
>>>> new
>>>>>> binaries and start a new 72 hour vote. If you didn't look at the
>>> first
>>>>> set
>>>>>> of binaries and feel compelled to vote -1, this will be seen as a
>>>>>> negative. Consider offering each voter an hour per vote on a task of
>>>>> their
>>>>>> choosing to make up for their lost time. :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -David
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>>>>
>>>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Jean-Louis
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Jean-Louis
>
Re: [VOTE] TomEE 1.6.0 / OpenEJB 4.6.0 (staging-120)
Posted by David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>.
Technically its 72 hours is already up and there are no votes from the PMC. Just 3 non-binding +1s from us.
Did my best to encourage activity of any kind. If I don't see any by tomorrow, I might try spinning up some plan B binaries with OpenJPA pulled in.
-David
On Nov 16, 2013, at 10:16 PM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Of course.
> AFAIR, OpenJPA 2.3.0 is under vote currently, so it should be ok on Monday
> or so.
>
> JLouis
>
>
> 2013/11/16 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
>
>> @jl: we cant while openjpa vote didnt pass
>> Le 16 nov. 2013 16:17, "Jean-Louis MONTEIRO" <je...@gmail.com> a écrit
>> :
>>
>>> David has been out the whole week to give talks to Devoxx BE.
>>> As far as I know, I gonna get back late on Monday.
>>>
>>> If needed, I can follow the release process tomorrow or on Monday
>> morning.
>>>
>>> JLouis
>>>
>>>
>>> 2013/11/16 Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>
>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> updated my test suite - works fine
>>>>
>>>> -Matthias
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>> LieGrue,
>>>>> strub
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> ________________________________
>>>>>> From: David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> To: "dev@tomee.apache.org" <de...@tomee.apache.org>
>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, 12 November 2013, 2:47
>>>>>> Subject: [VOTE] TomEE 1.6.0 / OpenEJB 4.6.0 (staging-120)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ok! All dependent projects are up for votes or completed voting.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I rolled a new set of binaries with Mark's proposed OpenJPA 2.3.0
>>>>> binaries. I ran these through the TCK and all is green. Looks like
>>>> we're
>>>>> good to go.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Maven Repo:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -
>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-120/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Binaries:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-120/tomee-1.6.0/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Tag:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee/tomee/tags/tomee-1.6.0/
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The vote will go for 72 hours. Any -1s in this time will be seen
>> as a
>>>>> positive. The vote will keep going even if a -1 happens so we can
>>>> collect
>>>>> all possible feedback and surface *all* issues.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If we have to reroll and revote, we will fix all -1 issues and push
>>> new
>>>>> binaries and start a new 72 hour vote. If you didn't look at the
>> first
>>>> set
>>>>> of binaries and feel compelled to vote -1, this will be seen as a
>>>>> negative. Consider offering each voter an hour per vote on a task of
>>>> their
>>>>> choosing to make up for their lost time. :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -David
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>>>
>>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jean-Louis
>>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Jean-Louis
Re: [VOTE] TomEE 1.6.0 / OpenEJB 4.6.0 (staging-120)
Posted by Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>.
Of course.
AFAIR, OpenJPA 2.3.0 is under vote currently, so it should be ok on Monday
or so.
JLouis
2013/11/16 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
> @jl: we cant while openjpa vote didnt pass
> Le 16 nov. 2013 16:17, "Jean-Louis MONTEIRO" <je...@gmail.com> a écrit
> :
>
> > David has been out the whole week to give talks to Devoxx BE.
> > As far as I know, I gonna get back late on Monday.
> >
> > If needed, I can follow the release process tomorrow or on Monday
> morning.
> >
> > JLouis
> >
> >
> > 2013/11/16 Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > updated my test suite - works fine
> > >
> > > -Matthias
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > LieGrue,
> > > > strub
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >________________________________
> > > > > From: David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
> > > > >To: "dev@tomee.apache.org" <de...@tomee.apache.org>
> > > > >Sent: Tuesday, 12 November 2013, 2:47
> > > > >Subject: [VOTE] TomEE 1.6.0 / OpenEJB 4.6.0 (staging-120)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >Ok! All dependent projects are up for votes or completed voting.
> > > > >
> > > > >I rolled a new set of binaries with Mark's proposed OpenJPA 2.3.0
> > > > binaries. I ran these through the TCK and all is green. Looks like
> > > we're
> > > > good to go.
> > > > >
> > > > >Maven Repo:
> > > > >
> > > > >-
> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-120/
> > > > >
> > > > >Binaries:
> > > > >
> > > > >-
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-120/tomee-1.6.0/
> > > > >
> > > > >Tag:
> > > > >
> > > > >- https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee/tomee/tags/tomee-1.6.0/
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >The vote will go for 72 hours. Any -1s in this time will be seen
> as a
> > > > positive. The vote will keep going even if a -1 happens so we can
> > > collect
> > > > all possible feedback and surface *all* issues.
> > > > >
> > > > >If we have to reroll and revote, we will fix all -1 issues and push
> > new
> > > > binaries and start a new 72 hour vote. If you didn't look at the
> first
> > > set
> > > > of binaries and feel compelled to vote -1, this will be seen as a
> > > > negative. Consider offering each voter an hour per vote on a task of
> > > their
> > > > choosing to make up for their lost time. :)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >-David
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > >
> > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Jean-Louis
> >
>
--
Jean-Louis
Re: [VOTE] TomEE 1.6.0 / OpenEJB 4.6.0 (staging-120)
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
@jl: we cant while openjpa vote didnt pass
Le 16 nov. 2013 16:17, "Jean-Louis MONTEIRO" <je...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> David has been out the whole week to give talks to Devoxx BE.
> As far as I know, I gonna get back late on Monday.
>
> If needed, I can follow the release process tomorrow or on Monday morning.
>
> JLouis
>
>
> 2013/11/16 Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>
>
> > +1
> >
> > updated my test suite - works fine
> >
> > -Matthias
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > LieGrue,
> > > strub
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > >________________________________
> > > > From: David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
> > > >To: "dev@tomee.apache.org" <de...@tomee.apache.org>
> > > >Sent: Tuesday, 12 November 2013, 2:47
> > > >Subject: [VOTE] TomEE 1.6.0 / OpenEJB 4.6.0 (staging-120)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >Ok! All dependent projects are up for votes or completed voting.
> > > >
> > > >I rolled a new set of binaries with Mark's proposed OpenJPA 2.3.0
> > > binaries. I ran these through the TCK and all is green. Looks like
> > we're
> > > good to go.
> > > >
> > > >Maven Repo:
> > > >
> > > >-
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-120/
> > > >
> > > >Binaries:
> > > >
> > > >-
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-120/tomee-1.6.0/
> > > >
> > > >Tag:
> > > >
> > > >- https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee/tomee/tags/tomee-1.6.0/
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >The vote will go for 72 hours. Any -1s in this time will be seen as a
> > > positive. The vote will keep going even if a -1 happens so we can
> > collect
> > > all possible feedback and surface *all* issues.
> > > >
> > > >If we have to reroll and revote, we will fix all -1 issues and push
> new
> > > binaries and start a new 72 hour vote. If you didn't look at the first
> > set
> > > of binaries and feel compelled to vote -1, this will be seen as a
> > > negative. Consider offering each voter an hour per vote on a task of
> > their
> > > choosing to make up for their lost time. :)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >-David
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> >
> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Jean-Louis
>
Re: [VOTE] TomEE 1.6.0 / OpenEJB 4.6.0 (staging-120)
Posted by Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>.
David has been out the whole week to give talks to Devoxx BE.
As far as I know, I gonna get back late on Monday.
If needed, I can follow the release process tomorrow or on Monday morning.
JLouis
2013/11/16 Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>
> +1
>
> updated my test suite - works fine
>
> -Matthias
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > +1
> >
> > LieGrue,
> > strub
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > >________________________________
> > > From: David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
> > >To: "dev@tomee.apache.org" <de...@tomee.apache.org>
> > >Sent: Tuesday, 12 November 2013, 2:47
> > >Subject: [VOTE] TomEE 1.6.0 / OpenEJB 4.6.0 (staging-120)
> > >
> > >
> > >Ok! All dependent projects are up for votes or completed voting.
> > >
> > >I rolled a new set of binaries with Mark's proposed OpenJPA 2.3.0
> > binaries. I ran these through the TCK and all is green. Looks like
> we're
> > good to go.
> > >
> > >Maven Repo:
> > >
> > >-
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-120/
> > >
> > >Binaries:
> > >
> > >- https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-120/tomee-1.6.0/
> > >
> > >Tag:
> > >
> > >- https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee/tomee/tags/tomee-1.6.0/
> > >
> > >
> > >The vote will go for 72 hours. Any -1s in this time will be seen as a
> > positive. The vote will keep going even if a -1 happens so we can
> collect
> > all possible feedback and surface *all* issues.
> > >
> > >If we have to reroll and revote, we will fix all -1 issues and push new
> > binaries and start a new 72 hour vote. If you didn't look at the first
> set
> > of binaries and feel compelled to vote -1, this will be seen as a
> > negative. Consider offering each voter an hour per vote on a task of
> their
> > choosing to make up for their lost time. :)
> > >
> > >
> > >-David
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>
--
Jean-Louis
Re: [VOTE] TomEE 1.6.0 / OpenEJB 4.6.0 (staging-120)
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
+1
updated my test suite - works fine
-Matthias
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de> wrote:
>
>
> +1
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
>
>
> >________________________________
> > From: David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
> >To: "dev@tomee.apache.org" <de...@tomee.apache.org>
> >Sent: Tuesday, 12 November 2013, 2:47
> >Subject: [VOTE] TomEE 1.6.0 / OpenEJB 4.6.0 (staging-120)
> >
> >
> >Ok! All dependent projects are up for votes or completed voting.
> >
> >I rolled a new set of binaries with Mark's proposed OpenJPA 2.3.0
> binaries. I ran these through the TCK and all is green. Looks like we're
> good to go.
> >
> >Maven Repo:
> >
> >- https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-120/
> >
> >Binaries:
> >
> >- https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-120/tomee-1.6.0/
> >
> >Tag:
> >
> >- https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee/tomee/tags/tomee-1.6.0/
> >
> >
> >The vote will go for 72 hours. Any -1s in this time will be seen as a
> positive. The vote will keep going even if a -1 happens so we can collect
> all possible feedback and surface *all* issues.
> >
> >If we have to reroll and revote, we will fix all -1 issues and push new
> binaries and start a new 72 hour vote. If you didn't look at the first set
> of binaries and feel compelled to vote -1, this will be seen as a
> negative. Consider offering each voter an hour per vote on a task of their
> choosing to make up for their lost time. :)
> >
> >
> >-David
> >
> >
> >
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Re: [VOTE] TomEE 1.6.0 / OpenEJB 4.6.0 (staging-120)
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
Hi
I think we'll wait openjpa release (if i didnt miss it) to make it official
and push binaries on apache servers and repo1
Le 15 nov. 2013 20:39, "Alex The Rocker" <al...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> Looks like we are past 72 hours since the vote for TomEE 1.6.0 final has
> been launched.
>
> What's the next step ?
>
> How long is it before TomEE 1.6.0 final download link will be added to
> http://tomee.apache.org/downloads.html page?
>
> Thanks,
> Alex.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > +1
> >
> > LieGrue,
> > strub
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > >________________________________
> > > From: David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
> > >To: "dev@tomee.apache.org" <de...@tomee.apache.org>
> > >Sent: Tuesday, 12 November 2013, 2:47
> > >Subject: [VOTE] TomEE 1.6.0 / OpenEJB 4.6.0 (staging-120)
> > >
> > >
> > >Ok! All dependent projects are up for votes or completed voting.
> > >
> > >I rolled a new set of binaries with Mark's proposed OpenJPA 2.3.0
> > binaries. I ran these through the TCK and all is green. Looks like
> we're
> > good to go.
> > >
> > >Maven Repo:
> > >
> > >-
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-120/
> > >
> > >Binaries:
> > >
> > >- https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-120/tomee-1.6.0/
> > >
> > >Tag:
> > >
> > >- https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee/tomee/tags/tomee-1.6.0/
> > >
> > >
> > >The vote will go for 72 hours. Any -1s in this time will be seen as a
> > positive. The vote will keep going even if a -1 happens so we can
> collect
> > all possible feedback and surface *all* issues.
> > >
> > >If we have to reroll and revote, we will fix all -1 issues and push new
> > binaries and start a new 72 hour vote. If you didn't look at the first
> set
> > of binaries and feel compelled to vote -1, this will be seen as a
> > negative. Consider offering each voter an hour per vote on a task of
> their
> > choosing to make up for their lost time. :)
> > >
> > >
> > >-David
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] TomEE 1.6.0 / OpenEJB 4.6.0 (staging-120)
Posted by Alex The Rocker <al...@gmail.com>.
Hello,
Looks like we are past 72 hours since the vote for TomEE 1.6.0 final has
been launched.
What's the next step ?
How long is it before TomEE 1.6.0 final download link will be added to
http://tomee.apache.org/downloads.html page?
Thanks,
Alex.
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de> wrote:
>
>
> +1
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
>
>
> >________________________________
> > From: David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
> >To: "dev@tomee.apache.org" <de...@tomee.apache.org>
> >Sent: Tuesday, 12 November 2013, 2:47
> >Subject: [VOTE] TomEE 1.6.0 / OpenEJB 4.6.0 (staging-120)
> >
> >
> >Ok! All dependent projects are up for votes or completed voting.
> >
> >I rolled a new set of binaries with Mark's proposed OpenJPA 2.3.0
> binaries. I ran these through the TCK and all is green. Looks like we're
> good to go.
> >
> >Maven Repo:
> >
> >- https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-120/
> >
> >Binaries:
> >
> >- https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-120/tomee-1.6.0/
> >
> >Tag:
> >
> >- https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee/tomee/tags/tomee-1.6.0/
> >
> >
> >The vote will go for 72 hours. Any -1s in this time will be seen as a
> positive. The vote will keep going even if a -1 happens so we can collect
> all possible feedback and surface *all* issues.
> >
> >If we have to reroll and revote, we will fix all -1 issues and push new
> binaries and start a new 72 hour vote. If you didn't look at the first set
> of binaries and feel compelled to vote -1, this will be seen as a
> negative. Consider offering each voter an hour per vote on a task of their
> choosing to make up for their lost time. :)
> >
> >
> >-David
> >
> >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] TomEE 1.6.0 / OpenEJB 4.6.0 (staging-120)
Posted by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>.
+1
LieGrue,
strub
>________________________________
> From: David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
>To: "dev@tomee.apache.org" <de...@tomee.apache.org>
>Sent: Tuesday, 12 November 2013, 2:47
>Subject: [VOTE] TomEE 1.6.0 / OpenEJB 4.6.0 (staging-120)
>
>
>Ok! All dependent projects are up for votes or completed voting.
>
>I rolled a new set of binaries with Mark's proposed OpenJPA 2.3.0 binaries. I ran these through the TCK and all is green. Looks like we're good to go.
>
>Maven Repo:
>
>- https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-120/
>
>Binaries:
>
>- https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-120/tomee-1.6.0/
>
>Tag:
>
>- https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee/tomee/tags/tomee-1.6.0/
>
>
>The vote will go for 72 hours. Any -1s in this time will be seen as a positive. The vote will keep going even if a -1 happens so we can collect all possible feedback and surface *all* issues.
>
>If we have to reroll and revote, we will fix all -1 issues and push new binaries and start a new 72 hour vote. If you didn't look at the first set of binaries and feel compelled to vote -1, this will be seen as a negative. Consider offering each voter an hour per vote on a task of their choosing to make up for their lost time. :)
>
>
>-David
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] TomEE 1.6.0 / OpenEJB 4.6.0 (staging-120)
Posted by Alex The Rocker <al...@gmail.com>.
+1
No regressions found with this final TomEE+ 1.6.0 with our products, tested
on Windowses, Linuxes, AIX & Solarises (Sparc & x64).
Alex
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 8:13 AM, Jonathan Gallimore <
jonathan.gallimore@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> Jon
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 1:47 AM, David Blevins <david.blevins@gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > Ok! All dependent projects are up for votes or completed voting.
> >
> > I rolled a new set of binaries with Mark's proposed OpenJPA 2.3.0
> > binaries. I ran these through the TCK and all is green. Looks like
> we're
> > good to go.
> >
> > Maven Repo:
> >
> > -
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-120/
> >
> > Binaries:
> >
> > - https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-120/tomee-1.6.0/
> >
> > Tag:
> >
> > - https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee/tomee/tags/tomee-1.6.0/
> >
> >
> > The vote will go for 72 hours. Any -1s in this time will be seen as a
> > positive. The vote will keep going even if a -1 happens so we can
> collect
> > all possible feedback and surface *all* issues.
> >
> > If we have to reroll and revote, we will fix all -1 issues and push new
> > binaries and start a new 72 hour vote. If you didn't look at the first
> set
> > of binaries and feel compelled to vote -1, this will be seen as a
> negative.
> > Consider offering each voter an hour per vote on a task of their
> choosing
> > to make up for their lost time. :)
> >
> >
> > -David
> >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] TomEE 1.6.0 / OpenEJB 4.6.0 (staging-120)
Posted by Jonathan Gallimore <jo...@gmail.com>.
+1
Jon
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 1:47 AM, David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Ok! All dependent projects are up for votes or completed voting.
>
> I rolled a new set of binaries with Mark's proposed OpenJPA 2.3.0
> binaries. I ran these through the TCK and all is green. Looks like we're
> good to go.
>
> Maven Repo:
>
> - https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-120/
>
> Binaries:
>
> - https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-120/tomee-1.6.0/
>
> Tag:
>
> - https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee/tomee/tags/tomee-1.6.0/
>
>
> The vote will go for 72 hours. Any -1s in this time will be seen as a
> positive. The vote will keep going even if a -1 happens so we can collect
> all possible feedback and surface *all* issues.
>
> If we have to reroll and revote, we will fix all -1 issues and push new
> binaries and start a new 72 hour vote. If you didn't look at the first set
> of binaries and feel compelled to vote -1, this will be seen as a negative.
> Consider offering each voter an hour per vote on a task of their choosing
> to make up for their lost time. :)
>
>
> -David
>
>