You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ignite.apache.org by Roman Shtykh <rs...@yahoo.com.INVALID> on 2017/01/10 07:06:44 UTC
Integration with RocketMQ
Igniters,
Recently I am looking into a new pub/sub messaging Apache incubator project called RocketMQ [1], originally developed at Alibaba. And I am thinking about implementing a streamer for Ignite.
Do you think it has to be placed under modules/ of Ignite project, or better to have it together with other RocketMQ Community Projects [2]? I talked to the project's lead -- any approach seems to be ok.
I anticipate quite frequent releases of the project this year (much more frequent than Ignite's), and I think it will be easier to release such integration updates with the 2nd approach, as soon as a new RocketMQ's (or Ignite's) version is available.
Any thoughts?
[1] http://rocketmq.apache.org/[2] https://github.com/rocketmq
Roman
Re: Integration with RocketMQ
Posted by Yakov Zhdanov <yz...@apache.org>.
I would place it under Ignite for consistency with other streamers.
--Yakov
Re: Integration with RocketMQ
Posted by Denis Magda <dm...@apache.org>.
Roman,
Do you have any progress on this? It will be perfect to have the feature in 1.9. Please join the discussion:
http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/Apache-Ignite-1-9-td14170.html <http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/Apache-Ignite-1-9-td14170.html>
—
Denis
> On Jan 11, 2017, at 5:09 PM, Roman Shtykh <rs...@yahoo.com.INVALID> wrote:
>
> Denis,
> Yes, I plan to complete it by that time.
> #Btw, RocketMQ first release (4.0.0) under Apache license is planned for this month. Roman
>
> On Thursday, January 12, 2017 7:30 AM, Denis Magda <dm...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>
> Roman,
>
> Makes perfect sense to me. Do you think we can release this feature in the nearest AI release (1.9 or 2.0) around February/March?
>
> —
> Denis
>
>> On Jan 10, 2017, at 7:57 PM, Roman Shtykh <rs...@yahoo.com.INVALID> wrote:
>>
>> Denis,
>> I think our Kafka integration is the closest to what may be required for RockerMQ. But also I wouldn't exclude expanding to Camel's approach in future, thanks a lot for pointing to it!
>> Let's have it with other streamers as Yakov suggested, and let's discuss again if something fancy is requested ;)
>> I will create a JIRA issue for that and ask RocketMQ developers for reviews and suggestions from their side. Roman
>>
>> On Wednesday, January 11, 2017 12:12 PM, Denis Magda <dm...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Roman,
>>
>> Does it make sense to have corresponding integration modules in both projects?
>>
>> For instance, there is Camel and Ignite integration that is hosted in both projects.
>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/tree/master/modules/camel
>> https://github.com/apache/camel/tree/master/components/camel-ignite <https://github.com/apache/camel/tree/master/components/camel-ignite>
>>
>> I do believe that the modules are not 100% identical and the reason it’s done this way might be because the modules use different Camel or Ignite interfaces and concepts. Is this approach somehow related to RocketMQ and Ignite?
>>
>> —
>> Denis
>>
>>> On Jan 9, 2017, at 11:06 PM, Roman Shtykh <rs...@yahoo.com.INVALID> wrote:
>>>
>>> Igniters,
>>> Recently I am looking into a new pub/sub messaging Apache incubator project called RocketMQ [1], originally developed at Alibaba. And I am thinking about implementing a streamer for Ignite.
>>> Do you think it has to be placed under modules/ of Ignite project, or better to have it together with other RocketMQ Community Projects [2]? I talked to the project's lead -- any approach seems to be ok.
>>> I anticipate quite frequent releases of the project this year (much more frequent than Ignite's), and I think it will be easier to release such integration updates with the 2nd approach, as soon as a new RocketMQ's (or Ignite's) version is available.
>>> Any thoughts?
>>> [1] http://rocketmq.apache.org/[2] https://github.com/rocketmq
>>> Roman
>>
>>
>
>
Re: Integration with RocketMQ
Posted by Roman Shtykh <rs...@yahoo.com.INVALID>.
Denis,
Yes, I plan to complete it by that time.
#Btw, RocketMQ first release (4.0.0) under Apache license is planned for this month. Roman
On Thursday, January 12, 2017 7:30 AM, Denis Magda <dm...@apache.org> wrote:
Roman,
Makes perfect sense to me. Do you think we can release this feature in the nearest AI release (1.9 or 2.0) around February/March?
—
Denis
> On Jan 10, 2017, at 7:57 PM, Roman Shtykh <rs...@yahoo.com.INVALID> wrote:
>
> Denis,
> I think our Kafka integration is the closest to what may be required for RockerMQ. But also I wouldn't exclude expanding to Camel's approach in future, thanks a lot for pointing to it!
> Let's have it with other streamers as Yakov suggested, and let's discuss again if something fancy is requested ;)
> I will create a JIRA issue for that and ask RocketMQ developers for reviews and suggestions from their side. Roman
>
> On Wednesday, January 11, 2017 12:12 PM, Denis Magda <dm...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>
> Roman,
>
> Does it make sense to have corresponding integration modules in both projects?
>
> For instance, there is Camel and Ignite integration that is hosted in both projects.
> https://github.com/apache/ignite/tree/master/modules/camel
> https://github.com/apache/camel/tree/master/components/camel-ignite <https://github.com/apache/camel/tree/master/components/camel-ignite>
>
> I do believe that the modules are not 100% identical and the reason it’s done this way might be because the modules use different Camel or Ignite interfaces and concepts. Is this approach somehow related to RocketMQ and Ignite?
>
> —
> Denis
>
>> On Jan 9, 2017, at 11:06 PM, Roman Shtykh <rs...@yahoo.com.INVALID> wrote:
>>
>> Igniters,
>> Recently I am looking into a new pub/sub messaging Apache incubator project called RocketMQ [1], originally developed at Alibaba. And I am thinking about implementing a streamer for Ignite.
>> Do you think it has to be placed under modules/ of Ignite project, or better to have it together with other RocketMQ Community Projects [2]? I talked to the project's lead -- any approach seems to be ok.
>> I anticipate quite frequent releases of the project this year (much more frequent than Ignite's), and I think it will be easier to release such integration updates with the 2nd approach, as soon as a new RocketMQ's (or Ignite's) version is available.
>> Any thoughts?
>> [1] http://rocketmq.apache.org/[2] https://github.com/rocketmq
>> Roman
>
>
Re: Integration with RocketMQ
Posted by Denis Magda <dm...@apache.org>.
Roman,
Makes perfect sense to me. Do you think we can release this feature in the nearest AI release (1.9 or 2.0) around February/March?
—
Denis
> On Jan 10, 2017, at 7:57 PM, Roman Shtykh <rs...@yahoo.com.INVALID> wrote:
>
> Denis,
> I think our Kafka integration is the closest to what may be required for RockerMQ. But also I wouldn't exclude expanding to Camel's approach in future, thanks a lot for pointing to it!
> Let's have it with other streamers as Yakov suggested, and let's discuss again if something fancy is requested ;)
> I will create a JIRA issue for that and ask RocketMQ developers for reviews and suggestions from their side. Roman
>
> On Wednesday, January 11, 2017 12:12 PM, Denis Magda <dm...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>
> Roman,
>
> Does it make sense to have corresponding integration modules in both projects?
>
> For instance, there is Camel and Ignite integration that is hosted in both projects.
> https://github.com/apache/ignite/tree/master/modules/camel
> https://github.com/apache/camel/tree/master/components/camel-ignite <https://github.com/apache/camel/tree/master/components/camel-ignite>
>
> I do believe that the modules are not 100% identical and the reason it’s done this way might be because the modules use different Camel or Ignite interfaces and concepts. Is this approach somehow related to RocketMQ and Ignite?
>
> —
> Denis
>
>> On Jan 9, 2017, at 11:06 PM, Roman Shtykh <rs...@yahoo.com.INVALID> wrote:
>>
>> Igniters,
>> Recently I am looking into a new pub/sub messaging Apache incubator project called RocketMQ [1], originally developed at Alibaba. And I am thinking about implementing a streamer for Ignite.
>> Do you think it has to be placed under modules/ of Ignite project, or better to have it together with other RocketMQ Community Projects [2]? I talked to the project's lead -- any approach seems to be ok.
>> I anticipate quite frequent releases of the project this year (much more frequent than Ignite's), and I think it will be easier to release such integration updates with the 2nd approach, as soon as a new RocketMQ's (or Ignite's) version is available.
>> Any thoughts?
>> [1] http://rocketmq.apache.org/[2] https://github.com/rocketmq
>> Roman
>
>
Re: Integration with RocketMQ
Posted by Roman Shtykh <rs...@yahoo.com.INVALID>.
Denis,
I think our Kafka integration is the closest to what may be required for RockerMQ. But also I wouldn't exclude expanding to Camel's approach in future, thanks a lot for pointing to it!
Let's have it with other streamers as Yakov suggested, and let's discuss again if something fancy is requested ;)
I will create a JIRA issue for that and ask RocketMQ developers for reviews and suggestions from their side. Roman
On Wednesday, January 11, 2017 12:12 PM, Denis Magda <dm...@apache.org> wrote:
Roman,
Does it make sense to have corresponding integration modules in both projects?
For instance, there is Camel and Ignite integration that is hosted in both projects.
https://github.com/apache/ignite/tree/master/modules/camel
https://github.com/apache/camel/tree/master/components/camel-ignite <https://github.com/apache/camel/tree/master/components/camel-ignite>
I do believe that the modules are not 100% identical and the reason it’s done this way might be because the modules use different Camel or Ignite interfaces and concepts. Is this approach somehow related to RocketMQ and Ignite?
—
Denis
> On Jan 9, 2017, at 11:06 PM, Roman Shtykh <rs...@yahoo.com.INVALID> wrote:
>
> Igniters,
> Recently I am looking into a new pub/sub messaging Apache incubator project called RocketMQ [1], originally developed at Alibaba. And I am thinking about implementing a streamer for Ignite.
> Do you think it has to be placed under modules/ of Ignite project, or better to have it together with other RocketMQ Community Projects [2]? I talked to the project's lead -- any approach seems to be ok.
> I anticipate quite frequent releases of the project this year (much more frequent than Ignite's), and I think it will be easier to release such integration updates with the 2nd approach, as soon as a new RocketMQ's (or Ignite's) version is available.
> Any thoughts?
> [1] http://rocketmq.apache.org/[2] https://github.com/rocketmq
> Roman
Re: Integration with RocketMQ
Posted by Denis Magda <dm...@apache.org>.
Roman,
Does it make sense to have corresponding integration modules in both projects?
For instance, there is Camel and Ignite integration that is hosted in both projects.
https://github.com/apache/ignite/tree/master/modules/camel
https://github.com/apache/camel/tree/master/components/camel-ignite <https://github.com/apache/camel/tree/master/components/camel-ignite>
I do believe that the modules are not 100% identical and the reason it’s done this way might be because the modules use different Camel or Ignite interfaces and concepts. Is this approach somehow related to RocketMQ and Ignite?
—
Denis
> On Jan 9, 2017, at 11:06 PM, Roman Shtykh <rs...@yahoo.com.INVALID> wrote:
>
> Igniters,
> Recently I am looking into a new pub/sub messaging Apache incubator project called RocketMQ [1], originally developed at Alibaba. And I am thinking about implementing a streamer for Ignite.
> Do you think it has to be placed under modules/ of Ignite project, or better to have it together with other RocketMQ Community Projects [2]? I talked to the project's lead -- any approach seems to be ok.
> I anticipate quite frequent releases of the project this year (much more frequent than Ignite's), and I think it will be easier to release such integration updates with the 2nd approach, as soon as a new RocketMQ's (or Ignite's) version is available.
> Any thoughts?
> [1] http://rocketmq.apache.org/[2] https://github.com/rocketmq
> Roman