You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@felix.apache.org by Sahoo <sa...@oracle.com> on 2013/02/11 06:01:51 UTC

Felix 4.2.0 and R5 core spec

Does Felix 4.2.0 not include all of R5 core APIs? I am assuming it also 
implements them. If so, why should it not be called an R5 framework?

Thanks,
Sahoo

Re: Felix 4.2.0 and R5 core spec

Posted by "Richard S. Hall" <he...@ungoverned.org>.
On 2/11/13 09:14 , Sahoo wrote:
> How does one know which are partially implemented vs. fully 
> implemented? Is it documented anywhere?

There was no attempt to implement any of the R5 API because I didn't 
personally have the time to do it. This was just an attempt to move to 
the R5 API to make it easier for people to submit patches for R5 
functionality.

Luckily, there isn't much new for the framework to implement in R5, but 
no where have we claimed that 4.2.0 is an R5 framework. It still passes 
the R4.3 CT (except for signature tests) and it hasn't been run on the 
R5 CT.

-> richard

>
> Thanks,
> Sahoo
>
> On Monday 11 February 2013 04:44 PM, Karl Pauls wrote:
>> We do use the R5 api and implement parts of it but I don't think we 
>> are implementing all of it yet...
>>
>> regards,
>>
>> Karl
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 6:01 AM, Sahoo <sanjeeb.sahoo@oracle.com 
>> <ma...@oracle.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     Does Felix 4.2.0 not include all of R5 core APIs? I am assuming it
>>     also implements them. If so, why should it not be called an R5
>>     framework?
>>
>>     Thanks,
>>     Sahoo
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Karl Pauls
>> karlpauls@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>
>> http://twitter.com/karlpauls
>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/karlpauls
>> https://profiles.google.com/karlpauls
>
>

Re: Felix 4.2.0 and R5 core spec

Posted by Sahoo <sa...@oracle.com>.
How does one know which are partially implemented vs. fully implemented? 
Is it documented anywhere?

Thanks,
Sahoo

On Monday 11 February 2013 04:44 PM, Karl Pauls wrote:
> We do use the R5 api and implement parts of it but I don't think we 
> are implementing all of it yet...
>
> regards,
>
> Karl
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 6:01 AM, Sahoo <sanjeeb.sahoo@oracle.com 
> <ma...@oracle.com>> wrote:
>
>     Does Felix 4.2.0 not include all of R5 core APIs? I am assuming it
>     also implements them. If so, why should it not be called an R5
>     framework?
>
>     Thanks,
>     Sahoo
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Karl Pauls
> karlpauls@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>
> http://twitter.com/karlpauls
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/karlpauls
> https://profiles.google.com/karlpauls

Re: Felix 4.2.0 and R5 core spec

Posted by Karl Pauls <ka...@gmail.com>.
We do use the R5 api and implement parts of it but I don't think we are
implementing all of it yet...

regards,

Karl


On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 6:01 AM, Sahoo <sa...@oracle.com> wrote:

> Does Felix 4.2.0 not include all of R5 core APIs? I am assuming it also
> implements them. If so, why should it not be called an R5 framework?
>
> Thanks,
> Sahoo
>



-- 
Karl Pauls
karlpauls@gmail.com
http://twitter.com/karlpauls
http://www.linkedin.com/in/karlpauls
https://profiles.google.com/karlpauls