You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@maven.apache.org by "Tamas Cservenak (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2022/12/12 10:25:00 UTC

[jira] [Created] (MRESOLVER-308) HTTP transport showdown

Tamas Cservenak created MRESOLVER-308:
-----------------------------------------

             Summary: HTTP transport showdown
                 Key: MRESOLVER-308
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MRESOLVER-308
             Project: Maven Resolver
          Issue Type: Task
          Components: Resolver
            Reporter: Tamas Cservenak


For HTTP protocol resolver currently provides following transports:
 * transport-wagon that uses Maven 2.x Wagon, that among other protocols supports HTTP/1.1 as well
 * transport-http that uses directly Apache HttpClient 4.x supporting HTTP/1.1 but provides enhancements in form of "checksum strategy" (almost all of remote repositories emit those in headers, sparing one HTTP round-trip)

As we saw, is very easy to outperform these as:
 * Maven Central supports HTTP/1.1 but also HTTP/2
 * HTTP/3 is on the way as well

An experiment involving Jetty Client far outperformed both of existing transports, most probably due HTTP/2 support.

So, clients we should consider:
 * Jetty Client
 * OkHTTP
 * Java 11 HttpClient

Point is, to invest into something that (ideally) transparently supports HTTP/1.1 and HTTP/2, and more ideal would be if even HTTP/3 would be transparently supported (Jetty 12 works on that). We could then simply compare these implementations, count in pros and cons, and decide where we want to go,



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)