You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cassandra.apache.org by Paul Cichonski <pa...@lithium.com> on 2014/02/22 01:11:10 UTC

Product Catalog Data Format Investigation (NOW-18)

Hey All,

I've documented the results of my investigation into product data standards here: http://confluence.dev.lithium.com/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=47110202.

Unfortunately it does not seem like there is a clear winner, but hopefully customer input will help drive our choice. Personally, I think that since our internal schema is likely to be a very small subset of what these standards express, that it will be feasible to support all of them out of the box and simply map the data we care about into our internal representation.

Comments/Ideas are welcome (please add to confluence).

Thanks,
Paul

RE: Product Catalog Data Format Investigation (NOW-18)

Posted by Paul Cichonski <pa...@lithium.com>.
Sorry about that, definitely wrong list. please disregard. 
________________________________________
From: Michael Kjellman <mk...@barracuda.com>
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2014 4:14 PM
To: dev@cassandra.apache.org
Subject: Re: Product Catalog Data Format Investigation (NOW-18)

Your link doesn¹t resolve and I¹m 99% sure you have the wrong mailing list.

Best,
Michael

On 2/21/14, 4:11 PM, "Paul Cichonski" <pa...@lithium.com> wrote:

>Hey All,
>
>I've documented the results of my investigation into product data
>standards here:
>http://confluence.dev.lithium.com/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=47110202.
>
>Unfortunately it does not seem like there is a clear winner, but
>hopefully customer input will help drive our choice. Personally, I think
>that since our internal schema is likely to be a very small subset of
>what these standards express, that it will be feasible to support all of
>them out of the box and simply map the data we care about into our
>internal representation.
>
>Comments/Ideas are welcome (please add to confluence).
>
>Thanks,
>Paul


===========================================================



Find out how eSigning generates significant financial benefit.

Read the Barracuda SignNow ROI whitepaper at https://signnow.com/l/business/esignature_roi


Re: Product Catalog Data Format Investigation (NOW-18)

Posted by Michael Kjellman <mk...@barracuda.com>.
Your link doesn¹t resolve and I¹m 99% sure you have the wrong mailing list.

Best,
Michael

On 2/21/14, 4:11 PM, "Paul Cichonski" <pa...@lithium.com> wrote:

>Hey All,
>
>I've documented the results of my investigation into product data
>standards here: 
>http://confluence.dev.lithium.com/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=47110202.
>
>Unfortunately it does not seem like there is a clear winner, but
>hopefully customer input will help drive our choice. Personally, I think
>that since our internal schema is likely to be a very small subset of
>what these standards express, that it will be feasible to support all of
>them out of the box and simply map the data we care about into our
>internal representation.
>
>Comments/Ideas are welcome (please add to confluence).
>
>Thanks,
>Paul


===========================================================

Find out how eSigning generates significant financial benefit.
Read the Barracuda SignNow ROI whitepaper at https://signnow.com/l/business/esignature_roi