You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by jim ferenczi <ji...@apache.org> on 2019/03/07 16:53:11 UTC
[VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.0.0 RC3
Please vote for release candidate 3 for Lucene/Solr 8.0.0
The artifacts can be downloaded from
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.0.0-RC3-reva9d80bf18af04850ea21dcf88a40367559fb246e
You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py
*https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.0.0-RC3-reva9d80bf18af04850ea21dcf88a40367559fb246e
<https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.0.0-RC3-reva9d80bf18af04850ea21dcf88a40367559fb246e>*
Here’s my +1
SUCCESS! [1:14:08.843490]
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.0.0 RC3
Posted by Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com>.
It's not clear whether you are only asking for a backport or also for a respin.
I'm reluctant to respin: we built the first release candidate more
than 3 week ago now and have had to postpone it since then because of
late bugs. This is asking too much to the release manager in my
opinion. I am +1 to backport this change so that it makes it to 8.0.1,
or 8.0 if we decide to respin for another bug, but I think it's time
to raise the bar in terms of what bugs should be considered blockers
for 8.0.
On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 7:51 PM Noble Paul <no...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I would like to backport SOLR-13285
>
> On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 3:53 AM jim ferenczi <ji...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Please vote for release candidate 3 for Lucene/Solr 8.0.0
> >
> > The artifacts can be downloaded from https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.0.0-RC3-reva9d80bf18af04850ea21dcf88a40367559fb246e
> > You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
> > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.0.0-RC3-reva9d80bf18af04850ea21dcf88a40367559fb246e
> >
> > Here’s my +1
> > SUCCESS! [1:14:08.843490]
>
>
>
> --
> -----------------------------------------------------
> Noble Paul
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
--
Adrien
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.0.0 RC3
Posted by Noble Paul <no...@gmail.com>.
I would like to backport SOLR-13285
On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 3:53 AM jim ferenczi <ji...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Please vote for release candidate 3 for Lucene/Solr 8.0.0
>
> The artifacts can be downloaded from https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.0.0-RC3-reva9d80bf18af04850ea21dcf88a40367559fb246e
> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.0.0-RC3-reva9d80bf18af04850ea21dcf88a40367559fb246e
>
> Here’s my +1
> SUCCESS! [1:14:08.843490]
--
-----------------------------------------------------
Noble Paul
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.0.0 RC3
Posted by Furkan KAMACI <fu...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
Sorry, but I also think that we should respin it if we can instead of
running a release of 8.0.1.
Kind Regards,
Furkan KAMACI
On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 10:24 AM Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net> wrote:
> Having done these releases more than a few times, I completely understand
> the frustration caused by such delays but I think that SOLR-13285 is
> something that really breaks Solr in a major version release. We can always
> have a 8.0.1 release that fixes it but I feel like it would not be a good
> thing to offer an 8.0.0 version to end-users knowing that it would cause
> issues for anyone using enum fields.
>
> I am sorry that it would require more time and effort at the end of the RM
> but In my opinion, this is worth a respin.
>
> Anshum
>
> On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 10:52 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
> ichattopadhyaya@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> In case we go through with this RC, I can volunteer to release a 8.0.1
>> (with SOLR-13285) immediately after 8.0.0 release.
>> @Adrien, Jim, I really understand the frustrations of an RM, and I also
>> apologize for the delay I caused to this release due to the intermediate
>> 7.7.1 release where I didn't do it as quickly as I could have (delay in
>> building the RC, delay in backporting the backward compatibility indexes
>> etc).
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 10:52 AM Tomás Fernández Löbbe <
>> tomasflobbe@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I understand the frustration with the delay and the number of respins,
>>> and I don't want to be disrespectful of Jim's time as RC, but from what I
>>> can see, SOLR-13285 would prevent anyone with enum fields to use Solr 8.0,
>>> and the fix is already available.
>>>
>>> -0
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 2:14 PM Nhat Nguyen
>>> <nh...@elastic.co.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 SUCCESS! [0:54:05.261238]
>>>>
>>>> > On Mar 7, 2019, at 4:44 PM, Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > +1 SUCCESS! [1:25:54.239684]
>>>> >
>>>> > On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 5:53 PM jim ferenczi <ji...@apache.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Please vote for release candidate 3 for Lucene/Solr 8.0.0
>>>> >>
>>>> >> The artifacts can be downloaded from
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.0.0-RC3-reva9d80bf18af04850ea21dcf88a40367559fb246e
>>>> >> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>>>> >> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.0.0-RC3-reva9d80bf18af04850ea21dcf88a40367559fb246e
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Here’s my +1
>>>> >> SUCCESS! [1:14:08.843490]
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > --
>>>> > Adrien
>>>> >
>>>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.0.0 RC3
Posted by Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>.
I've backported and pushed SOLR-13285 to branch_8_0 (
https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=lucene-solr.git;h=2ae4746). Ran all
tests and precommit.
Good luck, and hopefully this is it! Thank you once again for the patience,
Jim.
On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 12:59 AM jim ferenczi <ji...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks !
>
> Le ven. 8 mars 2019 à 09:58, Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net> a
> écrit :
>
>> I've back ported the commit. Just running the tests now and will commit
>> as soon as the tests pass.
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 12:34 AM jim ferenczi <ji...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I agree, let's respin today and initiate a new vote. Do we have a
>>> volunteer for the backport or should I do it ?
>>>
>>> Le ven. 8 mars 2019 à 09:03, Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>>>
>>>> Since there is already a fix as Tomás mentioned, can someone backport
>>>> it to branch_8_0 so that we can try to get a new RC out today?
>>>>
>>>> @Ishan Chattopadhyaya No worry at all, thanks for taking care of
>>>> getting 7.7.1 out.
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 8:24 AM Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > Having done these releases more than a few times, I completely
>>>> understand the frustration caused by such delays but I think that
>>>> SOLR-13285 is something that really breaks Solr in a major version release.
>>>> We can always have a 8.0.1 release that fixes it but I feel like it would
>>>> not be a good thing to offer an 8.0.0 version to end-users knowing that it
>>>> would cause issues for anyone using enum fields.
>>>> >
>>>> > I am sorry that it would require more time and effort at the end of
>>>> the RM but In my opinion, this is worth a respin.
>>>> >
>>>> > Anshum
>>>> >
>>>> > On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 10:52 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
>>>> ichattopadhyaya@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >> In case we go through with this RC, I can volunteer to release a
>>>> 8.0.1 (with SOLR-13285) immediately after 8.0.0 release.
>>>> >> @Adrien, Jim, I really understand the frustrations of an RM, and I
>>>> also apologize for the delay I caused to this release due to the
>>>> intermediate 7.7.1 release where I didn't do it as quickly as I could have
>>>> (delay in building the RC, delay in backporting the backward compatibility
>>>> indexes etc).
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 10:52 AM Tomás Fernández Löbbe <
>>>> tomasflobbe@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> I understand the frustration with the delay and the number of
>>>> respins, and I don't want to be disrespectful of Jim's time as RC, but from
>>>> what I can see, SOLR-13285 would prevent anyone with enum fields to use
>>>> Solr 8.0, and the fix is already available.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> -0
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 2:14 PM Nhat Nguyen <nh...@elastic.co.invalid>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> +1 SUCCESS! [0:54:05.261238]
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> > On Mar 7, 2019, at 4:44 PM, Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >>>> >
>>>> >>>> > +1 SUCCESS! [1:25:54.239684]
>>>> >>>> >
>>>> >>>> > On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 5:53 PM jim ferenczi <ji...@apache.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >>>> >>
>>>> >>>> >> Please vote for release candidate 3 for Lucene/Solr 8.0.0
>>>> >>>> >>
>>>> >>>> >> The artifacts can be downloaded from
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.0.0-RC3-reva9d80bf18af04850ea21dcf88a40367559fb246e
>>>> >>>> >> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>>>> >>>> >> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.0.0-RC3-reva9d80bf18af04850ea21dcf88a40367559fb246e
>>>> >>>> >>
>>>> >>>> >> Here’s my +1
>>>> >>>> >> SUCCESS! [1:14:08.843490]
>>>> >>>> >
>>>> >>>> >
>>>> >>>> >
>>>> >>>> > --
>>>> >>>> > Adrien
>>>> >>>> >
>>>> >>>> >
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> >>>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>>> >>>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>> >>>> >
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>>> >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>> >>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Adrien
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
--
Anshum Gupta
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.0.0 RC3
Posted by jim ferenczi <ji...@gmail.com>.
Thanks !
Le ven. 8 mars 2019 à 09:58, Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net> a écrit :
> I've back ported the commit. Just running the tests now and will commit as
> soon as the tests pass.
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 12:34 AM jim ferenczi <ji...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I agree, let's respin today and initiate a new vote. Do we have a
>> volunteer for the backport or should I do it ?
>>
>> Le ven. 8 mars 2019 à 09:03, Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>>
>>> Since there is already a fix as Tomás mentioned, can someone backport
>>> it to branch_8_0 so that we can try to get a new RC out today?
>>>
>>> @Ishan Chattopadhyaya No worry at all, thanks for taking care of
>>> getting 7.7.1 out.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 8:24 AM Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Having done these releases more than a few times, I completely
>>> understand the frustration caused by such delays but I think that
>>> SOLR-13285 is something that really breaks Solr in a major version release.
>>> We can always have a 8.0.1 release that fixes it but I feel like it would
>>> not be a good thing to offer an 8.0.0 version to end-users knowing that it
>>> would cause issues for anyone using enum fields.
>>> >
>>> > I am sorry that it would require more time and effort at the end of
>>> the RM but In my opinion, this is worth a respin.
>>> >
>>> > Anshum
>>> >
>>> > On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 10:52 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
>>> ichattopadhyaya@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> In case we go through with this RC, I can volunteer to release a
>>> 8.0.1 (with SOLR-13285) immediately after 8.0.0 release.
>>> >> @Adrien, Jim, I really understand the frustrations of an RM, and I
>>> also apologize for the delay I caused to this release due to the
>>> intermediate 7.7.1 release where I didn't do it as quickly as I could have
>>> (delay in building the RC, delay in backporting the backward compatibility
>>> indexes etc).
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 10:52 AM Tomás Fernández Löbbe <
>>> tomasflobbe@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> I understand the frustration with the delay and the number of
>>> respins, and I don't want to be disrespectful of Jim's time as RC, but from
>>> what I can see, SOLR-13285 would prevent anyone with enum fields to use
>>> Solr 8.0, and the fix is already available.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> -0
>>> >>>
>>> >>> On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 2:14 PM Nhat Nguyen <nh...@elastic.co.invalid>
>>> wrote:
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> +1 SUCCESS! [0:54:05.261238]
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> > On Mar 7, 2019, at 4:44 PM, Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >>>> >
>>> >>>> > +1 SUCCESS! [1:25:54.239684]
>>> >>>> >
>>> >>>> > On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 5:53 PM jim ferenczi <ji...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>> >>>> >>
>>> >>>> >> Please vote for release candidate 3 for Lucene/Solr 8.0.0
>>> >>>> >>
>>> >>>> >> The artifacts can be downloaded from
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.0.0-RC3-reva9d80bf18af04850ea21dcf88a40367559fb246e
>>> >>>> >> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>>> >>>> >> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.0.0-RC3-reva9d80bf18af04850ea21dcf88a40367559fb246e
>>> >>>> >>
>>> >>>> >> Here’s my +1
>>> >>>> >> SUCCESS! [1:14:08.843490]
>>> >>>> >
>>> >>>> >
>>> >>>> >
>>> >>>> > --
>>> >>>> > Adrien
>>> >>>> >
>>> >>>> >
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> >>>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>> >>>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>> >>>> >
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>> >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>> >>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Adrien
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>
>>>
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.0.0 RC3
Posted by Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>.
I've back ported the commit. Just running the tests now and will commit as
soon as the tests pass.
On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 12:34 AM jim ferenczi <ji...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I agree, let's respin today and initiate a new vote. Do we have a
> volunteer for the backport or should I do it ?
>
> Le ven. 8 mars 2019 à 09:03, Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>
>> Since there is already a fix as Tomás mentioned, can someone backport
>> it to branch_8_0 so that we can try to get a new RC out today?
>>
>> @Ishan Chattopadhyaya No worry at all, thanks for taking care of
>> getting 7.7.1 out.
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 8:24 AM Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Having done these releases more than a few times, I completely
>> understand the frustration caused by such delays but I think that
>> SOLR-13285 is something that really breaks Solr in a major version release.
>> We can always have a 8.0.1 release that fixes it but I feel like it would
>> not be a good thing to offer an 8.0.0 version to end-users knowing that it
>> would cause issues for anyone using enum fields.
>> >
>> > I am sorry that it would require more time and effort at the end of the
>> RM but In my opinion, this is worth a respin.
>> >
>> > Anshum
>> >
>> > On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 10:52 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
>> ichattopadhyaya@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> In case we go through with this RC, I can volunteer to release a 8.0.1
>> (with SOLR-13285) immediately after 8.0.0 release.
>> >> @Adrien, Jim, I really understand the frustrations of an RM, and I
>> also apologize for the delay I caused to this release due to the
>> intermediate 7.7.1 release where I didn't do it as quickly as I could have
>> (delay in building the RC, delay in backporting the backward compatibility
>> indexes etc).
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 10:52 AM Tomás Fernández Löbbe <
>> tomasflobbe@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> I understand the frustration with the delay and the number of
>> respins, and I don't want to be disrespectful of Jim's time as RC, but from
>> what I can see, SOLR-13285 would prevent anyone with enum fields to use
>> Solr 8.0, and the fix is already available.
>> >>>
>> >>> -0
>> >>>
>> >>> On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 2:14 PM Nhat Nguyen <nh...@elastic.co.invalid>
>> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> +1 SUCCESS! [0:54:05.261238]
>> >>>>
>> >>>> > On Mar 7, 2019, at 4:44 PM, Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > +1 SUCCESS! [1:25:54.239684]
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 5:53 PM jim ferenczi <ji...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >> Please vote for release candidate 3 for Lucene/Solr 8.0.0
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >> The artifacts can be downloaded from
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.0.0-RC3-reva9d80bf18af04850ea21dcf88a40367559fb246e
>> >>>> >> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>> >>>> >> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.0.0-RC3-reva9d80bf18af04850ea21dcf88a40367559fb246e
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >> Here’s my +1
>> >>>> >> SUCCESS! [1:14:08.843490]
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > --
>> >>>> > Adrien
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> >
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> >>>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>> >>>> >
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>> >>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Adrien
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.0.0 RC3
Posted by jim ferenczi <ji...@gmail.com>.
I agree, let's respin today and initiate a new vote. Do we have a volunteer
for the backport or should I do it ?
Le ven. 8 mars 2019 à 09:03, Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> Since there is already a fix as Tomás mentioned, can someone backport
> it to branch_8_0 so that we can try to get a new RC out today?
>
> @Ishan Chattopadhyaya No worry at all, thanks for taking care of
> getting 7.7.1 out.
>
> On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 8:24 AM Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>
> wrote:
> >
> > Having done these releases more than a few times, I completely
> understand the frustration caused by such delays but I think that
> SOLR-13285 is something that really breaks Solr in a major version release.
> We can always have a 8.0.1 release that fixes it but I feel like it would
> not be a good thing to offer an 8.0.0 version to end-users knowing that it
> would cause issues for anyone using enum fields.
> >
> > I am sorry that it would require more time and effort at the end of the
> RM but In my opinion, this is worth a respin.
> >
> > Anshum
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 10:52 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
> ichattopadhyaya@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> In case we go through with this RC, I can volunteer to release a 8.0.1
> (with SOLR-13285) immediately after 8.0.0 release.
> >> @Adrien, Jim, I really understand the frustrations of an RM, and I also
> apologize for the delay I caused to this release due to the intermediate
> 7.7.1 release where I didn't do it as quickly as I could have (delay in
> building the RC, delay in backporting the backward compatibility indexes
> etc).
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 10:52 AM Tomás Fernández Löbbe <
> tomasflobbe@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I understand the frustration with the delay and the number of respins,
> and I don't want to be disrespectful of Jim's time as RC, but from what I
> can see, SOLR-13285 would prevent anyone with enum fields to use Solr 8.0,
> and the fix is already available.
> >>>
> >>> -0
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 2:14 PM Nhat Nguyen <nh...@elastic.co.invalid>
> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> +1 SUCCESS! [0:54:05.261238]
> >>>>
> >>>> > On Mar 7, 2019, at 4:44 PM, Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> >
> >>>> > +1 SUCCESS! [1:25:54.239684]
> >>>> >
> >>>> > On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 5:53 PM jim ferenczi <ji...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> Please vote for release candidate 3 for Lucene/Solr 8.0.0
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> The artifacts can be downloaded from
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.0.0-RC3-reva9d80bf18af04850ea21dcf88a40367559fb246e
> >>>> >> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
> >>>> >> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.0.0-RC3-reva9d80bf18af04850ea21dcf88a40367559fb246e
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> Here’s my +1
> >>>> >> SUCCESS! [1:14:08.843490]
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> > --
> >>>> > Adrien
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> >>>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> >>>> >
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> >>>>
>
>
> --
> Adrien
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.0.0 RC3
Posted by Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com>.
Since there is already a fix as Tomás mentioned, can someone backport
it to branch_8_0 so that we can try to get a new RC out today?
@Ishan Chattopadhyaya No worry at all, thanks for taking care of
getting 7.7.1 out.
On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 8:24 AM Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net> wrote:
>
> Having done these releases more than a few times, I completely understand the frustration caused by such delays but I think that SOLR-13285 is something that really breaks Solr in a major version release. We can always have a 8.0.1 release that fixes it but I feel like it would not be a good thing to offer an 8.0.0 version to end-users knowing that it would cause issues for anyone using enum fields.
>
> I am sorry that it would require more time and effort at the end of the RM but In my opinion, this is worth a respin.
>
> Anshum
>
> On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 10:52 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <ic...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> In case we go through with this RC, I can volunteer to release a 8.0.1 (with SOLR-13285) immediately after 8.0.0 release.
>> @Adrien, Jim, I really understand the frustrations of an RM, and I also apologize for the delay I caused to this release due to the intermediate 7.7.1 release where I didn't do it as quickly as I could have (delay in building the RC, delay in backporting the backward compatibility indexes etc).
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 10:52 AM Tomás Fernández Löbbe <to...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I understand the frustration with the delay and the number of respins, and I don't want to be disrespectful of Jim's time as RC, but from what I can see, SOLR-13285 would prevent anyone with enum fields to use Solr 8.0, and the fix is already available.
>>>
>>> -0
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 2:14 PM Nhat Nguyen <nh...@elastic.co.invalid> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> +1 SUCCESS! [0:54:05.261238]
>>>>
>>>> > On Mar 7, 2019, at 4:44 PM, Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > +1 SUCCESS! [1:25:54.239684]
>>>> >
>>>> > On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 5:53 PM jim ferenczi <ji...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Please vote for release candidate 3 for Lucene/Solr 8.0.0
>>>> >>
>>>> >> The artifacts can be downloaded from https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.0.0-RC3-reva9d80bf18af04850ea21dcf88a40367559fb246e
>>>> >> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>>>> >> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.0.0-RC3-reva9d80bf18af04850ea21dcf88a40367559fb246e
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Here’s my +1
>>>> >> SUCCESS! [1:14:08.843490]
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > --
>>>> > Adrien
>>>> >
>>>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>>
--
Adrien
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.0.0 RC3
Posted by Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>.
Having done these releases more than a few times, I completely understand
the frustration caused by such delays but I think that SOLR-13285 is
something that really breaks Solr in a major version release. We can always
have a 8.0.1 release that fixes it but I feel like it would not be a good
thing to offer an 8.0.0 version to end-users knowing that it would cause
issues for anyone using enum fields.
I am sorry that it would require more time and effort at the end of the RM
but In my opinion, this is worth a respin.
Anshum
On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 10:52 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
ichattopadhyaya@gmail.com> wrote:
> In case we go through with this RC, I can volunteer to release a 8.0.1
> (with SOLR-13285) immediately after 8.0.0 release.
> @Adrien, Jim, I really understand the frustrations of an RM, and I also
> apologize for the delay I caused to this release due to the intermediate
> 7.7.1 release where I didn't do it as quickly as I could have (delay in
> building the RC, delay in backporting the backward compatibility indexes
> etc).
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 10:52 AM Tomás Fernández Löbbe <
> tomasflobbe@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I understand the frustration with the delay and the number of respins,
>> and I don't want to be disrespectful of Jim's time as RC, but from what I
>> can see, SOLR-13285 would prevent anyone with enum fields to use Solr 8.0,
>> and the fix is already available.
>>
>> -0
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 2:14 PM Nhat Nguyen <nh...@elastic.co.invalid>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 SUCCESS! [0:54:05.261238]
>>>
>>> > On Mar 7, 2019, at 4:44 PM, Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > +1 SUCCESS! [1:25:54.239684]
>>> >
>>> > On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 5:53 PM jim ferenczi <ji...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> Please vote for release candidate 3 for Lucene/Solr 8.0.0
>>> >>
>>> >> The artifacts can be downloaded from
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.0.0-RC3-reva9d80bf18af04850ea21dcf88a40367559fb246e
>>> >> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>>> >> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.0.0-RC3-reva9d80bf18af04850ea21dcf88a40367559fb246e
>>> >>
>>> >> Here’s my +1
>>> >> SUCCESS! [1:14:08.843490]
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Adrien
>>> >
>>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>
>>>
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.0.0 RC3
Posted by Ishan Chattopadhyaya <ic...@gmail.com>.
In case we go through with this RC, I can volunteer to release a 8.0.1
(with SOLR-13285) immediately after 8.0.0 release.
@Adrien, Jim, I really understand the frustrations of an RM, and I also
apologize for the delay I caused to this release due to the intermediate
7.7.1 release where I didn't do it as quickly as I could have (delay in
building the RC, delay in backporting the backward compatibility indexes
etc).
On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 10:52 AM Tomás Fernández Löbbe <to...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> I understand the frustration with the delay and the number of respins, and
> I don't want to be disrespectful of Jim's time as RC, but from what I can
> see, SOLR-13285 would prevent anyone with enum fields to use Solr 8.0, and
> the fix is already available.
>
> -0
>
> On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 2:14 PM Nhat Nguyen <nh...@elastic.co.invalid>
> wrote:
>
>> +1 SUCCESS! [0:54:05.261238]
>>
>> > On Mar 7, 2019, at 4:44 PM, Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > +1 SUCCESS! [1:25:54.239684]
>> >
>> > On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 5:53 PM jim ferenczi <ji...@apache.org> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Please vote for release candidate 3 for Lucene/Solr 8.0.0
>> >>
>> >> The artifacts can be downloaded from
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.0.0-RC3-reva9d80bf18af04850ea21dcf88a40367559fb246e
>> >> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>> >> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.0.0-RC3-reva9d80bf18af04850ea21dcf88a40367559fb246e
>> >>
>> >> Here’s my +1
>> >> SUCCESS! [1:14:08.843490]
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Adrien
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>> >
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.0.0 RC3
Posted by Tomás Fernández Löbbe <to...@gmail.com>.
I understand the frustration with the delay and the number of respins, and
I don't want to be disrespectful of Jim's time as RC, but from what I can
see, SOLR-13285 would prevent anyone with enum fields to use Solr 8.0, and
the fix is already available.
-0
On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 2:14 PM Nhat Nguyen <nh...@elastic.co.invalid>
wrote:
> +1 SUCCESS! [0:54:05.261238]
>
> > On Mar 7, 2019, at 4:44 PM, Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > +1 SUCCESS! [1:25:54.239684]
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 5:53 PM jim ferenczi <ji...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> Please vote for release candidate 3 for Lucene/Solr 8.0.0
> >>
> >> The artifacts can be downloaded from
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.0.0-RC3-reva9d80bf18af04850ea21dcf88a40367559fb246e
> >> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
> >> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.0.0-RC3-reva9d80bf18af04850ea21dcf88a40367559fb246e
> >>
> >> Here’s my +1
> >> SUCCESS! [1:14:08.843490]
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Adrien
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.0.0 RC3
Posted by Nhat Nguyen <nh...@elastic.co.INVALID>.
+1 SUCCESS! [0:54:05.261238]
> On Mar 7, 2019, at 4:44 PM, Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1 SUCCESS! [1:25:54.239684]
>
> On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 5:53 PM jim ferenczi <ji...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> Please vote for release candidate 3 for Lucene/Solr 8.0.0
>>
>> The artifacts can be downloaded from https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.0.0-RC3-reva9d80bf18af04850ea21dcf88a40367559fb246e
>> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.0.0-RC3-reva9d80bf18af04850ea21dcf88a40367559fb246e
>>
>> Here’s my +1
>> SUCCESS! [1:14:08.843490]
>
>
>
> --
> Adrien
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.0.0 RC3
Posted by Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com>.
+1 SUCCESS! [1:25:54.239684]
On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 5:53 PM jim ferenczi <ji...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Please vote for release candidate 3 for Lucene/Solr 8.0.0
>
> The artifacts can be downloaded from https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.0.0-RC3-reva9d80bf18af04850ea21dcf88a40367559fb246e
> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.0.0-RC3-reva9d80bf18af04850ea21dcf88a40367559fb246e
>
> Here’s my +1
> SUCCESS! [1:14:08.843490]
--
Adrien
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
RE: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.0.0 RC3
Posted by Uwe Schindler <uw...@thetaphi.de>.
Hi,
I did the same tests like last time. Here the results:
https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-Release-Tester/17/console
SUCCESS! [2:37:21.770467]
The testing was done with Java 8 and Java 9 (this is why it took longer).
I also checked Changes.txt, looks fine!
I also checked the ZIP files of Lucene and Solr. Lucene looks as usual, MIGRATE.txt is also fine – thanks for adding recent information! JAR files also look fine, compiled with correct version of Java and patches multi-release class files are there.
Apache Solr was unzipped and quickly tested on Windows: Startup with Java 8 and Java 11 worked without any problems from a directory with whitespace in path. I was able to do a HTTP/2 request with CURL (non-TLS) on both O/S (as ALPN is not available without TLS, the curl client needed to upgrade the request, so you see “101 Switching Protocols”):
Uwe Schindler@VEGA:~ > curl -I --http2 localhost:8983/solr/
HTTP/1.1 101 Switching Protocols
HTTP/2 200
x-frame-options: DENY
content-type: text/html;charset=utf-8
content-length: 14662
So, it worked. In the webbrowser it did not use HTTP/2, as browsers require SSL and ALPN for that (by default).
Next I enabled TLS support by creating a keystore. This time it was possible to start Solr on Java 8 and Java 11 – bug fixed. With Solr running in Java 8, CURL was only able to do a HTTP/1.1 request because ALPN told this to the curl client:
Uwe Schindler@VEGA:~ > curl -k -I --http2 https://localhost:8983/solr/
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
X-Frame-Options: DENY
Content-Type: text/html;charset=utf-8
Content-Length: 14662
With Java 11, my curl test worked with HTTP/2, this time no protocol switch needed as ALPN is active:
Uwe Schindler@VEGA:~ > curl -k -I --http2 https://localhost:8983/solr/
HTTP/2 200
x-frame-options: DENY
content-type: text/html;charset=utf-8
content-length: 14662
I also checked in Chrome browser, this time it uses HTTP/2 to communicate with the admin interface. Fine!
+1 to release Lucene/Solr 8.0.0 (RC3).
Uwe
-----
Uwe Schindler
Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de <http://www.thetaphi.de/>
eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de
From: jim ferenczi <ji...@apache.org>
Sent: Thursday, March 7, 2019 5:53 PM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.0.0 RC3
Please vote for release candidate 3 for Lucene/Solr 8.0.0
The artifacts can be downloaded from <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.0.0-RC3-reva9d80bf18af04850ea21dcf88a40367559fb246e> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.0.0-RC3-reva9d80bf18af04850ea21dcf88a40367559fb246e
You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.0.0-RC3-reva9d80bf18af04850ea21dcf88a40367559fb246e> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.0.0-RC3-reva9d80bf18af04850ea21dcf88a40367559fb246e
Here’s my +1
SUCCESS! [1:14:08.843490]