excess parsers

[Jeanne Waldman <je...@oracle.com>]

Hi there,

I see there are a lot of parsers that I'm 99.9% sure we no longer use. 
We used to use them before Trinidad was Trinidad and was UIX.

They are all the parsers in the 
org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.ui.laf.xml.parse package.

Is there a reason that these are still around? I don't need it for skinning.

I can create an issue to delete these files and their references if 
everyone is ok with it.

- Jeanne

Re: excess parsers

[Jeanne Waldman <je...@oracle.com>]

Except for SkinExtensionParser, that's still used, although it will 
change some after I do my work.

I'll create an issue for the other ones.

- Jeanne

Adam Winer wrote:

> Yep, I don't think those are used anymore.
>
> -- Adam
>
>
> On 11/6/06, Jeanne Waldman <je...@oracle.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi there,
>>
>> I see there are a lot of parsers that I'm 99.9% sure we no longer use.
>> We used to use them before Trinidad was Trinidad and was UIX.
>>
>> They are all the parsers in the
>> org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.ui.laf.xml.parse package.
>>
>> Is there a reason that these are still around? I don't need it for
>> skinning.
>>
>> I can create an issue to delete these files and their references if
>> everyone is ok with it.
>>
>> - Jeanne
>>
>>
>

Re: excess parsers

[Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com>]

Yep, I don't think those are used anymore.

-- Adam


On 11/6/06, Jeanne Waldman <je...@oracle.com> wrote:
>
> Hi there,
>
> I see there are a lot of parsers that I'm 99.9% sure we no longer use.
> We used to use them before Trinidad was Trinidad and was UIX.
>
> They are all the parsers in the
> org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.ui.laf.xml.parse package.
>
> Is there a reason that these are still around? I don't need it for
> skinning.
>
> I can create an issue to delete these files and their references if
> everyone is ok with it.
>
> - Jeanne
>
>