You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by Estrade Matthieu <es...@ifrance.com> on 2002/11/25 17:29:33 UTC
r->server->port problem
Hi,
I posted a mail about a problem with r->server->port few days ago,
I did a patch to correct this bug, but i am not sure it's a bug...
the problem was when UseCannonicalName is Off,
If i have a request on port 8095 like:
GET / HTTP/1.1
Host: mydomain.com
\n\n\r
my module is using the r->server->port
the r->server->port will be ap_default_port because of in server/core.c:
(When UseCanonicalName Off)
port = r->parsed_uri.port ? r->parsed_uri.port :
r->server->port ? r->server->port :
ap_default_port(r);
so, i did:
port = r->parsed_uri.port ? r->parsed_uri.port :
r->server->port ? r->server->port :
r->connection->local_addr->port ?
r->connection->local_addr->port :
ap_default_port(r);
I dunno if i am true or false.
it's now working in my module, it's finding r->server->port = 8095
instead of 80
regards,
Estrade Matthieu
Re: r->server->port problem
Posted by Estrade Matthieu <es...@ifrance.com>.
yes, it's a reason, and i understand well now why it's like that :)
thanks
Matthieu
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>Hmmm... I'm thinking that in between UseCanonicalName On [look up our
>name and use that] v.s. UseCanonicalName Off [trust the client] ...
>we might want UseCanonicalName Port which would not do the DNS
>lookups [trust the client for that] but would trust our idea of the port.
>
>Respectable idea?
>
>Bill
>
>At 06:38 AM 11/26/2002, Estrade Matthieu wrote:
>
>
>>heh ok, i was using the wrong stuff, i didn't know about this struct server_addrs_rec.
>>
>>what r->server->port is used for ?
>>i just would like to know what is the difference btw usecanonicalName On and Off for the r->server->port
>>why default port is sent instead of real port (socket port), i think there is a reason :)
>>
>>Jeff Trawick wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Estrade Matthieu <ma...@ifrance.com> writes:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>My module need to know the r->server->port, i mean the port of
>>>>virtual host used by the client.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>isn't that in r->server->addrs->host_port?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
>__________________________________________________
>Modem offert : 150,92 euros remboursés sur le Pack eXtense de Wanadoo !
>Haut débit à partir de 30 euros/mois : http://www.ifrance.com/_reloc/w
>
>
>
Re: r->server->port problem
Posted by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@apache.org>.
Hmmm... I'm thinking that in between UseCanonicalName On [look up our
name and use that] v.s. UseCanonicalName Off [trust the client] ...
we might want UseCanonicalName Port which would not do the DNS
lookups [trust the client for that] but would trust our idea of the port.
Respectable idea?
Bill
At 06:38 AM 11/26/2002, Estrade Matthieu wrote:
>heh ok, i was using the wrong stuff, i didn't know about this struct server_addrs_rec.
>
>what r->server->port is used for ?
>i just would like to know what is the difference btw usecanonicalName On and Off for the r->server->port
>why default port is sent instead of real port (socket port), i think there is a reason :)
>
>Jeff Trawick wrote:
>>
>>Estrade Matthieu <ma...@ifrance.com> writes:
>>
>>
>>>
>>>My module need to know the r->server->port, i mean the port of
>>>virtual host used by the client.
>>>
>>
>>
>>isn't that in r->server->addrs->host_port?
>>
>>
Re: r->server->port problem
Posted by Estrade Matthieu <es...@ifrance.com>.
heh ok, i was using the wrong stuff, i didn't know about this struct
server_addrs_rec.
what r->server->port is used for ?
i just would like to know what is the difference btw usecanonicalName On
and Off for the r->server->port
why default port is sent instead of real port (socket port), i think
there is a reason :)
Jeff Trawick wrote:
>Estrade Matthieu <es...@ifrance.com> writes:
>
>
>
>>My module need to know the r->server->port, i mean the port of
>>virtual host used by the client.
>>
>>
>
>isn't that in r->server->addrs->host_port?
>
>
>
Re: r->server->port problem
Posted by Jeff Trawick <tr...@attglobal.net>.
Estrade Matthieu <es...@ifrance.com> writes:
> My module need to know the r->server->port, i mean the port of
> virtual host used by the client.
isn't that in r->server->addrs->host_port?
--
Jeff Trawick | trawick@attglobal.net
Born in Roswell... married an alien...
Re: r->server->port problem
Posted by Estrade Matthieu <es...@ifrance.com>.
My module need to know the r->server->port, i mean the port of virtual
host used by the client.
in my apache, i have 2 VHOST:
The problem happened when i was behind an Intel SSL Accelerator.
client https ---> SSL INTEL 443 --> Reverse Proxy 8095
The SSL accelerator is listening on 443, send clear http on port 8095 of
my RP as:
GET / HTTP/1.1
Host: lala.com
\n\n\r
<VirtualHost ip:8095>
ServerName lala.com
ProxyPass / http://host1.com
ProxyPassReverse....
</VirtualHost>
<VirtualHost ip:80>
Servername lala.com
redirect / https://lala.com (redirect to HTTPS)
</VirtualHost>
my module will find r->server->port = 80 even if the SSL Accelerator is
connected on port 8095
It can happen too if i have the same servername in each VHOST.
My module is now checking conn->socket->port or something like that... i
have no more problem
What i find buggy is the correct VHOST is used, if not, the connection
should be a loop !
so i am in the correct VHOST and when my module check r->server->port, i
find 80 !
Jeff Trawick wrote:
>Estrade Matthieu <es...@ifrance.com> writes:
>
>
>
>>I posted a mail about a problem with r->server->port few days ago,
>>I did a patch to correct this bug, but i am not sure it's a bug...
>>
>>the problem was when UseCannonicalName is Off,
>>
>>
>
>I don't think it is a bug.
>
>What exactly does your module need to know?
>
>
>
Re: MPM perchild.
Posted by Enrico Weigelt <we...@metux.de>.
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 06:44:13PM +0100, Jonas Eriksson wrote:
<snip>
> /usr/local/apache2.0.43/conf/httpd.conf
> [Tue Nov 26 18:35:41 2002] [debug] perchild.c(2007): filling out
> child_info_table; UID: 1096, GID: 1094, SD: 4 4, OUTPUT: 5 5, Child Num:
> 0
> [Tue Nov 26 18:35:41 2002] [debug] perchild.c(2007): filling out
> child_info_table; UID: 1096, GID: 1094, SD: 4 4, OUTPUT: 5 5, Child Num:
> 1
> [Tue Nov 26 18:35:41 2002] [debug] perchild.c(2007): filling out
> child_info_table; UID: 1096, GID: 1094, SD: 4 4, OUTPUT: 5 5, Child Num:
> 2
Little question about ChildPerUserId. The manual states, that the
first parameter n is the ID of the child to assign, but the
set_child_per_user_id function seems to assign n childs to the given uid/gid.
is that ok ?
~-n
--
Bestes Mittel gegen Mailviren: Outlook löschen.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Enrico Weigelt == metux ITS
Webhosting ab 5 EUR/Monat. UUCP, rawIP und vieles mehr.
phone: +49 36207 519931 www: http://www.metux.de/
fax: +49 36207 519932 email: contact@metux.de
cellphone: +49 174 7066481 smsgate: sms.weigelt@metux.de
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Diese Mail wurde mit UUCP versandt. http://www.metux.de/uucp/
Re: SV: MPM perchild.
Posted by Johannes Erdfelt <jo...@erdfelt.com>.
That looks about good.
Do you only have one child defined?
JE
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002, Jonas Eriksson <jo...@webkonsulterna.com> wrote:
>
>
> Hmm sorry! I did a bougus error in http.conf ...
>
> When i now start the server i get the following in my shell promt and
> the server starts.
> What does the debug info tell? Is it all ok or do i have to change
> anyting?
>
> [root@mose /usr/local/apache2.0.43/bin]# ./httpd -f
> /usr/local/apache2.0.43/conf/httpd.conf
> [Tue Nov 26 18:35:41 2002] [debug] perchild.c(2007): filling out
> child_info_table; UID: 1096, GID: 1094, SD: 4 4, OUTPUT: 5 5, Child Num:
> 0
> [Tue Nov 26 18:35:41 2002] [debug] perchild.c(2007): filling out
> child_info_table; UID: 1096, GID: 1094, SD: 4 4, OUTPUT: 5 5, Child Num:
> 1
> [Tue Nov 26 18:35:41 2002] [debug] perchild.c(2007): filling out
> child_info_table; UID: 1096, GID: 1094, SD: 4 4, OUTPUT: 5 5, Child Num:
> 2
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2002, Jonas Eriksson <jo...@webkonsulterna.com> wrote:
> > I Still get error "Unable to find process with matching uid/gid."
> > after compileing 2.43 with
> >
> http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/httpd-2.0/server/mpm/experimental/perc
> > hild/perchild.c
>
> Are you sure you configured your setup correctly?
>
> Do you have a ChildPerUserId before you use AssignUserId?
>
> Can you give us the configuration you're using?
>
> JE
>
>
SV: MPM perchild.
Posted by Jonas Eriksson <jo...@webkonsulterna.com>.
Hmm sorry! I did a bougus error in http.conf ...
When i now start the server i get the following in my shell promt and
the server starts.
What does the debug info tell? Is it all ok or do i have to change
anyting?
[root@mose /usr/local/apache2.0.43/bin]# ./httpd -f
/usr/local/apache2.0.43/conf/httpd.conf
[Tue Nov 26 18:35:41 2002] [debug] perchild.c(2007): filling out
child_info_table; UID: 1096, GID: 1094, SD: 4 4, OUTPUT: 5 5, Child Num:
0
[Tue Nov 26 18:35:41 2002] [debug] perchild.c(2007): filling out
child_info_table; UID: 1096, GID: 1094, SD: 4 4, OUTPUT: 5 5, Child Num:
1
[Tue Nov 26 18:35:41 2002] [debug] perchild.c(2007): filling out
child_info_table; UID: 1096, GID: 1094, SD: 4 4, OUTPUT: 5 5, Child Num:
2
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002, Jonas Eriksson <jo...@webkonsulterna.com> wrote:
> I Still get error "Unable to find process with matching uid/gid."
> after compileing 2.43 with
>
http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/httpd-2.0/server/mpm/experimental/perc
> hild/perchild.c
Are you sure you configured your setup correctly?
Do you have a ChildPerUserId before you use AssignUserId?
Can you give us the configuration you're using?
JE
Re: MPM perchild.
Posted by Johannes Erdfelt <jo...@erdfelt.com>.
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002, Jonas Eriksson <jo...@webkonsulterna.com> wrote:
> I Still get error "Unable to find process with matching uid/gid."
> after compileing 2.43 with
> http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/httpd-2.0/server/mpm/experimental/perc
> hild/perchild.c
Are you sure you configured your setup correctly?
Do you have a ChildPerUserId before you use AssignUserId?
Can you give us the configuration you're using?
JE
MPM perchild.
Posted by Jonas Eriksson <jo...@webkonsulterna.com>.
Hi
I Still get error "Unable to find process with matching uid/gid."
after compileing 2.43 with
http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/httpd-2.0/server/mpm/experimental/perc
hild/perchild.c
Any ideas?
Re: r->server->port problem
Posted by Jeff Trawick <tr...@attglobal.net>.
Estrade Matthieu <es...@ifrance.com> writes:
> I posted a mail about a problem with r->server->port few days ago,
> I did a patch to correct this bug, but i am not sure it's a bug...
>
> the problem was when UseCannonicalName is Off,
I don't think it is a bug.
What exactly does your module need to know?
--
Jeff Trawick | trawick@attglobal.net
Born in Roswell... married an alien...