You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@calcite.apache.org by "Laurent Goujon (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2019/01/25 19:11:00 UTC
[jira] [Updated] (CALCITE-2803) Identify expanded IS NOT DISTINCT
FROM expression when pushing project past join
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2803?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Laurent Goujon updated CALCITE-2803:
------------------------------------
Description:
{{IS NOT DISTINCT FROM}} expressions in join condition might actually be considered as equi-join conditions, and {{RelOptUtil#splitJoinConditions()}} has support for it. But some other join related functions/rules don't.
One of them is {{ProjectJoinTransposeRule}} which tries to push project expressions below the join, but ends up modifying the join expression too by pushing complex expression below.
For example expression {{OR(AND(IS_NULL($1), IS_NULL($4)), EQUALS($1,$4))}} will be changed into {{OR(AND($3, $6), EQUALS($1, $5))}} which makes it harder/impossible for {{RelOptUtil#splitJoinConditions()}} to identify an {{IS NOT DISTINCT FROM}} equi-join condition.
was:
{{IS NOT DISTINCT FROM}} expressions in join condition might actually be considered as equi-join conditions, and {{RelOptUtil#splitJoinConditions()}} has support for it. But some other join related functions/rules don't.
One of them is {{ProjectJoinTransposeRule}} which tries to push project expressions below the join, but ends up modifying the join expression too by pushing complex expression below/
For example expression {{OR(AND(IS_NULL($1), IS_NULL($4)), EQUALS($1,$4))}} will be changed into {{OR(AND($3, $6), EQUALS($1, $5))}} which makes it harder/impossible for {{RelOptUtil#splitJoinConditions()}} to identify an {{IS NOT DISTINCT FROM}} equi-join condition.
> Identify expanded IS NOT DISTINCT FROM expression when pushing project past join
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CALCITE-2803
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2803
> Project: Calcite
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: core
> Reporter: Laurent Goujon
> Assignee: Julian Hyde
> Priority: Major
>
> {{IS NOT DISTINCT FROM}} expressions in join condition might actually be considered as equi-join conditions, and {{RelOptUtil#splitJoinConditions()}} has support for it. But some other join related functions/rules don't.
> One of them is {{ProjectJoinTransposeRule}} which tries to push project expressions below the join, but ends up modifying the join expression too by pushing complex expression below.
> For example expression {{OR(AND(IS_NULL($1), IS_NULL($4)), EQUALS($1,$4))}} will be changed into {{OR(AND($3, $6), EQUALS($1, $5))}} which makes it harder/impossible for {{RelOptUtil#splitJoinConditions()}} to identify an {{IS NOT DISTINCT FROM}} equi-join condition.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)