You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@spamassassin.apache.org by Marcus Schopen <li...@localguru.de> on 2016/09/25 12:18:10 UTC
spamassassin 3.4.1 on ubuntu precise systemd problems
Hi,
I'm trying to build a spamassassin 3.4.1 backport on ubuntu precise, but
have problems to handle systemd dependencies. Is it a good idea just to
remove "dh-systemd" from control Build-Depends and remove
"dh_systemd_enable --no-enable" from rules? Build is running through.
Ciao
Marcus
Re: spamassassin 3.4.1 on ubuntu precise systemd problems
Posted by Marcus Schopen <li...@localguru.de>.
Hi Matus,
Am Sonntag, den 25.09.2016, 17:59 +0200 schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas:
> On 25.09.16 14:18, Marcus Schopen wrote:
> >I'm trying to build a spamassassin 3.4.1 backport on ubuntu precise, but
> >have problems to handle systemd dependencies. Is it a good idea just to
> >remove "dh-systemd" from control Build-Depends and remove
> >"dh_systemd_enable --no-enable" from rules? Build is running through.
>
> you really should post this to ubuntu mailing list. This has nothing to do
> with SA, it's purely issue of building on ubuntu.
I know it's a little off topic, but I thought here is someone who's
running that backport.
Ciao!
Marcus
Re: spamassassin 3.4.1 on ubuntu precise systemd problems
Posted by Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uh...@fantomas.sk>.
On 25.09.16 14:18, Marcus Schopen wrote:
>I'm trying to build a spamassassin 3.4.1 backport on ubuntu precise, but
>have problems to handle systemd dependencies. Is it a good idea just to
>remove "dh-systemd" from control Build-Depends and remove
>"dh_systemd_enable --no-enable" from rules? Build is running through.
you really should post this to ubuntu mailing list. This has nothing to do
with SA, it's purely issue of building on ubuntu.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
We are but packets in the Internet of life (userfriendly.org)