You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to easyant-dev@incubator.apache.org by Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org> on 2012/01/09 16:43:18 UTC
Re: State of EasyAnt
On 2012-01-09, Nicolas Lalevée wrote:
> Le 6 janv. 2012 à 07:35, Stefan Bodewig a écrit :
>> Agreed, this needs to be done, but do we have any timeframe by which
>> this will be done or by which we call incubation failed? To some degree
>> I'm playing devil's advocate here, but eternal incubation is not an
>> option.
> I am starting to think it quite loud so I'll write it. If there is no
> much progress until the next report, 3 month from now, I'm thinking
> that we shouldn't bother Apache any longer.
That's quite ambitiuos. I agree that EasyAnt should really consider its
options by then, not necessarily make a decision.
Also, I wouldn't frame it as "bother Apache" but rather try to find out
why we don't see more participation. Is there anything in the ASF that
is standing in the way of EasyAnt's progress (the license policy for
plugins might, I don't know)?
Stefan
Re: State of EasyAnt
Posted by ant elder <an...@gmail.com>.
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org> wrote:
> On 2012-01-09, Nicolas Lalevée wrote:
>
>> Le 6 janv. 2012 à 07:35, Stefan Bodewig a écrit :
>
>>> Agreed, this needs to be done, but do we have any timeframe by which
>>> this will be done or by which we call incubation failed? To some degree
>>> I'm playing devil's advocate here, but eternal incubation is not an
>>> option.
>
>> I am starting to think it quite loud so I'll write it. If there is no
>> much progress until the next report, 3 month from now, I'm thinking
>> that we shouldn't bother Apache any longer.
>
> That's quite ambitiuos. I agree that EasyAnt should really consider its
> options by then, not necessarily make a decision.
>
> Also, I wouldn't frame it as "bother Apache" but rather try to find out
> why we don't see more participation. Is there anything in the ASF that
> is standing in the way of EasyAnt's progress (the license policy for
> plugins might, I don't know)?
>
> Stefan
Yes +1 to that. Don't feel its a "bother", its fine to be here if you
all still think its useful.
...ant