Re: cvs commit: apache/src README conf.h http_main.c util.c

[Randy Terbush <ra...@zyzzyva.com>]

To add my 2 cents to what looks to be a rager...

I _don't_ see the harm in adding these changes. Compile issues
are fairly easily checked and should be thoroughly check by the
time we all finish our builds for the final release.

I have the impression that several things are getting well ironed
out for this release, and we even seem to be getting some bug
reports about some rather elusive problems.

While I would like to see 1.1 out the door as much as anyone else,
I don't see a reason to ignore cleanups/polish like this one.


> Alexei Kosut wrote:
> > 
> > On Tue, 25 Jun 1996, Robert S. Thau wrote:
> > 
> > > Maybe so, but if I recall correctly (always a risk...) your patch did
> > > not just add comments --- it also changed the state of the conf.h defines
> > > for several different systems, and Brian was asking about the propriety
> > > of doing *that* so close to the release of 1.1 final.  I'm starting to
> > > agree with him...
> > 
> > As well I; it's agreed that we need to redo the defines, but not this
> > close to 1.1. Most defenitely not.
> > 
> 
> States: No.
> 
> Names: Yes.
> 
> According to my mem:
> 
>  HAS_GMTOFF -> HAVE_GMTOFF
>  FCNTL_* -> USE_FCNTL_*
>  HAVE_RESOURCE -> Use it as a #ifdef instead of a #if
> 
> Someone please explain to me the scare of these because frankly, I don't
> see it. Or or this some sort of freaking control thing? It's quite alright
> for people (who yell the loudest) to add whatever the frick they want,
> it 'pears to me.
> 
> -- 
> Jim Jagielski  << jim@jaguNET.com >>   |      "That's a Smith & Wesson,
>   **  jaguNET Access Services  **      |       and you've had your six" 
>       Email: info@jaguNET.com          |             - James Bond
> ++    http://www.jaguNET.com/         +++      Voice/Fax: 410-931-3157       ++