You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by "Walter Underwood (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/05/07 20:21:00 UTC

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SOLR-629) Fuzzy search with DisMax request handler

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-629?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14533128#comment-14533128 ] 

Walter Underwood edited comment on SOLR-629 at 5/7/15 6:20 PM:
---------------------------------------------------------------

We could still use ~ for fuzzy in qf, or we could choose a different character.

Slop is meaningless for single term matching, like qf.


was (Author: wunder):
We could still use ~ for fuzzy in qf, or we could choose a different character.

> Fuzzy search with DisMax request handler
> ----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-629
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-629
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: query parsers
>    Affects Versions: 1.3
>            Reporter: Guillaume Smet
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: SOLR-629.patch, SOLR-629.patch, dismax_fuzzy_query_field.v0.1.diff, dismax_fuzzy_query_field.v0.1.diff
>
>
> The DisMax search handler doesn't support fuzzy queries which would be quite useful for our usage of Solr and from what I've seen on the list, it's something several people would like to have.
> Following this discussion http://markmail.org/message/tx6kqr7ga6ponefa#query:solr%20dismax%20fuzzy+page:1+mid:c4pciq6rlr4dwtgm+state:results , I added the ability to add fuzzy query field in the qf parameter. I kept the patch as conservative as possible.
> The syntax supported is: fieldOne^2.3 fieldTwo~0.3 fieldThree~0.2^-0.4 fieldFour as discussed in the above thread.
> The recursive query aliasing should work even with fuzzy query fields using a very simple rule: the aliased fields inherit the minSimilarity of their parent, combined with their own one if they have one.
> Only the qf parameter support this syntax atm. I suppose we should make it usable in pf too. Any opinion?
> Comments are very welcome, I'll spend the time needed to put this patch in good shape.
> Thanks.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org