You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@openoffice.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2015/09/12 09:43:14 UTC
[Issue 126516] New: TYPE() formula help doesn't document value 64
for arrays
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126516
Issue ID: 126516
Issue Type: DEFECT
Summary: TYPE() formula help doesn't document value 64 for
arrays
Product: Calc
Version: 4.1.1
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: CONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: help
Assignee: issues@openoffice.apache.org
Reporter: damjan@apache.org
Our source code for TYPE() formula returns 64 for arrays, ODFF agrees with
this, yet this value is completely undocumented in our help.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the issue.
[Issue 126516] TYPE() formula help doesn't document value 64 for
arrays
Posted by bu...@apache.org.
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126516
damjan@apache.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.2
Latest|--- |4.2.0-dev
Confirmation on| |
Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Developer|--- |Easy
Difficulty| |
--- Comment #2 from damjan@apache.org ---
Patched, resolving fixed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the issue.
[Issue 126516] TYPE() formula help doesn't document value 64 for
arrays
Posted by bu...@apache.org.
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126516
--- Comment #3 from SVN Robot <sv...@dev.null.org> ---
"damjan" committed SVN revision 1702604 into trunk:
#i126516# Document the return values for the TYPE() formula function in the
o...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the issue.
[Issue 126516] TYPE() formula help doesn't document value 64 for
arrays
Posted by bu...@apache.org.
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126516
damjan@apache.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags| |4.1.2_release_blocker?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the issue.
4.1.2_release_blocker requested: [Issue 126516] TYPE() formula help
doesn't document value 64 for arrays
Posted by bu...@apache.org.
damjan@apache.org has asked for 4.1.2_release_blocker:
Issue 126516: TYPE() formula help doesn't document value 64 for arrays
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126516
[Issue 126516] TYPE() formula help doesn't document value 64 for
arrays
Posted by bu...@apache.org.
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126516
--- Comment #1 from SVN Robot <sv...@dev.null.org> ---
"damjan" committed SVN revision 1702597 into trunk:
#i126516# TYPE() formula help doesn't document value 64 for arrays
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the issue.
[Issue 126516] TYPE() formula help doesn't document value 64 for
arrays
Posted by bu...@apache.org.
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126516
Andrea Pescetti <pe...@apache.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |pescetti@apache.org
Flags|4.1.2_release_blocker? |4.1.2_release_blocker-
Target Milestone|4.1.2 |4.2.0
--- Comment #4 from Andrea Pescetti <pe...@apache.org> ---
This would be ready to merge, but updating English strings is not feasible in
4.1.2 since, as it is normal for a x.y.2 version, as a guideline we don't
introduce string changes (which would impact translations).
This is in trunk, the next code -> Pootle string update will be based on trunk
(it already is) and thus this will be included in the next (after 4.1.2)
release with the normal translation workflow.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the issue.
4.1.2_release_blocker denied: [Issue 126516] TYPE() formula help
doesn't document value 64 for arrays
Posted by bu...@apache.org.
Andrea Pescetti <pe...@apache.org> has denied damjan@apache.org's request
for 4.1.2_release_blocker:
Issue 126516: TYPE() formula help doesn't document value 64 for arrays
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126516
--- Comment #4 from Andrea Pescetti <pe...@apache.org> ---
This would be ready to merge, but updating English strings is not feasible in
4.1.2 since, as it is normal for a x.y.2 version, as a guideline we don't
introduce string changes (which would impact translations).
This is in trunk, the next code -> Pootle string update will be based on trunk
(it already is) and thus this will be included in the next (after 4.1.2)
release with the normal translation workflow.