You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to pluto-dev@portals.apache.org by Eric Dalquist <er...@doit.wisc.edu> on 2008/05/02 18:10:25 UTC
portlet API docs
There are a lot of links on the web that point to
http://portals.apache.org/pluto/multiproject/portlet-api/apidocs/ for
the javax.portlet API documentation. These docs recently disappeared,
any chance they could be put back up at that location?
-Eric
Re: portlet API docs
Posted by Eric Dalquist <er...@doit.wisc.edu>.
Thanks!
Elliot Metsger wrote:
> I probably removed them when I reorged the site a while back for the
> 1.1.5 release. Cruft builds up over time: when you do a mvn
> site-deploy it doesn't delete content, it just overwrites it; I rm
> -rfed the site to get rid of the cruft.
>
> Anyway, it should be fixed now; the public mirror needs to sync up.
> There's a 'portlet-1.0-apidocs' directory with a copy of the javadoc,
> and I created an htaccess file to redirect the googleable url.
>
> E
>
> Eric Dalquist wrote:
>> There are a lot of links on the web that point to
>> http://portals.apache.org/pluto/multiproject/portlet-api/apidocs/ for
>> the javax.portlet API documentation. These docs recently disappeared,
>> any chance they could be put back up at that location?
>>
>> -Eric
Re: portlet API docs
Posted by Elliot Metsger <em...@jhu.edu>.
I probably removed them when I reorged the site a while back for the
1.1.5 release. Cruft builds up over time: when you do a mvn site-deploy
it doesn't delete content, it just overwrites it; I rm -rfed the site to
get rid of the cruft.
Anyway, it should be fixed now; the public mirror needs to sync up.
There's a 'portlet-1.0-apidocs' directory with a copy of the javadoc,
and I created an htaccess file to redirect the googleable url.
E
Eric Dalquist wrote:
> There are a lot of links on the web that point to
> http://portals.apache.org/pluto/multiproject/portlet-api/apidocs/ for
> the javax.portlet API documentation. These docs recently disappeared,
> any chance they could be put back up at that location?
>
> -Eric