You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@qpid.apache.org by "Steve Huston (JIRA)" <qp...@incubator.apache.org> on 2008/10/15 23:50:44 UTC
[jira] Resolved: (QPID-1333) Compile failure in C++
tests/ClientSessionTest.cpp at rev 702675
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1333?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Steve Huston resolved QPID-1333.
--------------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: M4
Assignee: Steve Huston
Checked in for svn revision 705067.
> Compile failure in C++ tests/ClientSessionTest.cpp at rev 702675
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: QPID-1333
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1333
> Project: Qpid
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: C++ Client
> Environment: RHEL 4, Boost 1.35
> Reporter: Steve Huston
> Assignee: Steve Huston
> Fix For: M4
>
>
> At svn rev 702675 the C++ test qpid/cpp/src/tests/ClientSessionTest.cpp failed compile with:
> ClientSessionTest.cpp:165: error: expected constructor, destructor, or type conversion before '(' token
> ClientSessionTest.cpp:186: error: expected constructor, destructor, or type conversion before '(' token
> The noted lines both contain QPID_AUTO_TEST_CASE_EXPECTED_FAILURES
> I thought this may have been a mis-coded BOOST macro in unit_test.h, and changed:
> @@ -76,7 +76,7 @@
> #endif
> #ifndef QPID_AUTO_TEST_CASE_EXPECTED_FAILURES
> -# define QPID_AUTO_TEST_CASE_EXPECTED_FAILURES(name,n) BOOST_AUTO_TEST_SUITE_EXPECTED_FAILURES(name,n)
> +# define QPID_AUTO_TEST_CASE_EXPECTED_FAILURES(name,n) BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE_EXPECTED_FAILURES(name,n)
> #endif
> but that moved the error down a line to:
> ClientSessionTest.cpp:166: error: expected unqualified-id before '{' token
> ClientSessionTest.cpp:187: error: expected unqualified-id before '{' token
> So I extended the work-around section for QPID_AUTO_TEST_CASE_EXPECTED_FAILURES to :
> --- unit_test.h (revision 702976)
> +++ unit_test.h (working copy)
> @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@
> // Workaround for BOOST_AUTO_TEST_SUITE_EXPECTED_FAILURES
> //
> -#if (BOOST_VERSION < 103500)
> +#if (BOOST_VERSION < 103600)
> That got things compiling, but I'm not sure this is correct...
> The diff I have here now (all together) is:
> Index: unit_test.h
> ===================================================================
> --- unit_test.h (revision 702976)
> +++ unit_test.h (working copy)
> @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@
> // Workaround for BOOST_AUTO_TEST_SUITE_EXPECTED_FAILURES
> //
> -#if (BOOST_VERSION < 103500)
> +#if (BOOST_VERSION < 103600)
> // Keep the test function for compilation but do not not register it.
> // TODO aconway 2008-04-23: better workaround for expected failures.
> @@ -76,7 +76,7 @@
> #endif
> #ifndef QPID_AUTO_TEST_CASE_EXPECTED_FAILURES
> -# define QPID_AUTO_TEST_CASE_EXPECTED_FAILURES(name,n) BOOST_AUTO_TEST_SUITE_EXPECTED_FAILURES(name,n)
> +# define QPID_AUTO_TEST_CASE_EXPECTED_FAILURES(name,n) BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE_EXPECTED_FAILURES(name,n)
> #endif
> #ifndef QPID_AUTO_TEST_SUITE_END
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.