You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@activemq.apache.org by "Robbie Gemmell (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2021/08/30 11:02:00 UTC

[jira] [Created] (ARTEMIS-3450) StaticPoolTest and DiscoveryPoolTest fail sporadically in CI

Robbie Gemmell created ARTEMIS-3450:
---------------------------------------

             Summary: StaticPoolTest and DiscoveryPoolTest fail sporadically in CI
                 Key: ARTEMIS-3450
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-3450
             Project: ActiveMQ Artemis
          Issue Type: Test
          Components: Tests
            Reporter: Robbie Gemmell


The StaticPoolTest and DiscoveryPoolTest tests added in ARTEMIS-3365 fail sporadically in CI

Some examples:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/runs/3416448949?check_suite_focus=true#step:5:2325
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/runs/3433060966?check_suite_focus=true#step:5:2223

Looking at the tests I do see a few small issues, though they may not explain the failures:

- The MockTargetProbe contains a HashMap used from multiple threads (test and pool) in a manner that isnt thread safe. It actually threw ConcurrentModificationException during at least one CI run (e.g https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/runs/3416448949?check_suite_focus=true#step:5:2163). That may or may not be the cause of the test failure seen in the same log (note it isnt seen in the other test log, though it failed at a different assertion). It should use ConcurrentHashMap or perhaps alternatively protect use of the map more generally.
- The PoolTestBase#testPoolQuorumWithMultipleTargets test creates and starts a pool but doesnt ensure it is stopped on assertion failure. The DiscoveryPoolTest subclass runs this test with a pool using a scheduled executor, so it should presumably be cleaned up in the same manner the other tests all use.
- One of the tests asserts there are no 'createdTargets' entries, and then immediately iterates those [non-existent] entries to assert on the non-existent values, which seems quite strange.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)