You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to general@incubator.apache.org by Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com> on 2016/05/26 21:55:31 UTC
[VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.10.0-incubating (RC1)
Please vote to approve the release of the following candidate as Apache
SystemML version 0.10.0!
The PPMC vote thread:
https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org/msg00532.html
And the result:
https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org/msg00599.html
The tag to be voted on is v0.10.0-rc1
(ddf0e0941afe5d9c2cc7c574a6983aadd98c1fc3)
https://github.com/apache/incubator-systemml/tree/ddf0e0941afe5d9c2cc7c574a6983aadd98c1fc3
The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachesystemml-1005
The distribution and rat report is also available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/systemml/0.10.0-incubating-rc1/
The vote is open for at least 72 hours and passes if a majority of at least
3 +1 PMC votes are cast.
[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache SystemML 0.10.0
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
--
Luciano Resende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.10.0-incubating (RC1)
Posted by Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>.
Just want to reiterate my +1,
And also mention that we got one of our mentors to vote on the dev list
thread
https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org/msg00617.html
Anyone else willing to help us get this release out.
Thanks
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 2:55 PM, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>
> Please vote to approve the release of the following candidate as Apache
> SystemML version 0.10.0!
>
> The PPMC vote thread:
>
> https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org/msg00532.html
>
> And the result:
>
> https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org/msg00599.html
>
> The tag to be voted on is v0.10.0-rc1
> (ddf0e0941afe5d9c2cc7c574a6983aadd98c1fc3)
>
>
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-systemml/tree/ddf0e0941afe5d9c2cc7c574a6983aadd98c1fc3
>
> The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachesystemml-1005
>
> The distribution and rat report is also available at:
>
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/systemml/0.10.0-incubating-rc1/
>
> The vote is open for at least 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
> least 3 +1 PMC votes are cast.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache SystemML 0.10.0
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>
> --
> Luciano Resende
> http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>
--
Luciano Resende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.10.0-incubating (RC1)
Posted by Deron Eriksson <de...@gmail.com>.
Thank you Justin and John for the clarification WRT the binaries in the
source release.
Deron
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 8:43 PM, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Thanks,
>
> Please consider this vote canceled and I will work on another RC with
> proper fix for the binary files in the source distro.
>
> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 7:13 PM, John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 9:54 PM Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > > We will update trunk to remove the specified files. Will we need to
> > begin
> > > > voting again for another release candidate with these changes, or
> would
> > > it
> > > > suffice that the next release will have this fix?
> > >
> > > Depends on how other IPMC members vote, if you get 3 +1 votes and more
> > > +1’s than -1’s then it’s a release.
> > >
> >
> > Agreed, my vote would be -1 on including binaries in the source release.
> >
> > However, one thing to point out, we're not asking you to remove binaries
> > files from your source repository, just not include them in the source
> > release. For any file you're excluding, you should explain how to create
> > it, e.g. the hadoop.dll is created by compiling hadoop or by downloading
> > their binary (and explain how to configure the build to point to those
> > binaries, if needed to compile/test)
> >
> >
> > >
> > > IMO having executable binary files in a source release means you
> > shouldn’t
> > > release it. See the 4th paragraph here. [1]
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Justin
> > >
> > > 1. http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#what
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Luciano Resende
> http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.10.0-incubating (RC1)
Posted by Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>.
Thanks,
Please consider this vote canceled and I will work on another RC with
proper fix for the binary files in the source distro.
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 7:13 PM, John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>
wrote:
> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 9:54 PM Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > > We will update trunk to remove the specified files. Will we need to
> begin
> > > voting again for another release candidate with these changes, or would
> > it
> > > suffice that the next release will have this fix?
> >
> > Depends on how other IPMC members vote, if you get 3 +1 votes and more
> > +1’s than -1’s then it’s a release.
> >
>
> Agreed, my vote would be -1 on including binaries in the source release.
>
> However, one thing to point out, we're not asking you to remove binaries
> files from your source repository, just not include them in the source
> release. For any file you're excluding, you should explain how to create
> it, e.g. the hadoop.dll is created by compiling hadoop or by downloading
> their binary (and explain how to configure the build to point to those
> binaries, if needed to compile/test)
>
>
> >
> > IMO having executable binary files in a source release means you
> shouldn’t
> > release it. See the 4th paragraph here. [1]
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Justin
> >
> > 1. http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#what
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >
> >
>
--
Luciano Resende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.10.0-incubating (RC1)
Posted by "John D. Ament" <jo...@apache.org>.
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 9:54 PM Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > We will update trunk to remove the specified files. Will we need to begin
> > voting again for another release candidate with these changes, or would
> it
> > suffice that the next release will have this fix?
>
> Depends on how other IPMC members vote, if you get 3 +1 votes and more
> +1’s than -1’s then it’s a release.
>
Agreed, my vote would be -1 on including binaries in the source release.
However, one thing to point out, we're not asking you to remove binaries
files from your source repository, just not include them in the source
release. For any file you're excluding, you should explain how to create
it, e.g. the hadoop.dll is created by compiling hadoop or by downloading
their binary (and explain how to configure the build to point to those
binaries, if needed to compile/test)
>
> IMO having executable binary files in a source release means you shouldn’t
> release it. See the 4th paragraph here. [1]
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
>
> 1. http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#what
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.10.0-incubating (RC1)
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>.
Hi,
> We will update trunk to remove the specified files. Will we need to begin
> voting again for another release candidate with these changes, or would it
> suffice that the next release will have this fix?
Depends on how other IPMC members vote, if you get 3 +1 votes and more +1’s than -1’s then it’s a release.
IMO having executable binary files in a source release means you shouldn’t release it. See the 4th paragraph here. [1]
Thanks,
Justin
1. http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#what
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.10.0-incubating (RC1)
Posted by Deron Eriksson <de...@gmail.com>.
Hi Justin,
Thank you for reviewing the SystemML release candidate. I agree about the
large number of artifacts at [1]. It would also help us in terms of project
maintenance to decrease the number of artifacts that we are generating.
We will update trunk to remove the specified files. Will we need to begin
voting again for another release candidate with these changes, or would it
suffice that the next release will have this fix?
Thank you,
Deron
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 6:18 PM, Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry -1 (binding) due to unexpected binaries in the source release.
>
> For the source artefact I checked:
> - signatures and hashes good
> - file name contain incubating
> - DISCLAIMER exists
> - LICENSE and NOTICE correct
> - There are unexpended binary in the source release (see below)
> - All files have apache headers
> - Can compile from source
>
> There’s a number of binary files included in the source release:
> ls ./src/test/config/hadoop_bin_windows/bin
> hadoop.dll hadoop.lib libwinutils.lib winutils.pdb
> hadoop.exp hadoop.pdb winutils.exe
>
> There a large number of files at [1] so it’s not entirely clear what the
> release artefacts are to vote on you might want to just include the .zip /
> .tar.gz files next time.
>
> I also looked at the binary release, nice to see entirely different
> LICENSE there based on the contents of the file. Minor issue there’s no
> need to list the copyright for abego software or ANTLR software in the
> NOTICE file as both are BSD licensed. [2] Please fix this for the next
> release.
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
>
>
> 1.
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/systemml/0.10.0-incubating-rc1/
> 2. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#permissive-deps
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.10.0-incubating (RC1)
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>.
Hi,
Sorry -1 (binding) due to unexpected binaries in the source release.
For the source artefact I checked:
- signatures and hashes good
- file name contain incubating
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE and NOTICE correct
- There are unexpended binary in the source release (see below)
- All files have apache headers
- Can compile from source
There’s a number of binary files included in the source release:
ls ./src/test/config/hadoop_bin_windows/bin
hadoop.dll hadoop.lib libwinutils.lib winutils.pdb
hadoop.exp hadoop.pdb winutils.exe
There a large number of files at [1] so it’s not entirely clear what the release artefacts are to vote on you might want to just include the .zip / .tar.gz files next time.
I also looked at the binary release, nice to see entirely different LICENSE there based on the contents of the file. Minor issue there’s no need to list the copyright for abego software or ANTLR software in the NOTICE file as both are BSD licensed. [2] Please fix this for the next release.
Thanks,
Justin
1. https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/systemml/0.10.0-incubating-rc1/
2. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#permissive-deps
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org