You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@juneau.apache.org by James Bognar <ja...@apache.org> on 2022/09/11 14:56:24 UTC
Anyone using RDF language support in Juneau? Proposal to drop support.
Is anyone still actively using any of the RDF language support in Juneau?
We've got a single high security vulnerability in jena-core 3.10.0
that requires us to upgrade to jena-core 4.2.0. The new API is not
compatible with the old so it would require refactoring the existing
code (after first learning the new API).
If nobody is actively using RDF anymore (it's somewhat antiquated
technology), my proposal is to remove it entirely in 9.0. Does anyone
have any concerns or input?
Re: Anyone using RDF language support in Juneau? Proposal to drop support.
Posted by James Bognar <ja...@apache.org>.
I've gone ahead and split the difference. I've removed them from
being built into artifacts but haven't removed the source code trees.
If we have future interest in them, we can easily re-add them to the
distribution.
On Sun, Sep 11, 2022 at 6:20 PM Peter Haumer <ph...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> Hello James.
>
> As you know I used it for many years and loved it, but nowadays I am working solely on Nodejs projects. So, no objection from my projects.
>
>
>
> I forwarded your messages to the IBM open-source Slack to see if there are still users out there.
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks and best regards,
> Peter Haumer.
>
> ______________________________________________________________
>
> PETER HAUMER, Dr. rer. nat.
> IBM Z Systems Software
> ______________________________________________________________
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Craig Russell <ap...@gmail.com>
> Date: Sunday, September 11, 2022 at 11:51 AM
> To: dev@juneau.apache.org <de...@juneau.apache.org>
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Anyone using RDF language support in Juneau? Proposal to drop support.
>
> No concerns here.
>
> Craig
>
> > On Sep 11, 2022, at 07:56, James Bognar <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Is anyone still actively using any of the RDF language support in Juneau?
> >
> > We've got a single high security vulnerability in jena-core 3.10.0
> > that requires us to upgrade to jena-core 4.2.0. The new API is not
> > compatible with the old so it would require refactoring the existing
> > code (after first learning the new API).
> >
> > If nobody is actively using RDF anymore (it's somewhat antiquated
> > technology), my proposal is to remove it entirely in 9.0. Does anyone
> > have any concerns or input?
>
> Craig L Russell
> clr@apache.org
Re: Anyone using RDF language support in Juneau? Proposal to drop support.
Posted by Craig Russell <ap...@gmail.com>.
No concerns here.
Craig
> On Sep 11, 2022, at 07:56, James Bognar <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Is anyone still actively using any of the RDF language support in Juneau?
>
> We've got a single high security vulnerability in jena-core 3.10.0
> that requires us to upgrade to jena-core 4.2.0. The new API is not
> compatible with the old so it would require refactoring the existing
> code (after first learning the new API).
>
> If nobody is actively using RDF anymore (it's somewhat antiquated
> technology), my proposal is to remove it entirely in 9.0. Does anyone
> have any concerns or input?
Craig L Russell
clr@apache.org
Re: Anyone using RDF language support in Juneau? Proposal to drop support.
Posted by Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com>.
No RDF here.
Gary
On Sun, Sep 11, 2022, 07:57 James Bognar <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
> Is anyone still actively using any of the RDF language support in Juneau?
>
> We've got a single high security vulnerability in jena-core 3.10.0
> that requires us to upgrade to jena-core 4.2.0. The new API is not
> compatible with the old so it would require refactoring the existing
> code (after first learning the new API).
>
> If nobody is actively using RDF anymore (it's somewhat antiquated
> technology), my proposal is to remove it entirely in 9.0. Does anyone
> have any concerns or input?
>