You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@ignite.apache.org by "Vladislav Pyatkov (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2024/02/06 11:57:00 UTC
[jira] [Updated] (IGNITE-21379) Investigate whether currently used busyLocks implementation is fast enough
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-21379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Vladislav Pyatkov updated IGNITE-21379:
---------------------------------------
Epic Link: IGNITE-21463
> Investigate whether currently used busyLocks implementation is fast enough
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: IGNITE-21379
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-21379
> Project: Ignite
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Alexander Lapin
> Assignee: Vladislav Pyatkov
> Priority: Major
> Labels: ignite-3, performance
>
> h3. Motivation
> Seems that our busyLocks (IgniteSpinBusyLock) aren't good enough from the performance perspective. Let's compare current implementation with common RW locks, CheckpointReadWriteLock, etc. Depending on the results it'll be required either to use faster implementation or re-consider busyLock idea itself because currently it brings significant performance drop. Given ticket is only about initial step - busyLock performance investigation.
> h3. Definition of Done
> * Prepare JMH benchmarks for busyLocks performance investigation.
> * Compare IgniteSpinBusyLock, common RW lock, CheckpointReadWriteLock, etc in order to understand whether IgniteSpinBusyLock is fast enough.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)