You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to issues@commons.apache.org by "Michael Osipov (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2019/01/02 09:12:00 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (VFS-687) HttpClient 5 based FileSystemProvider

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-687?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16731860#comment-16731860 ] 

Michael Osipov commented on VFS-687:
------------------------------------

To be honest, I personally see no future or benefit of VFS over NIO2 filesystem providers. I think they should be ported.

> HttpClient 5 based FileSystemProvider
> -------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: VFS-687
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-687
>             Project: Commons VFS
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>            Reporter: Woonsan Ko
>            Priority: Major
>
> As of VFS-360, we have two different http client based file system providers: "http3(s)" vs. "http4(s)".
> Since HttpClient 5 is coming out in the near future (HttpClient 5 Beta 2 is already available), it would be nice if we have "http5(s)" file system provider as well.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)