You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@curator.apache.org by Jordan Zimmerman <ra...@apache.org> on 2015/01/13 14:40:59 UTC
[VOTE] Release Apache Curator version 2.7.1 #2
Hello,
This is the 2nd vote for Apache Curator version 2.7.1
*** Please download, test and vote within approx. 72 hours
Note that we are voting upon the source (tag) and binaries are
provided for convenience.
Link to release notes:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314425&version=12328938
Staging repo:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/curator/2.7.1/
Binary artifacts:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecurator-1009/
The tag to be voted upon:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=curator.git;a=tag;h=ba9fb60c5463e21199cb8719cc537ccf8a7f2a1e
Curator's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
http://www.apache.org/dist/curator/KEYS
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Curator version 2.7.1 #2
Posted by Jordan Zimmerman <jo...@jordanzimmerman.com>.
Either way, let’s have a Jira for this.
On January 16, 2015 at 2:27:02 PM, Scott Blum (dragonsinth@gmail.com) wrote:
No, I probably should have created one, but I just pushed the fix without one. Should I go back and submit one, or Jason would you like to do the honors? It was a good find! https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CURATOR
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <jo...@jordanzimmerman.com> wrote:
Is there a Jira for this fix?
-JZ
On January 16, 2015 at 12:47:51 AM, Scott Blum (dragonsinth@gmail.com) wrote:
+0
FYI, I just pushed a fix to the new TreeCache. It wasn't properly handling
the case where the root node was deleted then re-created, which seems
pretty problematic for the single-node (max depth 0) case.
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 11:48 PM, Jay Zarfoss <za...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Eric Tschetter <ec...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 1:45 PM, Cameron McKenzie
> > <mc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > +1
> > >
> > > Tests are all good for me now.
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 12:40 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <
> randgalt@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hello,
> > >>
> > >> This is the 2nd vote for Apache Curator version 2.7.1
> > >>
> > >> *** Please download, test and vote within approx. 72 hours
> > >>
> > >> Note that we are voting upon the source (tag) and binaries are
> > >> provided for convenience.
> > >>
> > >> Link to release notes:
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314425&version=12328938
> > >>
> > >> Staging repo:
> > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/curator/2.7.1/
> > >>
> > >> Binary artifacts:
> > >>
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecurator-1009/
> > >>
> > >> The tag to be voted upon:
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=curator.git;a=tag;h=ba9fb60c5463e21199cb8719cc537ccf8a7f2a1e
> > >>
> > >> Curator's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
> > >> http://www.apache.org/dist/curator/KEYS
> > >>
> > >> [ ] +1 approve
> > >> [ ] +0 no opinion
> > >> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> > >>
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Curator version 2.7.1 #2
Posted by Scott Blum <dr...@gmail.com>.
No, I probably should have created one, but I just pushed the fix without
one. Should I go back and submit one, or Jason would you like to do the
honors? It was a good find! https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CURATOR
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <
jordan@jordanzimmerman.com> wrote:
> Is there a Jira for this fix?
>
> -JZ
>
>
>
> On January 16, 2015 at 12:47:51 AM, Scott Blum (dragonsinth@gmail.com)
> wrote:
>
> +0
>
> FYI, I just pushed a fix to the new TreeCache. It wasn't properly handling
> the case where the root node was deleted then re-created, which seems
> pretty problematic for the single-node (max depth 0) case.
>
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 11:48 PM, Jay Zarfoss <za...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Eric Tschetter <ec...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 1:45 PM, Cameron McKenzie
> > > <mc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > Tests are all good for me now.
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 12:40 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <
> > randgalt@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Hello,
> > > >>
> > > >> This is the 2nd vote for Apache Curator version 2.7.1
> > > >>
> > > >> *** Please download, test and vote within approx. 72 hours
> > > >>
> > > >> Note that we are voting upon the source (tag) and binaries are
> > > >> provided for convenience.
> > > >>
> > > >> Link to release notes:
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314425&version=12328938
> > > >>
> > > >> Staging repo:
> > > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/curator/2.7.1/
> > > >>
> > > >> Binary artifacts:
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecurator-1009/
> > > >>
> > > >> The tag to be voted upon:
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=curator.git;a=tag;h=ba9fb60c5463e21199cb8719cc537ccf8a7f2a1e
> > > >>
> > > >> Curator's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
> > > >> http://www.apache.org/dist/curator/KEYS
> > > >>
> > > >> [ ] +1 approve
> > > >> [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > >> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> > > >>
> > >
> >
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Curator version 2.7.1 #2
Posted by Jordan Zimmerman <jo...@jordanzimmerman.com>.
Is there a Jira for this fix?
-JZ
On January 16, 2015 at 12:47:51 AM, Scott Blum (dragonsinth@gmail.com) wrote:
+0
FYI, I just pushed a fix to the new TreeCache. It wasn't properly handling
the case where the root node was deleted then re-created, which seems
pretty problematic for the single-node (max depth 0) case.
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 11:48 PM, Jay Zarfoss <za...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Eric Tschetter <ec...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 1:45 PM, Cameron McKenzie
> > <mc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > +1
> > >
> > > Tests are all good for me now.
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 12:40 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <
> randgalt@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hello,
> > >>
> > >> This is the 2nd vote for Apache Curator version 2.7.1
> > >>
> > >> *** Please download, test and vote within approx. 72 hours
> > >>
> > >> Note that we are voting upon the source (tag) and binaries are
> > >> provided for convenience.
> > >>
> > >> Link to release notes:
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314425&version=12328938
> > >>
> > >> Staging repo:
> > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/curator/2.7.1/
> > >>
> > >> Binary artifacts:
> > >>
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecurator-1009/
> > >>
> > >> The tag to be voted upon:
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=curator.git;a=tag;h=ba9fb60c5463e21199cb8719cc537ccf8a7f2a1e
> > >>
> > >> Curator's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
> > >> http://www.apache.org/dist/curator/KEYS
> > >>
> > >> [ ] +1 approve
> > >> [ ] +0 no opinion
> > >> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> > >>
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Curator version 2.7.1 #2
Posted by Jordan Zimmerman <jo...@jordanzimmerman.com>.
OK - I’ll complete the release and then we can do another.
-JZ
On January 16, 2015 at 5:43:55 AM, Scott Blum (dragonsinth@gmail.com) wrote:
It's not a regression from 2.7.0 so my thought would be probably not, but
if there are other reasons to re-spin it'd be a nice to have.
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 1:55 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <
jordan@jordanzimmerman.com> wrote:
> Is it serious enough that we should redo the release?
>
> ====================
> Jordan Zimmerman
>
> > On Jan 16, 2015, at 12:46 AM, Scott Blum <dr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > +0
> >
> > FYI, I just pushed a fix to the new TreeCache. It wasn't properly
> handling
> > the case where the root node was deleted then re-created, which seems
> > pretty problematic for the single-node (max depth 0) case.
> >
> >> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 11:48 PM, Jay Zarfoss <za...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> +1
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Eric Tschetter <ec...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> +1
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 1:45 PM, Cameron McKenzie
> >>> <mc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> +1
> >>>>
> >>>> Tests are all good for me now.
> >>>>
> >>>> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 12:40 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <
> >> randgalt@apache.org>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Hello,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This is the 2nd vote for Apache Curator version 2.7.1
> >>>>>
> >>>>> *** Please download, test and vote within approx. 72 hours
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Note that we are voting upon the source (tag) and binaries are
> >>>>> provided for convenience.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Link to release notes:
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314425&version=12328938
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Staging repo:
> >>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/curator/2.7.1/
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Binary artifacts:
> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecurator-1009/
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The tag to be voted upon:
> >>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=curator.git;a=tag;h=ba9fb60c5463e21199cb8719cc537ccf8a7f2a1e
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Curator's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
> >>>>> http://www.apache.org/dist/curator/KEYS
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [ ] +1 approve
> >>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
> >>>>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> >>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Curator version 2.7.1 #2
Posted by Scott Blum <dr...@gmail.com>.
It's not a regression from 2.7.0 so my thought would be probably not, but
if there are other reasons to re-spin it'd be a nice to have.
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 1:55 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <
jordan@jordanzimmerman.com> wrote:
> Is it serious enough that we should redo the release?
>
> ====================
> Jordan Zimmerman
>
> > On Jan 16, 2015, at 12:46 AM, Scott Blum <dr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > +0
> >
> > FYI, I just pushed a fix to the new TreeCache. It wasn't properly
> handling
> > the case where the root node was deleted then re-created, which seems
> > pretty problematic for the single-node (max depth 0) case.
> >
> >> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 11:48 PM, Jay Zarfoss <za...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> +1
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Eric Tschetter <ec...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> +1
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 1:45 PM, Cameron McKenzie
> >>> <mc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> +1
> >>>>
> >>>> Tests are all good for me now.
> >>>>
> >>>> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 12:40 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <
> >> randgalt@apache.org>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Hello,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This is the 2nd vote for Apache Curator version 2.7.1
> >>>>>
> >>>>> *** Please download, test and vote within approx. 72 hours
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Note that we are voting upon the source (tag) and binaries are
> >>>>> provided for convenience.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Link to release notes:
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314425&version=12328938
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Staging repo:
> >>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/curator/2.7.1/
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Binary artifacts:
> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecurator-1009/
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The tag to be voted upon:
> >>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=curator.git;a=tag;h=ba9fb60c5463e21199cb8719cc537ccf8a7f2a1e
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Curator's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
> >>>>> http://www.apache.org/dist/curator/KEYS
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [ ] +1 approve
> >>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
> >>>>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> >>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Curator version 2.7.1 #2
Posted by Jordan Zimmerman <jo...@jordanzimmerman.com>.
Is it serious enough that we should redo the release?
====================
Jordan Zimmerman
> On Jan 16, 2015, at 12:46 AM, Scott Blum <dr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +0
>
> FYI, I just pushed a fix to the new TreeCache. It wasn't properly handling
> the case where the root node was deleted then re-created, which seems
> pretty problematic for the single-node (max depth 0) case.
>
>> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 11:48 PM, Jay Zarfoss <za...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> +1
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Eric Tschetter <ec...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 1:45 PM, Cameron McKenzie
>>> <mc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> Tests are all good for me now.
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 12:40 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <
>> randgalt@apache.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> This is the 2nd vote for Apache Curator version 2.7.1
>>>>>
>>>>> *** Please download, test and vote within approx. 72 hours
>>>>>
>>>>> Note that we are voting upon the source (tag) and binaries are
>>>>> provided for convenience.
>>>>>
>>>>> Link to release notes:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314425&version=12328938
>>>>>
>>>>> Staging repo:
>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/curator/2.7.1/
>>>>>
>>>>> Binary artifacts:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecurator-1009/
>>>>>
>>>>> The tag to be voted upon:
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=curator.git;a=tag;h=ba9fb60c5463e21199cb8719cc537ccf8a7f2a1e
>>>>>
>>>>> Curator's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
>>>>> http://www.apache.org/dist/curator/KEYS
>>>>>
>>>>> [ ] +1 approve
>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>>>>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Curator version 2.7.1 #2
Posted by Scott Blum <dr...@gmail.com>.
+0
FYI, I just pushed a fix to the new TreeCache. It wasn't properly handling
the case where the root node was deleted then re-created, which seems
pretty problematic for the single-node (max depth 0) case.
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 11:48 PM, Jay Zarfoss <za...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Eric Tschetter <ec...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 1:45 PM, Cameron McKenzie
> > <mc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > +1
> > >
> > > Tests are all good for me now.
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 12:40 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <
> randgalt@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hello,
> > >>
> > >> This is the 2nd vote for Apache Curator version 2.7.1
> > >>
> > >> *** Please download, test and vote within approx. 72 hours
> > >>
> > >> Note that we are voting upon the source (tag) and binaries are
> > >> provided for convenience.
> > >>
> > >> Link to release notes:
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314425&version=12328938
> > >>
> > >> Staging repo:
> > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/curator/2.7.1/
> > >>
> > >> Binary artifacts:
> > >>
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecurator-1009/
> > >>
> > >> The tag to be voted upon:
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=curator.git;a=tag;h=ba9fb60c5463e21199cb8719cc537ccf8a7f2a1e
> > >>
> > >> Curator's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
> > >> http://www.apache.org/dist/curator/KEYS
> > >>
> > >> [ ] +1 approve
> > >> [ ] +0 no opinion
> > >> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> > >>
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Curator version 2.7.1 #2
Posted by Jay Zarfoss <za...@apache.org>.
+1
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Eric Tschetter <ec...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 1:45 PM, Cameron McKenzie
> <mc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > Tests are all good for me now.
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 12:40 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <ra...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> This is the 2nd vote for Apache Curator version 2.7.1
> >>
> >> *** Please download, test and vote within approx. 72 hours
> >>
> >> Note that we are voting upon the source (tag) and binaries are
> >> provided for convenience.
> >>
> >> Link to release notes:
> >>
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314425&version=12328938
> >>
> >> Staging repo:
> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/curator/2.7.1/
> >>
> >> Binary artifacts:
> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecurator-1009/
> >>
> >> The tag to be voted upon:
> >>
> >>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=curator.git;a=tag;h=ba9fb60c5463e21199cb8719cc537ccf8a7f2a1e
> >>
> >> Curator's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
> >> http://www.apache.org/dist/curator/KEYS
> >>
> >> [ ] +1 approve
> >> [ ] +0 no opinion
> >> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> >>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Curator version 2.7.1 #2
Posted by Eric Tschetter <ec...@gmail.com>.
+1
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 1:45 PM, Cameron McKenzie
<mc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> Tests are all good for me now.
>
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 12:40 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <ra...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> This is the 2nd vote for Apache Curator version 2.7.1
>>
>> *** Please download, test and vote within approx. 72 hours
>>
>> Note that we are voting upon the source (tag) and binaries are
>> provided for convenience.
>>
>> Link to release notes:
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314425&version=12328938
>>
>> Staging repo:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/curator/2.7.1/
>>
>> Binary artifacts:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecurator-1009/
>>
>> The tag to be voted upon:
>>
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=curator.git;a=tag;h=ba9fb60c5463e21199cb8719cc537ccf8a7f2a1e
>>
>> Curator's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
>> http://www.apache.org/dist/curator/KEYS
>>
>> [ ] +1 approve
>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Curator version 2.7.1 #2
Posted by Cameron McKenzie <mc...@gmail.com>.
+1
Tests are all good for me now.
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 12:40 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <ra...@apache.org>
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This is the 2nd vote for Apache Curator version 2.7.1
>
> *** Please download, test and vote within approx. 72 hours
>
> Note that we are voting upon the source (tag) and binaries are
> provided for convenience.
>
> Link to release notes:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314425&version=12328938
>
> Staging repo:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/curator/2.7.1/
>
> Binary artifacts:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecurator-1009/
>
> The tag to be voted upon:
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=curator.git;a=tag;h=ba9fb60c5463e21199cb8719cc537ccf8a7f2a1e
>
> Curator's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
> http://www.apache.org/dist/curator/KEYS
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>