You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tomee.apache.org by Ivan <xh...@gmail.com> on 2011/09/25 06:14:06 UTC
[VOTE] Release Apache OpenEJB 3.0.4 (Second Try)
Hi,
Let's vote for Apache OpenEJB 3.0.4, this release is mostly for the
incoming Geronimo 2.1.8.
Comparing with the last version, only two JIRAs are included :
OPENEJB-1091: Cause of RollbackException swallowed
OPENEJB-1258 Boolean conversion problem in ejb-jar.xml
binary repository :
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenejb-094
source codes :
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/tags/openejb-3.0.4
vote artifacts :
Vote will be open for 72 hours.
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
--
Ivan
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenEJB 3.0.4 (Second Try)
Posted by Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>.
Great reminder Kevan.
As always i would say.
Gonna read It again quickly.
Jean Louis
Le 28 sept. 2011 19:15, "Kevan Miller" <ke...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>
> On Sep 25, 2011, at 12:19 AM, Ivan wrote:
>
>> Hmm, seems that I did not generate a source tar/zip, not sure whether it
is
>> must, as it is just for Geronimo dependency.
>
> Yes. It's required.
>
> http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#what-must-every-release-contain
>
> Good for everyone to review (esp. PMC members).
>
> --kevan
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenEJB 3.0.4 (Second Try)
Posted by Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>.
On Sep 25, 2011, at 12:19 AM, Ivan wrote:
> Hmm, seems that I did not generate a source tar/zip, not sure whether it is
> must, as it is just for Geronimo dependency.
Yes. It's required.
http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#what-must-every-release-contain
Good for everyone to review (esp. PMC members).
--kevan
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenEJB 3.0.4 (Second Try)
Posted by Ivan <xh...@gmail.com>.
Hmm, seems that I did not generate a source tar/zip, not sure whether it is
must, as it is just for Geronimo dependency.
Here is my +1.
2011/9/25 Ivan <xh...@gmail.com>
> Hi,
> Let's vote for Apache OpenEJB 3.0.4, this release is mostly for the
> incoming Geronimo 2.1.8.
> Comparing with the last version, only two JIRAs are included :
>
> OPENEJB-1091: Cause of RollbackException swallowed
> OPENEJB-1258 Boolean conversion problem in ejb-jar.xml
>
> binary repository :
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenejb-094
>
> source codes :
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/tags/openejb-3.0.4
>
> vote artifacts :
>
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
> --
> Ivan
>
--
Ivan
Re: Release binary scanning tool
Posted by Robert Burrell Donkin <rd...@apache.org>.
On 10/03/11 20:54, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
> On 10/01/11 05:59, David Blevins wrote:
>>
>> On Sep 30, 2011, at 4:11 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
>>> It'd need a name (we've been picking animal bits recently eg 'eye'
>>> and 'whisker' if you're short on inspiration)
>>
>> How about tentacle. As in the thing cephalopods use to wrap an
>> otherwise impenetrable shell and forcibly pry it open, exposing it's
>> contents for consumption.
>>
>> That could work for a tool that grabs the binaries (shells), cracks
>> them open and displays their contents for the public.
>>
>> bob: "We're going to do a release!"
>> joe: "I can't wait to get my tentacles on it."
>>
>> Maybe the plural, tentacles. You can't do much with one tentacle.
>
> +1
>
> I like tentacles :-)
Hopefully you should have rat karma now. I look forward to taking a look
at tentacles once you've checked it in :-)
Robert
Re: Release binary scanning tool
Posted by Robert Burrell Donkin <rd...@apache.org>.
On 10/01/11 05:59, David Blevins wrote:
>
> On Sep 30, 2011, at 4:11 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
<snip>
>> It'd need a name (we've been picking animal bits recently eg 'eye' and 'whisker' if you're short on inspiration)
>
> How about tentacle. As in the thing cephalopods use to wrap an otherwise impenetrable shell and forcibly pry it open, exposing it's contents for consumption.
>
> That could work for a tool that grabs the binaries (shells), cracks them open and displays their contents for the public.
>
> bob: "We're going to do a release!"
> joe: "I can't wait to get my tentacles on it."
>
> Maybe the plural, tentacles. You can't do much with one tentacle.
+1
I like tentacles :-)
Robert
Re: Release binary scanning tool
Posted by David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>.
On Sep 30, 2011, at 4:11 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
> On 09/30/11 00:31, David Blevins wrote:
>> Hey all,
>>
>> See below for some details on a little release scanning tool I wrote a couple days ago to help us get a few votes out more quickly.
> >
>> Seems like this is a fine place for a little tool like this to live.
>
> +1
>
>> Not fancy, maybe 5 or so hours of hacking, but a fairly effective start.
>>
>> src-> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/trunk/sandbox/legal/
>>
>> Would love to check it into a sandbox or something.
>
> We don't really have a sandbox but I'd be happy to slot it in at the top level[1]
>
> It'd need a name (we've been picking animal bits recently eg 'eye' and 'whisker' if you're short on inspiration)
How about tentacle. As in the thing cephalopods use to wrap an otherwise impenetrable shell and forcibly pry it open, exposing it's contents for consumption.
That could work for a tool that grabs the binaries (shells), cracks them open and displays their contents for the public.
bob: "We're going to do a release!"
joe: "I can't wait to get my tentacles on it."
Maybe the plural, tentacles. You can't do much with one tentacle.
-David
Re: Release binary scanning tool
Posted by Robert Burrell Donkin <rd...@apache.org>.
On 09/30/11 00:31, David Blevins wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> See below for some details on a little release scanning tool I wrote a couple days ago to help us get a few votes out more quickly.
>
> Seems like this is a fine place for a little tool like this to live.
+1
> Not fancy, maybe 5 or so hours of hacking, but a fairly effective start.
>
> src-> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/trunk/sandbox/legal/
>
> Would love to check it into a sandbox or something.
We don't really have a sandbox but I'd be happy to slot it in at the top
level[1]
It'd need a name (we've been picking animal bits recently eg 'eye' and
'whisker' if you're short on inspiration)
Robert
[1] http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/rat/
Release binary scanning tool
Posted by David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>.
Hey all,
See below for some details on a little release scanning tool I wrote a couple days ago to help us get a few votes out more quickly.
Seems like this is a fine place for a little tool like this to live. Not fancy, maybe 5 or so hours of hacking, but a fairly effective start.
src-> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/trunk/sandbox/legal/
Would love to check it into a sandbox or something.
-David
Begin forwarded message:
> From: David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
> Date: September 28, 2011 12:38:51 AM PDT
> To: dev@openejb.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenEJB 3.0.4 (Second Try)
>
> Because we've been having troubles getting votes out and we have many more coming (hoping to vet 4.0.0-beta-1 up shortly), I hacked up a tool to help. The tool will download all the archives from the maven staging repo, unpack them and create a little report of what is there:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/orgapacheopenejb-094/archives.html
>
> As an example, the standalone zip looks pretty good:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/orgapacheopenejb-094/org.apache.openejb.openejb-standalone.3.0.4.openejb-standalone-3.0.4.zip.licenses.html
>
> Notice it will recursively unpack all the jars in a jar.
>
> This jar for example ships junit but doesn't declare it in the license. In fact it doesn't have a license file of it's own:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/orgapacheopenejb-094/org.apache.openejb.openejb-itests-app.3.0.4.openejb-itests-app-3.0.4.jar.licenses.html
>
> Same with this archive:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/orgapacheopenejb-094/org.apache.openejb.openejb-itests-web.3.0.4.openejb-itests-web-3.0.4.war.licenses.html
>
> This jar has three license files. Two ASL files an one BSD. If the contents were all the same, I personally think it'd be fine -- three identical license files is still pretty clear -- but since they're different maybe we need to fix it.
>
> http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/orgapacheopenejb-094/org.apache.openejb.openejb-itests-standalone-client.3.0.4.openejb-itests-standalone-client-3.0.4.jar.licenses.html
>
> We could fix the licenses or maybe just drop the itests app, client and war.
>
>
> -David
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenEJB 3.0.4 (Second Try)
Posted by Ivan <xh...@gmail.com>.
Cancel the vote for the next try.
2011/9/29 David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
>
> On Sep 28, 2011, at 8:49 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 9:38 AM, David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> Because we've been having troubles getting votes out and we have many
> more coming (hoping to vet 4.0.0-beta-1 up shortly), I hacked up a tool to
> help.
> >
> > You're insane! :-) How did you manage to find more time when your
> > sleep takes barely 4 hours already?! Unbelievable.
>
> Hehe. Well, hoping to save time by spending it :) A few hours now to cut
> down on 3-4 week vote times is a good trade. I can do a lot of sleeping in
> 3-4 weeks :D
>
> Hopefully it will save us all some time.
>
> Still don't have my presentations ready for next week (giving 3
> presentations and participating in 3 other panels). But I'm sure I'll pull
> it off somehow :)
>
>
> -David
>
>
--
Ivan
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenEJB 3.0.4 (Second Try)
Posted by David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>.
On Sep 28, 2011, at 8:49 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 9:38 AM, David Blevins <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Because we've been having troubles getting votes out and we have many more coming (hoping to vet 4.0.0-beta-1 up shortly), I hacked up a tool to help.
>
> You're insane! :-) How did you manage to find more time when your
> sleep takes barely 4 hours already?! Unbelievable.
Hehe. Well, hoping to save time by spending it :) A few hours now to cut down on 3-4 week vote times is a good trade. I can do a lot of sleeping in 3-4 weeks :D
Hopefully it will save us all some time.
Still don't have my presentations ready for next week (giving 3 presentations and participating in 3 other panels). But I'm sure I'll pull it off somehow :)
-David
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenEJB 3.0.4 (Second Try)
Posted by Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>.
Also interested to get the answer ;-)
2011/9/28 Jacek Laskowski <ja...@japila.pl>
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 9:38 AM, David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Because we've been having troubles getting votes out and we have many
> more coming (hoping to vet 4.0.0-beta-1 up shortly), I hacked up a tool to
> help.
>
> You're insane! :-) How did you manage to find more time when your
> sleep takes barely 4 hours already?! Unbelievable.
>
> Jacek
>
> --
> Jacek Laskowski
> Java EE, functional languages and IBM WebSphere - http://blog.japila.pl
> Warszawa JUG conference = Confitura (formerly Javarsovia) ::
> http://confitura.pl
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenEJB 3.0.4 (Second Try)
Posted by Jacek Laskowski <ja...@japila.pl>.
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 9:38 AM, David Blevins <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Because we've been having troubles getting votes out and we have many more coming (hoping to vet 4.0.0-beta-1 up shortly), I hacked up a tool to help.
You're insane! :-) How did you manage to find more time when your
sleep takes barely 4 hours already?! Unbelievable.
Jacek
--
Jacek Laskowski
Java EE, functional languages and IBM WebSphere - http://blog.japila.pl
Warszawa JUG conference = Confitura (formerly Javarsovia) :: http://confitura.pl
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenEJB 3.0.4 (Second Try)
Posted by David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>.
On Sep 28, 2011, at 1:13 AM, Ivan wrote:
> Before I take the next step action, I wonder that those license issues must
> be fixed, right ? Also, for each binary file, only one LICENSE file is
> required in the META-INF directory, which contains all the licenses, all
> those license files,
> e.g. openejb-3.0.4/lib/openejb-http-3.0.4.jar.contents/META-INF/LICENSE
> should be removed. right ?
All the "foo.jar.contents" directories are just unpacked versions of the related jar, say "foo.jar". Makes it easier to browse the contents of a jar that contains other jars -- all the zips, wars, etc.
But whatever those licenses and notices contain should be in the "top level" LICENSE and NOTICE file of the archive. And ideally there'd be only one LICENSE and NOTICE per actual jar (not counting the jars inside the jar).
Only trick is some of those NOTICE files are wrong (the rules changed), specifically you only need one "The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/)" entry in there for all of Apache and not one per project.
Going to be using the tool to clean up trunk as well which I think is also in bad shape.
-David
> 2011/9/28 David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
>>
>> Because we've been having troubles getting votes out and we have many more
> coming (hoping to vet 4.0.0-beta-1 up shortly), I hacked up a tool to help.
> The tool will download all the archives from the maven staging repo, unpack
> them and create a little report of what is there:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/orgapacheopenejb-094/archives.html
>>
>> As an example, the standalone zip looks pretty good:
>>
>>
> http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/orgapacheopenejb-094/org.apache.openejb.openejb-standalone.3.0.4.openejb-standalone-3.0.4.zip.licenses.html
>>
>> Notice it will recursively unpack all the jars in a jar.
>>
>> This jar for example ships junit but doesn't declare it in the license.
> In fact it doesn't have a license file of it's own:
>>
>>
> http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/orgapacheopenejb-094/org.apache.openejb.openejb-itests-app.3.0.4.openejb-itests-app-3.0.4.jar.licenses.html
>>
>> Same with this archive:
>>
>>
> http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/orgapacheopenejb-094/org.apache.openejb.openejb-itests-web.3.0.4.openejb-itests-web-3.0.4.war.licenses.html
>>
>> This jar has three license files. Two ASL files an one BSD. If the
> contents were all the same, I personally think it'd be fine -- three
> identical license files is still pretty clear -- but since they're different
> maybe we need to fix it.
>>
>>
> http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/orgapacheopenejb-094/org.apache.openejb.openejb-itests-standalone-client.3.0.4.openejb-itests-standalone-client-3.0.4.jar.licenses.html
>>
>> We could fix the licenses or maybe just drop the itests app, client and
> war.
>>
>>
>> -David
>>
>>
>> On Sep 24, 2011, at 9:14 PM, Ivan wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>> Let's vote for Apache OpenEJB 3.0.4, this release is mostly for the
>>> incoming Geronimo 2.1.8.
>>> Comparing with the last version, only two JIRAs are included :
>>>
>>> OPENEJB-1091: Cause of RollbackException swallowed
>>> OPENEJB-1258 Boolean conversion problem in ejb-jar.xml
>>>
>>> binary repository :
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenejb-094
>>>
>>> source codes :
>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/tags/openejb-3.0.4
>>>
>>> vote artifacts :
>>>
>>> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 approve
>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>>
>>> --
>>> Ivan
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Ivan
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenEJB 3.0.4 (Second Try)
Posted by Ivan <xh...@gmail.com>.
Before I take the next step action, I wonder that those license issues must
be fixed, right ? Also, for each binary file, only one LICENSE file is
required in the META-INF directory, which contains all the licenses, all
those license files,
e.g. openejb-3.0.4/lib/openejb-http-3.0.4.jar.contents/META-INF/LICENSE
should be removed. right ?
Thanks.
2011/9/28 David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
>
> Because we've been having troubles getting votes out and we have many more
coming (hoping to vet 4.0.0-beta-1 up shortly), I hacked up a tool to help.
The tool will download all the archives from the maven staging repo, unpack
them and create a little report of what is there:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/orgapacheopenejb-094/archives.html
>
> As an example, the standalone zip looks pretty good:
>
>
http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/orgapacheopenejb-094/org.apache.openejb.openejb-standalone.3.0.4.openejb-standalone-3.0.4.zip.licenses.html
>
> Notice it will recursively unpack all the jars in a jar.
>
> This jar for example ships junit but doesn't declare it in the license.
In fact it doesn't have a license file of it's own:
>
>
http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/orgapacheopenejb-094/org.apache.openejb.openejb-itests-app.3.0.4.openejb-itests-app-3.0.4.jar.licenses.html
>
> Same with this archive:
>
>
http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/orgapacheopenejb-094/org.apache.openejb.openejb-itests-web.3.0.4.openejb-itests-web-3.0.4.war.licenses.html
>
> This jar has three license files. Two ASL files an one BSD. If the
contents were all the same, I personally think it'd be fine -- three
identical license files is still pretty clear -- but since they're different
maybe we need to fix it.
>
>
http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/orgapacheopenejb-094/org.apache.openejb.openejb-itests-standalone-client.3.0.4.openejb-itests-standalone-client-3.0.4.jar.licenses.html
>
> We could fix the licenses or maybe just drop the itests app, client and
war.
>
>
> -David
>
>
> On Sep 24, 2011, at 9:14 PM, Ivan wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > Let's vote for Apache OpenEJB 3.0.4, this release is mostly for the
> > incoming Geronimo 2.1.8.
> > Comparing with the last version, only two JIRAs are included :
> >
> > OPENEJB-1091: Cause of RollbackException swallowed
> > OPENEJB-1258 Boolean conversion problem in ejb-jar.xml
> >
> > binary repository :
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenejb-094
> >
> > source codes :
> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/tags/openejb-3.0.4
> >
> > vote artifacts :
> >
> > Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> >
> > [ ] +1 approve
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> >
> > --
> > Ivan
>
--
Ivan
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenEJB 3.0.4 (Second Try)
Posted by David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>.
Because we've been having troubles getting votes out and we have many more coming (hoping to vet 4.0.0-beta-1 up shortly), I hacked up a tool to help. The tool will download all the archives from the maven staging repo, unpack them and create a little report of what is there:
http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/orgapacheopenejb-094/archives.html
As an example, the standalone zip looks pretty good:
http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/orgapacheopenejb-094/org.apache.openejb.openejb-standalone.3.0.4.openejb-standalone-3.0.4.zip.licenses.html
Notice it will recursively unpack all the jars in a jar.
This jar for example ships junit but doesn't declare it in the license. In fact it doesn't have a license file of it's own:
http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/orgapacheopenejb-094/org.apache.openejb.openejb-itests-app.3.0.4.openejb-itests-app-3.0.4.jar.licenses.html
Same with this archive:
http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/orgapacheopenejb-094/org.apache.openejb.openejb-itests-web.3.0.4.openejb-itests-web-3.0.4.war.licenses.html
This jar has three license files. Two ASL files an one BSD. If the contents were all the same, I personally think it'd be fine -- three identical license files is still pretty clear -- but since they're different maybe we need to fix it.
http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/orgapacheopenejb-094/org.apache.openejb.openejb-itests-standalone-client.3.0.4.openejb-itests-standalone-client-3.0.4.jar.licenses.html
We could fix the licenses or maybe just drop the itests app, client and war.
-David
On Sep 24, 2011, at 9:14 PM, Ivan wrote:
> Hi,
> Let's vote for Apache OpenEJB 3.0.4, this release is mostly for the
> incoming Geronimo 2.1.8.
> Comparing with the last version, only two JIRAs are included :
>
> OPENEJB-1091: Cause of RollbackException swallowed
> OPENEJB-1258 Boolean conversion problem in ejb-jar.xml
>
> binary repository :
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenejb-094
>
> source codes :
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/tags/openejb-3.0.4
>
> vote artifacts :
>
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
> --
> Ivan
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenEJB 3.0.4 (Second Try)
Posted by Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>.
Hi Ivan,
OK, finally figured what happened.
It was an encoding issue with an ejb-jar.xml file.
Everything seems to work fine.
So, here is my +1.
Sorry for the delay.
Jean-Louis
2011/9/27 Ivan <xh...@gmail.com>
> Hmm, should be no cases fails, for all those cases are run twice in the
> prepare and perform process, and all of them passed for me on my linux box.
>
> 2011/9/27 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
>
> > I checked out from the tag but even with an empty repo, I have some tests
> > failing in one example (injection of env entries).
> > Thank may be due to my environment.
> >
> > Will give it another try.
> >
> > Jean-Louis
> >
> >
> > 2011/9/26 Jacek Laskowski <ja...@japila.pl>
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > Jacek
> > >
> > > On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Ivan <xh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Hi, devs, help to comment it and throw a vote !
> > > >
> > > > 2011/9/25 Jeff Genender <jg...@apache.org>
> > > >
> > > >> +1
> > > >>
> > > >> Jeff
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On Sep 24, 2011, at 10:14 PM, Ivan wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> > Hi,
> > > >> > Let's vote for Apache OpenEJB 3.0.4, this release is mostly for
> > the
> > > >> > incoming Geronimo 2.1.8.
> > > >> > Comparing with the last version, only two JIRAs are included :
> > > >> >
> > > >> > OPENEJB-1091: Cause of RollbackException swallowed
> > > >> > OPENEJB-1258 Boolean conversion problem in ejb-jar.xml
> > > >> >
> > > >> > binary repository :
> > > >> >
> > >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenejb-094
> > > >> >
> > > >> > source codes :
> > > >> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/tags/openejb-3.0.4
> > > >> >
> > > >> > vote artifacts :
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > [ ] +1 approve
> > > >> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > >> > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> > > >> >
> > > >> > --
> > > >> > Ivan
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Ivan
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Jacek Laskowski
> > > Java EE, functional languages and IBM WebSphere -
> http://blog.japila.pl
> > > Warszawa JUG conference = Confitura (formerly Javarsovia) ::
> > > http://confitura.pl
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Ivan
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenEJB 3.0.4 (Second Try)
Posted by Ivan <xh...@gmail.com>.
Hmm, should be no cases fails, for all those cases are run twice in the
prepare and perform process, and all of them passed for me on my linux box.
2011/9/27 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
> I checked out from the tag but even with an empty repo, I have some tests
> failing in one example (injection of env entries).
> Thank may be due to my environment.
>
> Will give it another try.
>
> Jean-Louis
>
>
> 2011/9/26 Jacek Laskowski <ja...@japila.pl>
>
> > +1
> >
> > Jacek
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Ivan <xh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Hi, devs, help to comment it and throw a vote !
> > >
> > > 2011/9/25 Jeff Genender <jg...@apache.org>
> > >
> > >> +1
> > >>
> > >> Jeff
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Sep 24, 2011, at 10:14 PM, Ivan wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Hi,
> > >> > Let's vote for Apache OpenEJB 3.0.4, this release is mostly for
> the
> > >> > incoming Geronimo 2.1.8.
> > >> > Comparing with the last version, only two JIRAs are included :
> > >> >
> > >> > OPENEJB-1091: Cause of RollbackException swallowed
> > >> > OPENEJB-1258 Boolean conversion problem in ejb-jar.xml
> > >> >
> > >> > binary repository :
> > >> >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenejb-094
> > >> >
> > >> > source codes :
> > >> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/tags/openejb-3.0.4
> > >> >
> > >> > vote artifacts :
> > >> >
> > >> > Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> > >> >
> > >> > [ ] +1 approve
> > >> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > >> > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> > >> >
> > >> > --
> > >> > Ivan
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Ivan
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Jacek Laskowski
> > Java EE, functional languages and IBM WebSphere - http://blog.japila.pl
> > Warszawa JUG conference = Confitura (formerly Javarsovia) ::
> > http://confitura.pl
> >
>
--
Ivan
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenEJB 3.0.4 (Second Try)
Posted by Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>.
I checked out from the tag but even with an empty repo, I have some tests
failing in one example (injection of env entries).
Thank may be due to my environment.
Will give it another try.
Jean-Louis
2011/9/26 Jacek Laskowski <ja...@japila.pl>
> +1
>
> Jacek
>
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Ivan <xh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi, devs, help to comment it and throw a vote !
> >
> > 2011/9/25 Jeff Genender <jg...@apache.org>
> >
> >> +1
> >>
> >> Jeff
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sep 24, 2011, at 10:14 PM, Ivan wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hi,
> >> > Let's vote for Apache OpenEJB 3.0.4, this release is mostly for the
> >> > incoming Geronimo 2.1.8.
> >> > Comparing with the last version, only two JIRAs are included :
> >> >
> >> > OPENEJB-1091: Cause of RollbackException swallowed
> >> > OPENEJB-1258 Boolean conversion problem in ejb-jar.xml
> >> >
> >> > binary repository :
> >> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenejb-094
> >> >
> >> > source codes :
> >> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/tags/openejb-3.0.4
> >> >
> >> > vote artifacts :
> >> >
> >> > Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> >> >
> >> > [ ] +1 approve
> >> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> >> > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Ivan
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Ivan
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Jacek Laskowski
> Java EE, functional languages and IBM WebSphere - http://blog.japila.pl
> Warszawa JUG conference = Confitura (formerly Javarsovia) ::
> http://confitura.pl
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenEJB 3.0.4 (Second Try)
Posted by Jacek Laskowski <ja...@japila.pl>.
+1
Jacek
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Ivan <xh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, devs, help to comment it and throw a vote !
>
> 2011/9/25 Jeff Genender <jg...@apache.org>
>
>> +1
>>
>> Jeff
>>
>>
>> On Sep 24, 2011, at 10:14 PM, Ivan wrote:
>>
>> > Hi,
>> > Let's vote for Apache OpenEJB 3.0.4, this release is mostly for the
>> > incoming Geronimo 2.1.8.
>> > Comparing with the last version, only two JIRAs are included :
>> >
>> > OPENEJB-1091: Cause of RollbackException swallowed
>> > OPENEJB-1258 Boolean conversion problem in ejb-jar.xml
>> >
>> > binary repository :
>> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenejb-094
>> >
>> > source codes :
>> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/tags/openejb-3.0.4
>> >
>> > vote artifacts :
>> >
>> > Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>> >
>> > [ ] +1 approve
>> > [ ] +0 no opinion
>> > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>> >
>> > --
>> > Ivan
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Ivan
>
--
Jacek Laskowski
Java EE, functional languages and IBM WebSphere - http://blog.japila.pl
Warszawa JUG conference = Confitura (formerly Javarsovia) :: http://confitura.pl
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenEJB 3.0.4 (Second Try)
Posted by Ivan <xh...@gmail.com>.
Hi, devs, help to comment it and throw a vote !
2011/9/25 Jeff Genender <jg...@apache.org>
> +1
>
> Jeff
>
>
> On Sep 24, 2011, at 10:14 PM, Ivan wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > Let's vote for Apache OpenEJB 3.0.4, this release is mostly for the
> > incoming Geronimo 2.1.8.
> > Comparing with the last version, only two JIRAs are included :
> >
> > OPENEJB-1091: Cause of RollbackException swallowed
> > OPENEJB-1258 Boolean conversion problem in ejb-jar.xml
> >
> > binary repository :
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenejb-094
> >
> > source codes :
> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/tags/openejb-3.0.4
> >
> > vote artifacts :
> >
> > Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> >
> > [ ] +1 approve
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> >
> > --
> > Ivan
>
>
--
Ivan
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenEJB 3.0.4 (Second Try)
Posted by Jeff Genender <jg...@apache.org>.
+1
Jeff
On Sep 24, 2011, at 10:14 PM, Ivan wrote:
> Hi,
> Let's vote for Apache OpenEJB 3.0.4, this release is mostly for the
> incoming Geronimo 2.1.8.
> Comparing with the last version, only two JIRAs are included :
>
> OPENEJB-1091: Cause of RollbackException swallowed
> OPENEJB-1258 Boolean conversion problem in ejb-jar.xml
>
> binary repository :
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenejb-094
>
> source codes :
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/tags/openejb-3.0.4
>
> vote artifacts :
>
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
> --
> Ivan