You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@spamassassin.apache.org by bu...@issues.apache.org on 2010/06/01 16:20:49 UTC
[Bug 6442] New: win32: find workaround for getpwnam() so user_prefs
can be handled
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6442
Summary: win32: find workaround for getpwnam() so user_prefs
can be handled
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 3.3.1
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows 7
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: spamc/spamd
AssignedTo: dev@spamassassin.apache.org
ReportedBy: lemke@jam-software.com
The getpwnam() function isn't implemented for windows so user header
information cannot be parsed by spamd.
If user information is given, this produces the following warning:
Jun 1 15:28:31.776 [-4504] info: spamd: handle_user unable to find user:
'lemke'
I didn't tried virtual conf dirs yet so it may be possible to work around by
using it. If so, it should be used by default on the windows system, spamd is
running on, so it does use/create a user_prefs for any incoming email that has
a user defined.
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 6442] win32: find workaround for getpwnam() so user_prefs can
be handled
Posted by bu...@issues.apache.org.
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6442
Mark Martinec <Ma...@ijs.si> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P2 |P3
Target Milestone|Undefined |3.3.2
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 6442] win32: find workaround for getpwnam() so user_prefs can
be handled
Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6442
Kevin A. McGrail <km...@pccc.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |kmcgrail@pccc.com
Target Milestone|3.4.0 |3.4.1
--- Comment #2 from Kevin A. McGrail <km...@pccc.com> ---
Moving all open bugs where target is defined and 3.4.0 or lower to 3.4.1 target
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 6442] win32: find workaround for getpwnam() so user_prefs can
be handled
Posted by bu...@issues.apache.org.
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6442
Daniel Lemke <le...@jam-software.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |lemke@jam-software.com
--- Comment #1 from Daniel Lemke <le...@jam-software.com> 2010-06-09 05:21:03 EDT ---
Ok --virtual-config-dir is not possible either because -u has to be specified.
And again, this causes spamd to crash because of getpwnam() not implemented.
Why has -u to be set for spamd in order to use --virtual-config-dir?
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 6442] win32: find workaround for getpwnam() so user_prefs can
be handled
Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6442
Mark Martinec <Ma...@ijs.si> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|3.3.2 |3.4.0
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.