You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cocoon.apache.org by Antonio Gallardo <ag...@agssa.net> on 2005/05/01 10:44:23 UTC
Right word for docs: cachability or cacheability
Hi,
I found a source that contains both words:
cachability and cacheability I wonder wich one is the right. I guess the
second is the right word. Please english native speakers tell me wich is
the right one. In dictionary.com don't contain none of them and googling
returns hits for both. Only that the first word has less hits than the
2nd. If useful, the word context is:
... this might have issues concerning cachability of the generated output ...
Best Regards,
Antonio Gallardo.
Re: Right word for docs: cachability or cacheability
Posted by Ben Pope <be...@gmail.com>.
Antonio Gallardo wrote:
> Thanks for the reply. This is the code in question:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/cocoon/branches/BRANCH_2_1_X/src/java/org/apache/cocoon/transformation/TraxTransformer.java?view=markup
>
> Used to generate this doc:
>
> http://cocoon.apache.org/2.1/apidocs/org/apache/cocoon/transformation/TraxTransformer.html
>
> Can you send me a patch for a correct english of this? ;-)
Hehe, and I thought it was on the docs website here:
http://cocoon.apache.org/2.1/userdocs/transformers/xslt-transformer.html
The change is slightly different to what I would apply to the docs, I'm
sure you can all work it out.
Ben Pope.
Re: Right word for docs: cachability or cacheability
Posted by Antonio Gallardo <ag...@agssa.net>.
Thanks ben.
It is committed. :-)
Best Regards,
Antonio Gallardo.
On Dom, 1 de Mayo de 2005, 4:36, Ben Pope dijo:
> Antonio Gallardo wrote:
>> Can you send me a patch for a correct english of this? ;-)
>
> Apologies...
>
> That last patch was imcomplete.
>
> This covers all instances of cach(e)ability, and replaces a <br> with a
> <p> to increase clarity.
>
> Ben Pope.
>
Re: Right word for docs: cachability or cacheability
Posted by Ben Pope <be...@gmail.com>.
Antonio Gallardo wrote:
> Can you send me a patch for a correct english of this? ;-)
Apologies...
That last patch was imcomplete.
This covers all instances of cach(e)ability, and replaces a <br> with a <p> to increase clarity.
Ben Pope.
Re: Right word for docs: cachability or cacheability
Posted by Antonio Gallardo <ag...@agssa.net>.
Thanks for the reply. This is the code in question:
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/cocoon/branches/BRANCH_2_1_X/src/java/org/apache/cocoon/transformation/TraxTransformer.java?view=markup
Used to generate this doc:
http://cocoon.apache.org/2.1/apidocs/org/apache/cocoon/transformation/TraxTransformer.html
Can you send me a patch for a correct english of this? ;-)
Best Regards,
Antonio Gallardo.
On Dom, 1 de Mayo de 2005, 3:54, Ben Pope dijo:
> Antonio Gallardo wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I found a source that contains both words:
>>
>> cachability and cacheability I wonder wich one is the right. I guess the
>> second is the right word. Please english native speakers tell me wich is
>> the right one. In dictionary.com don't contain none of them and googling
>> returns hits for both. Only that the first word has less hits than the
>> 2nd. If useful, the word context is:
>>
>> ... this might have issues concerning cachability of the generated
>> output ...
>
> Well I don't think it's a word, although it's obvious what it means.
>
> Perhaps:
> "Note that this might prevent the generated output of this transformer
> from being cached as the caching algorithm..."
>
> Although that probably isn't what is meant. It's not the "cachability"
> of the output, it can still be cached, but whether the next request
> matches whats in the cache.
>
> Perhaps:
> "Note that this has implications for the caching of the output of this
> transformer as the caching algorithm..."
>
> WDYT?
>
> Ben Pope.
>
Re: Right word for docs: cachability or cacheability
Posted by Ben Pope <be...@gmail.com>.
Antonio Gallardo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I found a source that contains both words:
>
> cachability and cacheability I wonder wich one is the right. I guess the
> second is the right word. Please english native speakers tell me wich is
> the right one. In dictionary.com don't contain none of them and googling
> returns hits for both. Only that the first word has less hits than the
> 2nd. If useful, the word context is:
>
> ... this might have issues concerning cachability of the generated output ...
Well I don't think it's a word, although it's obvious what it means.
Perhaps:
"Note that this might prevent the generated output of this transformer
from being cached as the caching algorithm..."
Although that probably isn't what is meant. It's not the "cachability"
of the output, it can still be cached, but whether the next request
matches whats in the cache.
Perhaps:
"Note that this has implications for the caching of the output of this
transformer as the caching algorithm..."
WDYT?
Ben Pope.