You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to log4j-dev@logging.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2006/03/18 05:04:18 UTC

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39023] New: - o.a.l.RollingFileAppender, DailyRollingFileAppender and ExternallyRFA not compatible

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG�
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39023>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND�
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39023

           Summary: o.a.l.RollingFileAppender, DailyRollingFileAppender and
                    ExternallyRFA not compatible
           Product: Log4j
           Version: 1.3alpha
          Platform: Other
        OS/Version: other
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: Appender
        AssignedTo: log4j-dev@logging.apache.org
        ReportedBy: carnold@apache.org


The SVN HEAD currently contains facades that mimic the configuration behavior of
the log4j 1.2 RollingFileAppenders but delegate to o.a.l.rolling.RFA for
implementation.  These, while better than nothing, are not compatible with
existing RFA extensions and there is likely no way to remain compatible without
migrating the log4j 1.2 implementations forward.

Based on the volume of traffic on RFA's on the mailing list, extending the RFA's
appear to be a common practice.  Not supporting existing extensions in a 1.3
release is unacceptible in my opinion.  However, the ported RFA's should be
marked as deprecated.  The ported RFA's could also be isolated in a
log4j-obsolete.jar with other files that have been superceded and should not be
used in new code.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org


DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39023] - o.a.l.RollingFileAppender, DailyRollingFileAppender and ExternallyRFA not compatible

Posted by bu...@apache.org.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG�
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39023>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND�
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39023


carnold@apache.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED




------- Additional Comments From carnold@apache.org  2006-04-29 04:16 -------
Added tests for v1_2-branch (rev 398081) and tests and restored implementations
to trunk (rev 398080).  trunk implementations should be compatible now with
log4j 1.2, but will also have same implementation weaknesses which the previous
shim avoided.  Direct use of o.a.l.rolling.RollingFileAppender should be used
for new deployments.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org


DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39023] - o.a.l.RollingFileAppender, DailyRollingFileAppender and ExternallyRFA not compatible

Posted by bu...@apache.org.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG�
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39023>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND�
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39023


carnold@apache.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|                            |35452
              nThis|                            |




-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org


DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39023] - o.a.l.RollingFileAppender, DailyRollingFileAppender and ExternallyRFA not compatible

Posted by bu...@apache.org.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG�
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39023>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND�
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39023


carnold@apache.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jessh@ptc.com




------- Additional Comments From carnold@apache.org  2006-04-29 03:53 -------
*** Bug 38547 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org


DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39023] - o.a.l.RollingFileAppender, DailyRollingFileAppender and ExternallyRFA not compatible

Posted by bu...@apache.org.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG�
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39023>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND�
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39023





------- Additional Comments From arnauldvm@gmail.com  2007-09-04 05:13 -------
Note that RFA and DRFA are markes deprecated in 1.3 (now abandoned),
but not in 1.2. (o.a.l.rolling.RollingFileAppender is available only
in companions / extras)

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org