You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@nifi.apache.org by Robert Fellows <ro...@gmail.com> on 2019/11/01 01:45:48 UTC
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.10.0 (rc3)
+1 (non-binding)
[X] Verified the checksums
[X] Verified signature
[X] Verify build (java 11)
[X] Verify general functionality (including parameter contexts and
back-pressure prediction UI)
On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 10:00 AM Peter Turcsanyi <tu...@apache.org>
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Verified checksums and signatures.
> Built source with empty Maven repo (tests ok, contrib-check ok).
> Tested some flows (all AWS processors, focusing on the new S3 features:
> encryption, storage classes, requester pays).
>
> Peter
>
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 2:28 PM Bryan Bende <bb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Everything in release helper checked out. I did run into a test
> > failure the first time building the source, but then trying again
> > succeeded. I think it is a sporadic failure we have seen before...
> >
> > [ERROR] Tests run: 8, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time
> > elapsed: 1.415 s <<< FAILURE! - in
> > org.apache.nifi.wali.TestLengthDelimitedJournal
> > [ERROR]
> >
> testFailureDuringWriteCannotCauseCorruption(org.apache.nifi.wali.TestLengthDelimitedJournal)
> > Time elapsed: 1.022 s <<< FAILURE!
> > java.lang.AssertionError: expected:<0> but was:<2>
> > at
> >
> org.apache.nifi.wali.TestLengthDelimitedJournal.testFailureDuringWriteCannotCauseCorruption(TestLengthDelimitedJournal.java:585)
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 6:42 AM Kotaro Terada <ko...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Thanks for taking care of it, Pierre and Joe!
> > >
> > > > Please note only PMC votes are binding.
> > >
> > > I got it, I'll be careful next time.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Kotaro
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 7:32 PM Joe Witt <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Id just flag this on release notes and we can fix for the next
> release.
> > > >
> > > > Kotaro good find. Please note only PMC votes are binding.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 6:27 AM Pierre Villard <
> > > > pierre.villard.fr@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Good catch Kotaro! I merged the fix for #2. The fix for #1 LGTM but
> > I'll
> > > > > let the guys who worked on the Java 11 bits look into it.
> > > > >
> > > > > Joe, I didn't set the fix version on the JIRA and will wait until
> we
> > > > reach
> > > > > a decision regarding this RC.
> > > > >
> > > > > Le jeu. 31 oct. 2019 à 11:08, Kotaro Terada <ko...@apache.org> a
> > > > écrit :
> > > > >
> > > > > > -1 (binding), due to the following problems I found.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > (1) NiFi doesn't start up from the rpm build on Java 11.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > We have a mismatch in the "lib" directories of rpm and non-rpm
> > build.
> > > > > This
> > > > > > causes that NiFi (with Java 11) doesn't start up from the rpm
> > build.
> > > > Some
> > > > > > jar files should be located in the "lib/bootstrap/" but they are
> > > > > currently
> > > > > > in "lib/".
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I checked the following behaviors:
> > > > > > - Non-RPM (usual) build with Java 8 and run on Java 8... OK
> > > > > > - Non-RPM (usual) build with Java 11 and run on Java 11... OK
> > > > > > - RPM build with Java 8 and run on Java 8... OK (isn't affected
> by
> > the
> > > > > lib
> > > > > > mismatch)
> > > > > > - RPM build with Java 11 and run on Java 11... NiFi doesn't start
> > (this
> > > > > > problem)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I created a JIRA and a PR to fix it:
> > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-6827
> > > > > >
> > > > > > (2) There is an unintentional string in "conf/logback.xml".
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The "conf/logback.xml" seems to have an unintentional string
> > > > > > "MockProcessContext". I guess this was slipped into it by the
> > merging
> > > > > > commit of https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/3773
> > unintentionally.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I created a JIRA and a PR to fix it:
> > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-6828
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Could you take a look at them, please?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks for working for the release!
> > > > > > Kotaro
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 6:10 PM Pierre Villard <
> > > > > > pierre.villard.fr@gmail.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > +1 (binding)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Went through the release helper guide and it LGTM. Deployed
> > > > > > > secured/unsecured standalone/cluster instances on Google Cloud
> > with
> > > > > > various
> > > > > > > flows including the new BigQuery processor and everything is
> > looking
> > > > > > good.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks Joe for taking care of the release!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Pierre
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Le jeu. 31 oct. 2019 à 03:12, Shayne Burgess <
> > > > shayne.burgess@gmail.com
> > > > > >
> > > > > > a
> > > > > > > écrit :
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Deployed cluster in Azure and smoke tested a fairly
> complicated
> > > > data
> > > > > > > flow.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Verified the fixes for the Azure EventHub Processor that were
> > > > pulled
> > > > > > into
> > > > > > > > RC3 are working as expected.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Shayne
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 5:59 PM Jeff Zemerick <
> > > > jzemerick@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Built and ran successfully and built custom processor with
> > 1.10.0
> > > > > > > > > dependency and successfully uploaded NAR to NiFi Registry
> > 0.5.0.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 4:06 PM Mark Payne <
> > markap14@hotmail.com
> > > > >
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > +1 (binding)
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Was able to build and verify that all of the Jiras that I
> > > > raised
> > > > > > last
> > > > > > > > > time
> > > > > > > > > > around have been addressed in this RC. Left a cluster of
> 10
> > > > nodes
> > > > > > > > running
> > > > > > > > > > for a day or two, pretty heavily taxed, and ran into no
> > issues.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > > > > > -Mark
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On Oct 30, 2019, at 3:20 PM, Matt Gilman <
> > > > > > matt.c.gilman@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > +1 (binding)
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Verified signatures, hashes, build, etc. Tested both
> > > > standalone
> > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > clustered and secure and unsecured.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for RMing Joe!
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Matt
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 1:51 PM Adam Taft <
> > adam@adamtaft.com
> > > > >
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >> +1 (binding)
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > >> Signatures verified.
> > > > > > > > > > >> Hashes verified.
> > > > > > > > > > >> Tests pass, source builds cleanly.
> > > > > > > > > > >> I used both Java 11 & Java 8 to build.
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > >> I did run into a problem compiling with Java 11 and
> > running
> > > > > with
> > > > > > > > Java
> > > > > > > > > > 8. I
> > > > > > > > > > >> don't believe this was a goal of the Java 11
> > compatibility
> > > > > > > changes,
> > > > > > > > so
> > > > > > > > > > >> nothing unexpected about this. But it's possibly worth
> > > > > > discussion
> > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > >> another thread (which I'll send out). The convenience
> > > > binary
> > > > > > was
> > > > > > > > > > compiled
> > > > > > > > > > >> with Java 8, so no problems with compatibility either
> > way.
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > >> On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 11:32 AM Joe Witt <
> > > > joewitt@apache.org
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > >>> Hello,
> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>> I am pleased to be calling this vote for the source
> > release
> > > > > of
> > > > > > > > Apache
> > > > > > > > > > >> NiFi
> > > > > > > > > > >>> nifi-1.10.0.
> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>> As they say 'third time's a charm'.
> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>> The source zip, including signatures, digests, etc.
> > can be
> > > > > > found
> > > > > > > > at:
> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachenifi-1151
> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>> The source being voted upon and the convenience
> > binaries
> > > > can
> > > > > be
> > > > > > > > found
> > > > > > > > > > at:
> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/nifi/nifi-1.10.0/
> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>> The Git tag is nifi-1.10.0-RC3
> > > > > > > > > > >>> The Git commit ID is
> > > > b217ae20ad6a04cac874b2b00d93b7f7514c0b88
> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> >
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=nifi.git;a=commit;h=b217ae20ad6a04cac874b2b00d93b7f7514c0b88
> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>> Checksums of nifi-1.10.0-source-release.zip:
> > > > > > > > > > >>> SHA256:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > e9b0a14b3029acd69c6693781b6b6487c14dda12676db8b4a015bce23b1029c1
> > > > > > > > > > >>> SHA512:
> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> >
> b07258cbc21d2e529a1aa3098449917e2d059e6b45ffcfcb6df094931cf16caa8970576555164d3f2290cfe064b5780ba1a8bf63dad04d20100ed559a1cfe133
> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> > > > > > > > > > >>> https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/joewitt.asc
> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>> KEYS file available here:
> > > > > > > > > > >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/nifi/KEYS
> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>> 384 issues were closed/resolved for this release:
> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12316020&version=12344993
> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>> Release note highlights can be found here:
> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NIFI/Release+Notes#ReleaseNotes-Version1.10.0
> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>> The vote will be open for 72 hours.
> > > > > > > > > > >>> Please download the release candidate and evaluate
> the
> > > > > > necessary
> > > > > > > > > items
> > > > > > > > > > >>> including checking hashes, signatures, build
> > > > > > > > > > >>> from source, and test. Then please vote:
> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>> [ ] +1 Release this package as nifi-1.10.0
> > > > > > > > > > >>> [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > > > > > > > >>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> >
>
--
-------------------------------
Rob Fellows
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.10.0 (rc3)
Posted by Marc Parisi <ph...@apache.org>.
+1
Verified sigs/hashes, built and ran example flows on my server
machine(s) running the same flow across different operating systems. Used
Apache NIFi MiNiFi as an ingress to NiFi for common test flow that I use.
Awesome work getting this out!
On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 9:56 PM Robert Fellows <ro...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> [X] Verified the checksums
> [X] Verified signature
> [X] Verify build (java 11)
> [X] Verify general functionality (including parameter contexts and
> back-pressure prediction UI)
>
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 10:00 AM Peter Turcsanyi <tu...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Verified checksums and signatures.
> > Built source with empty Maven repo (tests ok, contrib-check ok).
> > Tested some flows (all AWS processors, focusing on the new S3 features:
> > encryption, storage classes, requester pays).
> >
> > Peter
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 2:28 PM Bryan Bende <bb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > > Everything in release helper checked out. I did run into a test
> > > failure the first time building the source, but then trying again
> > > succeeded. I think it is a sporadic failure we have seen before...
> > >
> > > [ERROR] Tests run: 8, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time
> > > elapsed: 1.415 s <<< FAILURE! - in
> > > org.apache.nifi.wali.TestLengthDelimitedJournal
> > > [ERROR]
> > >
> >
> testFailureDuringWriteCannotCauseCorruption(org.apache.nifi.wali.TestLengthDelimitedJournal)
> > > Time elapsed: 1.022 s <<< FAILURE!
> > > java.lang.AssertionError: expected:<0> but was:<2>
> > > at
> > >
> >
> org.apache.nifi.wali.TestLengthDelimitedJournal.testFailureDuringWriteCannotCauseCorruption(TestLengthDelimitedJournal.java:585)
> > >
> > > On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 6:42 AM Kotaro Terada <ko...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for taking care of it, Pierre and Joe!
> > > >
> > > > > Please note only PMC votes are binding.
> > > >
> > > > I got it, I'll be careful next time.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Kotaro
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 7:32 PM Joe Witt <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Id just flag this on release notes and we can fix for the next
> > release.
> > > > >
> > > > > Kotaro good find. Please note only PMC votes are binding.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 6:27 AM Pierre Villard <
> > > > > pierre.villard.fr@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Good catch Kotaro! I merged the fix for #2. The fix for #1 LGTM
> but
> > > I'll
> > > > > > let the guys who worked on the Java 11 bits look into it.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Joe, I didn't set the fix version on the JIRA and will wait until
> > we
> > > > > reach
> > > > > > a decision regarding this RC.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Le jeu. 31 oct. 2019 à 11:08, Kotaro Terada <ko...@apache.org>
> a
> > > > > écrit :
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > -1 (binding), due to the following problems I found.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > (1) NiFi doesn't start up from the rpm build on Java 11.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > We have a mismatch in the "lib" directories of rpm and non-rpm
> > > build.
> > > > > > This
> > > > > > > causes that NiFi (with Java 11) doesn't start up from the rpm
> > > build.
> > > > > Some
> > > > > > > jar files should be located in the "lib/bootstrap/" but they
> are
> > > > > > currently
> > > > > > > in "lib/".
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I checked the following behaviors:
> > > > > > > - Non-RPM (usual) build with Java 8 and run on Java 8... OK
> > > > > > > - Non-RPM (usual) build with Java 11 and run on Java 11... OK
> > > > > > > - RPM build with Java 8 and run on Java 8... OK (isn't affected
> > by
> > > the
> > > > > > lib
> > > > > > > mismatch)
> > > > > > > - RPM build with Java 11 and run on Java 11... NiFi doesn't
> start
> > > (this
> > > > > > > problem)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I created a JIRA and a PR to fix it:
> > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-6827
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > (2) There is an unintentional string in "conf/logback.xml".
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The "conf/logback.xml" seems to have an unintentional string
> > > > > > > "MockProcessContext". I guess this was slipped into it by the
> > > merging
> > > > > > > commit of https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/3773
> > > unintentionally.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I created a JIRA and a PR to fix it:
> > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-6828
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Could you take a look at them, please?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks for working for the release!
> > > > > > > Kotaro
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 6:10 PM Pierre Villard <
> > > > > > > pierre.villard.fr@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > +1 (binding)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Went through the release helper guide and it LGTM. Deployed
> > > > > > > > secured/unsecured standalone/cluster instances on Google
> Cloud
> > > with
> > > > > > > various
> > > > > > > > flows including the new BigQuery processor and everything is
> > > looking
> > > > > > > good.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks Joe for taking care of the release!
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Pierre
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Le jeu. 31 oct. 2019 à 03:12, Shayne Burgess <
> > > > > shayne.burgess@gmail.com
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > écrit :
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Deployed cluster in Azure and smoke tested a fairly
> > complicated
> > > > > data
> > > > > > > > flow.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Verified the fixes for the Azure EventHub Processor that
> were
> > > > > pulled
> > > > > > > into
> > > > > > > > > RC3 are working as expected.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Shayne
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 5:59 PM Jeff Zemerick <
> > > > > jzemerick@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Built and ran successfully and built custom processor
> with
> > > 1.10.0
> > > > > > > > > > dependency and successfully uploaded NAR to NiFi Registry
> > > 0.5.0.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 4:06 PM Mark Payne <
> > > markap14@hotmail.com
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > +1 (binding)
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Was able to build and verify that all of the Jiras
> that I
> > > > > raised
> > > > > > > last
> > > > > > > > > > time
> > > > > > > > > > > around have been addressed in this RC. Left a cluster
> of
> > 10
> > > > > nodes
> > > > > > > > > running
> > > > > > > > > > > for a day or two, pretty heavily taxed, and ran into no
> > > issues.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > > > > > > -Mark
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > On Oct 30, 2019, at 3:20 PM, Matt Gilman <
> > > > > > > matt.c.gilman@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > +1 (binding)
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Verified signatures, hashes, build, etc. Tested both
> > > > > standalone
> > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > > clustered and secure and unsecured.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for RMing Joe!
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Matt
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 1:51 PM Adam Taft <
> > > adam@adamtaft.com
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> +1 (binding)
> > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > >> Signatures verified.
> > > > > > > > > > > >> Hashes verified.
> > > > > > > > > > > >> Tests pass, source builds cleanly.
> > > > > > > > > > > >> I used both Java 11 & Java 8 to build.
> > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > >> I did run into a problem compiling with Java 11 and
> > > running
> > > > > > with
> > > > > > > > > Java
> > > > > > > > > > > 8. I
> > > > > > > > > > > >> don't believe this was a goal of the Java 11
> > > compatibility
> > > > > > > > changes,
> > > > > > > > > so
> > > > > > > > > > > >> nothing unexpected about this. But it's possibly
> worth
> > > > > > > discussion
> > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > > >> another thread (which I'll send out). The
> convenience
> > > > > binary
> > > > > > > was
> > > > > > > > > > > compiled
> > > > > > > > > > > >> with Java 8, so no problems with compatibility
> either
> > > way.
> > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > >> On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 11:32 AM Joe Witt <
> > > > > joewitt@apache.org
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > >>> Hello,
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > > >>> I am pleased to be calling this vote for the source
> > > release
> > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > Apache
> > > > > > > > > > > >> NiFi
> > > > > > > > > > > >>> nifi-1.10.0.
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > > >>> As they say 'third time's a charm'.
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > > >>> The source zip, including signatures, digests, etc.
> > > can be
> > > > > > > found
> > > > > > > > > at:
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachenifi-1151
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > > >>> The source being voted upon and the convenience
> > > binaries
> > > > > can
> > > > > > be
> > > > > > > > > found
> > > > > > > > > > > at:
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/nifi/nifi-1.10.0/
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > > >>> The Git tag is nifi-1.10.0-RC3
> > > > > > > > > > > >>> The Git commit ID is
> > > > > b217ae20ad6a04cac874b2b00d93b7f7514c0b88
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> >
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=nifi.git;a=commit;h=b217ae20ad6a04cac874b2b00d93b7f7514c0b88
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > > >>> Checksums of nifi-1.10.0-source-release.zip:
> > > > > > > > > > > >>> SHA256:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > e9b0a14b3029acd69c6693781b6b6487c14dda12676db8b4a015bce23b1029c1
> > > > > > > > > > > >>> SHA512:
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> >
> b07258cbc21d2e529a1aa3098449917e2d059e6b45ffcfcb6df094931cf16caa8970576555164d3f2290cfe064b5780ba1a8bf63dad04d20100ed559a1cfe133
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > > >>> Release artifacts are signed with the following
> key:
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>
> https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/joewitt.asc
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > > >>> KEYS file available here:
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/nifi/KEYS
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > > >>> 384 issues were closed/resolved for this release:
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12316020&version=12344993
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > > >>> Release note highlights can be found here:
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NIFI/Release+Notes#ReleaseNotes-Version1.10.0
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > > >>> The vote will be open for 72 hours.
> > > > > > > > > > > >>> Please download the release candidate and evaluate
> > the
> > > > > > > necessary
> > > > > > > > > > items
> > > > > > > > > > > >>> including checking hashes, signatures, build
> > > > > > > > > > > >>> from source, and test. Then please vote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > > >>> [ ] +1 Release this package as nifi-1.10.0
> > > > > > > > > > > >>> [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > > > > > > > > >>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> -------------------------------
> Rob Fellows
>