You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@qpid.apache.org by "Rafael H. Schloming (JIRA)" <qp...@incubator.apache.org> on 2007/09/12 13:39:32 UTC
[jira] Commented: (QPID-598) Intermittent TransactedTest Failure
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12526748 ]
Rafael H. Schloming commented on QPID-598:
------------------------------------------
Is the QPID-573 fix now on the M2.1 branch?
> Intermittent TransactedTest Failure
> ------------------------------------
>
> Key: QPID-598
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-598
> Project: Qpid
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Java Tests
> Affects Versions: M2.1
> Reporter: Martin Ritchie
>
> Tests run: 3, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 3.671 sec <<< FAILURE!
> testRollback(org.apache.qpid.test.unit.transacted.TransactedTest) Time elapsed: 0.562 sec <<< FAILURE!
> junit.framework.ComparisonFailure: Message content does not match expected expected:<A> but was:<C>
> at junit.framework.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:81)
> at org.apache.qpid.test.unit.transacted.TransactedTest.expect(TransactedTest.java:306)
> at org.apache.qpid.test.unit.transacted.TransactedTest.testRollback(TransactedTest.java:199)
> As this is related to Rollback and was seen with the fix for the CSDM ordering issue in place I would say the culprit here is the rollback mechanism. Did QPID-573 fully address rollback issues?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
Re: [jira] Commented: (QPID-598) Intermittent TransactedTest Failure
Posted by Rafael Schloming <ra...@redhat.com>.
Robert Greig wrote:
> On 12/09/2007, Rafael Schloming <ra...@redhat.com> wrote:
>> I have not merged it anywhere yet. I'm happy to do so, but I probably
>> won't get around to it until tomorrow or friday.
>
> OK. Can you also merge it into the M2 branch, since this fix is one of
> the three required to be fixed before we can release M2.
Will do.
--Rafael
Re: [jira] Commented: (QPID-598) Intermittent TransactedTest Failure
Posted by Robert Greig <ro...@gmail.com>.
On 12/09/2007, Rafael Schloming <ra...@redhat.com> wrote:
> I have not merged it anywhere yet. I'm happy to do so, but I probably
> won't get around to it until tomorrow or friday.
OK. Can you also merge it into the M2 branch, since this fix is one of
the three required to be fixed before we can release M2.
RG
Re: [jira] Commented: (QPID-598) Intermittent TransactedTest Failure
Posted by Rafael Schloming <ra...@redhat.com>.
I have not merged it anywhere yet. I'm happy to do so, but I probably
won't get around to it until tomorrow or friday.
--Rafael
Martin Ritchie wrote:
> Did you not merge it to M2.1? I can't tell from the JIRA notes as the
> commit log didn't have QPID-573 in the message
>
> On 12/09/2007, Rafael H. Schloming (JIRA) <qp...@incubator.apache.org> wrote:
>> [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12526748 ]
>>
>> Rafael H. Schloming commented on QPID-598:
>> ------------------------------------------
>>
>> Is the QPID-573 fix now on the M2.1 branch?
>>
>>> Intermittent TransactedTest Failure
>>> ------------------------------------
>>>
>>> Key: QPID-598
>>> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-598
>>> Project: Qpid
>>> Issue Type: Bug
>>> Components: Java Tests
>>> Affects Versions: M2.1
>>> Reporter: Martin Ritchie
>>>
>>> Tests run: 3, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 3.671 sec <<< FAILURE!
>>> testRollback(org.apache.qpid.test.unit.transacted.TransactedTest) Time elapsed: 0.562 sec <<< FAILURE!
>>> junit.framework.ComparisonFailure: Message content does not match expected expected:<A> but was:<C>
>>> at junit.framework.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:81)
>>> at org.apache.qpid.test.unit.transacted.TransactedTest.expect(TransactedTest.java:306)
>>> at org.apache.qpid.test.unit.transacted.TransactedTest.testRollback(TransactedTest.java:199)
>>> As this is related to Rollback and was seen with the fix for the CSDM ordering issue in place I would say the culprit here is the rollback mechanism. Did QPID-573 fully address rollback issues?
>> --
>> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
>> -
>> You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
>>
>>
>
>
Re: [jira] Commented: (QPID-598) Intermittent TransactedTest Failure
Posted by Martin Ritchie <ri...@apache.org>.
Did you not merge it to M2.1? I can't tell from the JIRA notes as the
commit log didn't have QPID-573 in the message
On 12/09/2007, Rafael H. Schloming (JIRA) <qp...@incubator.apache.org> wrote:
>
> [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12526748 ]
>
> Rafael H. Schloming commented on QPID-598:
> ------------------------------------------
>
> Is the QPID-573 fix now on the M2.1 branch?
>
> > Intermittent TransactedTest Failure
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > Key: QPID-598
> > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-598
> > Project: Qpid
> > Issue Type: Bug
> > Components: Java Tests
> > Affects Versions: M2.1
> > Reporter: Martin Ritchie
> >
> > Tests run: 3, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 3.671 sec <<< FAILURE!
> > testRollback(org.apache.qpid.test.unit.transacted.TransactedTest) Time elapsed: 0.562 sec <<< FAILURE!
> > junit.framework.ComparisonFailure: Message content does not match expected expected:<A> but was:<C>
> > at junit.framework.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:81)
> > at org.apache.qpid.test.unit.transacted.TransactedTest.expect(TransactedTest.java:306)
> > at org.apache.qpid.test.unit.transacted.TransactedTest.testRollback(TransactedTest.java:199)
> > As this is related to Rollback and was seen with the fix for the CSDM ordering issue in place I would say the culprit here is the rollback mechanism. Did QPID-573 fully address rollback issues?
>
> --
> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
> -
> You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
>
>
--
Martin Ritchie