You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org by vjintegrates <vi...@gmail.com> on 2011/08/01 12:34:55 UTC
running FOP .95 version report with 0.20 version of jar
Hi, We have a large set of reports written with 0.20 version of FOP. We are
planning to upgrade then to .095 version. However at customer installation
there are custom reports files which we do not have access to so we did not
want to upgrade to jar file to .95 version. Will .95 version of reports fail
in .20 version of JAR ?
--
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/running-FOP-.95-version-report-with-0.20-version-of-jar-tp32168565p32168565.html
Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Re: running FOP .95 version report with 0.20 version of jar
Posted by Rob Sargent <rs...@xmission.com>.
If you can deduce at run-time which users/reports need 0.20 v. 0.95 then
you can invoke the correct library as necessary with classpath
manipulation, but I doubt you'll have much luck running in "mixed mode".
On 08/01/2011 04:34 AM, vjintegrates wrote:
> Hi, We have a large set of reports written with 0.20 version of FOP. We are
> planning to upgrade then to .095 version. However at customer installation
> there are custom reports files which we do not have access to so we did not
> want to upgrade to jar file to .95 version. Will .95 version of reports fail
> in .20 version of JAR ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org