You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@uima.apache.org by Peter Klügl <pk...@uni-wuerzburg.de> on 2013/02/06 16:33:39 UTC
[VOTE] Apache UIMA TextMarker RC4 AND Composite Repository
Hi,
the fourth release candidate of the sandbox project Apache UIMA
TextMarker is ready for voting. This vote also includes our new
composite repository.
Staging repository:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-204/
SVN tag:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/sandbox/textmarker/tags/textmarker-2.0.0-rc4
Composite repository with three update sites: uimaj, uima-as and
textmarker-2.0.0:
http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/uima-releases/textmarker-2.0.0-rc4/eclipse-update-site
Archive with all sources:
http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/uima-releases/textmarker-2.0.0-rc4/source/textmarker-2.0.0-source-release.zip
Binary distributions:
http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/uima-releases/textmarker-2.0.0-rc4/dist/
The issues fixed are in the RELEASE_NOTES.html in the src/bin packages.
They can also be found here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%222.0.0TextMarker%22%20AND%20component%20%3D%20TextMarker%20AND%20status%20in%20(Resolved%2C%20Closed)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
ONLY FOR REVIEWING:
Documentation (pdf file):
http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/uima-releases/textmarker-2.0.0-rc4/tools.textmarker.book.pdf
Please vote on release:
[ ] +1 OK to release
[ ] 0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
Thanks.
Peter
Re: [VOTE] Apache UIMA TextMarker RC4 AND Composite Repository
Posted by Peter Klügl <pk...@uni-wuerzburg.de>.
On 08.02.2013 23:49, Marshall Schor wrote:
> On 2/8/2013 8:02 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
>> After another round of reviewing:
>> - (known issue) additional files LICENSE.txt and NOTICE.txt in
>> textmarker-ep-engine-2.0.0\META-INF. However, files LICENSE and NOTICE are OK.
> I poked around and saw that this happens when the unpacking of dependent JARs
> into target/classes is done. Some of these Jars have their own MANIFEST
> directory, and at least one of them has a LICENSE.txt and NOTICE.txt files (the
> org.apache.commons commons-lang3 version 3.1 Jar).
>
> Of course, any of the included JARs could have their own LICENSE and NOTICE
> files, and they would "overlay" one another during the unpacking. This is why I
> had earlier suggested finding a way to not do the unpacking. :-) I finally
> tracked down where we did a change like this in UIMA-2176; if you want (at some
> point) to pursue doing something similar, it could provide an example. The
> separate build for OSGi bundles was removed in UIMA-2184. You can see the build
> in the uima-wide parent pom in the profile with id "build OSGi bundle for
> annotator".
>
> Dependent jars are put into a /lib/ directory without unpacking them. Then, an
> instruction:
>
> <Bundle-ClassPath> is set up to include those Jars.
>
> This approach lets each Dependent Jar keep its own LICENSE and NOTICE files :-).
>
> I'm unsure how important it is to avoid having the embedded/unpacked JARs have
> their LICENSE/NOTICE files potentially overridden. I suppose if all of the
> embedded JARs were manually checked to "bubble up" any LICENSEs / NOTICEs, then
> it would be OK. If there were no LICENSEs / NOTICEs in an enbedded JAR, then I
> think we would need to get this info from the project itself. You've probably
> done all this already; I'm just coming behind and checking...
I have already tried something like <Bundle-ClassPath> when I created
the build process for the engine plugin, but could not resolve all problems.
I will take a closer look at the issues you mentioned. And maybe I will
get Richard's changes in UIMA-2560 up and running.
Peter
> -Marshall
Re: [VOTE] Apache UIMA TextMarker RC4 AND Composite Repository
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
On 2/8/2013 8:02 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
> After another round of reviewing:
> - (known issue) additional files LICENSE.txt and NOTICE.txt in
> textmarker-ep-engine-2.0.0\META-INF. However, files LICENSE and NOTICE are OK.
I poked around and saw that this happens when the unpacking of dependent JARs
into target/classes is done. Some of these Jars have their own MANIFEST
directory, and at least one of them has a LICENSE.txt and NOTICE.txt files (the
org.apache.commons commons-lang3 version 3.1 Jar).
Of course, any of the included JARs could have their own LICENSE and NOTICE
files, and they would "overlay" one another during the unpacking. This is why I
had earlier suggested finding a way to not do the unpacking. :-) I finally
tracked down where we did a change like this in UIMA-2176; if you want (at some
point) to pursue doing something similar, it could provide an example. The
separate build for OSGi bundles was removed in UIMA-2184. You can see the build
in the uima-wide parent pom in the profile with id "build OSGi bundle for
annotator".
Dependent jars are put into a /lib/ directory without unpacking them. Then, an
instruction:
<Bundle-ClassPath> is set up to include those Jars.
This approach lets each Dependent Jar keep its own LICENSE and NOTICE files :-).
I'm unsure how important it is to avoid having the embedded/unpacked JARs have
their LICENSE/NOTICE files potentially overridden. I suppose if all of the
embedded JARs were manually checked to "bubble up" any LICENSEs / NOTICEs, then
it would be OK. If there were no LICENSEs / NOTICEs in an enbedded JAR, then I
think we would need to get this info from the project itself. You've probably
done all this already; I'm just coming behind and checking...
-Marshall
Re: [VOTE] Apache UIMA TextMarker RC4 AND Composite Repository
Posted by Peter Klügl <pk...@uni-wuerzburg.de>.
After another round of reviewing:
- (known issue) additional files LICENSE.txt and NOTICE.txt in
textmarker-ep-engine-2.0.0\META-INF. However, files LICENSE and NOTICE
are OK.
- (known issue) the sources and source-release contain built files,
e.g., MANIFEST.MF for plugins.
- (new issue) the binary distributions contain only TextMarker binaries,
but not the libraries that are needed to use textmarker-core.jar, e.g.,
uima-core, uima-document-annotation, antlr, htmlparser and so on.
Actually, the engine plugin contains the binaries that are not shipped
in the uima plugins. I personally would not include everything.
I hope that I have not missed anything and that these issues are not
blockers.
Anyways, I vote +1
Best,
Peter
On 06.02.2013 16:33, Peter Klügl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the fourth release candidate of the sandbox project Apache UIMA
> TextMarker is ready for voting. This vote also includes our new
> composite repository.
>
> Staging repository:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-204/
>
> SVN tag:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/sandbox/textmarker/tags/textmarker-2.0.0-rc4
>
>
> Composite repository with three update sites: uimaj, uima-as and
> textmarker-2.0.0:
> http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/uima-releases/textmarker-2.0.0-rc4/eclipse-update-site
>
>
> Archive with all sources:
> http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/uima-releases/textmarker-2.0.0-rc4/source/textmarker-2.0.0-source-release.zip
>
>
> Binary distributions:
> http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/uima-releases/textmarker-2.0.0-rc4/dist/
>
>
> The issues fixed are in the RELEASE_NOTES.html in the src/bin packages.
> They can also be found here:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%222.0.0TextMarker%22%20AND%20component%20%3D%20TextMarker%20AND%20status%20in%20(Resolved%2C%20Closed)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
>
>
>
> ONLY FOR REVIEWING:
>
> Documentation (pdf file):
> http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/uima-releases/textmarker-2.0.0-rc4/tools.textmarker.book.pdf
>
>
>
> Please vote on release:
>
> [ ] +1 OK to release
> [ ] 0 Don't care
> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
>
> Thanks.
>
> Peter
typo in RELEASE_NOTES.html (not a blocker)
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
In line:
Click <a href="issuesFixed/jira-report.html">issuesFixed/jira-report.hmtl</a>for
the list of
replace "hmtl" with "html"
Re: [VOTE][CANCELLED] Apache UIMA TextMarker RC4 AND Composite Repository
Posted by Peter Klügl <pk...@uni-wuerzburg.de>.
Cancelling this vote and started a new one.
Peter
On 06.02.2013 16:33, Peter Klügl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the fourth release candidate of the sandbox project Apache UIMA
> TextMarker is ready for voting. This vote also includes our new
> composite repository.
>
> Staging repository:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-204/
>
> SVN tag:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/sandbox/textmarker/tags/textmarker-2.0.0-rc4
>
>
> Composite repository with three update sites: uimaj, uima-as and
> textmarker-2.0.0:
> http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/uima-releases/textmarker-2.0.0-rc4/eclipse-update-site
>
>
> Archive with all sources:
> http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/uima-releases/textmarker-2.0.0-rc4/source/textmarker-2.0.0-source-release.zip
>
>
> Binary distributions:
> http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/uima-releases/textmarker-2.0.0-rc4/dist/
>
>
> The issues fixed are in the RELEASE_NOTES.html in the src/bin packages.
> They can also be found here:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%222.0.0TextMarker%22%20AND%20component%20%3D%20TextMarker%20AND%20status%20in%20(Resolved%2C%20Closed)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
>
>
>
> ONLY FOR REVIEWING:
>
> Documentation (pdf file):
> http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/uima-releases/textmarker-2.0.0-rc4/tools.textmarker.book.pdf
>
>
>
> Please vote on release:
>
> [ ] +1 OK to release
> [ ] 0 Don't care
> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
>
> Thanks.
>
> Peter
Re: [VOTE] Apache UIMA TextMarker RC4 AND Composite Repository
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
Hi, Peter, thanks for looking into this.
I was mainly worried if some other change happened which might have made the
build questionable, but your explanation makes perfect sense :-) , and the build
order for RC-4 looks fine to me.
I don't think this warrants a complex fix; I don't think it's that significant.
The source-release zip already contains some extra stuff (like the generated
"issues fixed", which I think is a good thing).
So, I say, let's mark this down as a slight issue, but certainly not a blocker
for releasing :-)
I'll continue testing (probably tomorrow - running out of time today).
-Marshall
On 2/7/2013 3:43 PM, Peter Klügl wrote:
> Am 07.02.2013 17:18, schrieb Marshall Schor:
>> Something happened with the source-release.zip build.
>>
>> The source-release.zip now contains files not in SVN that are "generated files"
>> by the build.
>>
>> The mvn release:perform is supposed to check out the tag (which would not have
>> the generated files), and run the assembly to produce the source zip before
>> running other steps that would produce the generated files.
>>
>> In the previous rc-3 this worked OK. So something went wrong here.
>>
>> Some examples of generated files in the source-release.zip not in the SVN tag:
>>
>> textmarker-eclipse-feature: /feature.xml
>>
>> textmarker-ep-engine: /META-INF/MANIFEST.MF (this file has only the Apache
>> license header plus an empty <plugin> </plugin> element.
>>
>> textmarker-ep-ide: /META-INF/MANIFEST.MF
>
> Sorry, I missed that when I checked the RC.
>
> My first guess (with my limited maven knowledge) was that it is caused by the
> changed order of the reactor build as you mentioned it in your email:
>
> rc-3:
> [INFO] Reactor Build Order:
> [INFO]
> [INFO] Apache UIMA TextMarker: textmarker
> [INFO] Apache UIMA TextMarker: textmarker-core
> [INFO] Apache UIMA TextMarker Eclipse: textmarker-ep-engine
> [INFO] Apache UIMA TextMarker Eclipse: textmarker-ep-ide
> [INFO] Apache UIMA TextMarker Eclipse: textmarker-ep-caseditor
> [INFO] Apache UIMA TextMarker Eclipse: textmarker-ep-addons
> [INFO] Apache UIMA TextMarker Eclipse: textmarker-ep-textruler
> [INFO] Apache UIMA TextMarker Documentation
> [INFO] Apache UIMA TextMarker Eclipse: textmarker-eclipse-feature
>
> rc-4:
> [INFO] Reactor Build Order:
> [INFO]
> [INFO] Apache UIMA TextMarker: textmarker-parent
> [INFO] Apache UIMA TextMarker: textmarker-core
> [INFO] Apache UIMA TextMarker Eclipse: textmarker-ep-engine
> [INFO] Apache UIMA TextMarker Eclipse: textmarker-ep-ide
> [INFO] Apache UIMA TextMarker Eclipse: textmarker-ep-caseditor
> [INFO] Apache UIMA TextMarker Eclipse: textmarker-ep-addons
> [INFO] Apache UIMA TextMarker Eclipse: textmarker-ep-textruler
> [INFO] Apache UIMA TextMarker Documentation
> [INFO] Apache UIMA TextMarker Eclipse: textmarker-eclipse-feature
> [INFO] Apache UIMA TextMarker: textmarker
>
> rc-3 created the source-release before the modules are built, but rc-4 does
> that as the last step. This maybe explains why these files are located in the
> archive.
>
> Then, I took a look at how uimaj does it. A study of the poms resulted in no
> ideas what went wrong. My next step was to build uimaj and take a look at the
> console. I used uimaj-2.4.0, because rat complains about the trunk (11 files).
> The order is quite similar, so my next guess was that the reactor order is
> probably not the reason. Then, I actually checked
> uimaj-2.4.0-source-release.zip and found that there the same problem occurs,
> e.g., uimaj-ep-cas-editor contains a MANIFEST.MF.
>
> So, what now?
>
> I suppose that the reactor order is determined by the dependencies and the
> parent relationship and cannot be influenced?
>
> Peter
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache UIMA TextMarker RC4 AND Composite Repository
Posted by Peter Klügl <pk...@uni-wuerzburg.de>.
Am 07.02.2013 17:18, schrieb Marshall Schor:
> Something happened with the source-release.zip build.
>
> The source-release.zip now contains files not in SVN that are "generated files"
> by the build.
>
> The mvn release:perform is supposed to check out the tag (which would not have
> the generated files), and run the assembly to produce the source zip before
> running other steps that would produce the generated files.
>
> In the previous rc-3 this worked OK. So something went wrong here.
>
> Some examples of generated files in the source-release.zip not in the SVN tag:
>
> textmarker-eclipse-feature: /feature.xml
>
> textmarker-ep-engine: /META-INF/MANIFEST.MF (this file has only the Apache
> license header plus an empty <plugin> </plugin> element.
>
> textmarker-ep-ide: /META-INF/MANIFEST.MF
Sorry, I missed that when I checked the RC.
My first guess (with my limited maven knowledge) was that it is caused
by the changed order of the reactor build as you mentioned it in your email:
rc-3:
[INFO] Reactor Build Order:
[INFO]
[INFO] Apache UIMA TextMarker: textmarker
[INFO] Apache UIMA TextMarker: textmarker-core
[INFO] Apache UIMA TextMarker Eclipse: textmarker-ep-engine
[INFO] Apache UIMA TextMarker Eclipse: textmarker-ep-ide
[INFO] Apache UIMA TextMarker Eclipse: textmarker-ep-caseditor
[INFO] Apache UIMA TextMarker Eclipse: textmarker-ep-addons
[INFO] Apache UIMA TextMarker Eclipse: textmarker-ep-textruler
[INFO] Apache UIMA TextMarker Documentation
[INFO] Apache UIMA TextMarker Eclipse: textmarker-eclipse-feature
rc-4:
[INFO] Reactor Build Order:
[INFO]
[INFO] Apache UIMA TextMarker: textmarker-parent
[INFO] Apache UIMA TextMarker: textmarker-core
[INFO] Apache UIMA TextMarker Eclipse: textmarker-ep-engine
[INFO] Apache UIMA TextMarker Eclipse: textmarker-ep-ide
[INFO] Apache UIMA TextMarker Eclipse: textmarker-ep-caseditor
[INFO] Apache UIMA TextMarker Eclipse: textmarker-ep-addons
[INFO] Apache UIMA TextMarker Eclipse: textmarker-ep-textruler
[INFO] Apache UIMA TextMarker Documentation
[INFO] Apache UIMA TextMarker Eclipse: textmarker-eclipse-feature
[INFO] Apache UIMA TextMarker: textmarker
rc-3 created the source-release before the modules are built, but rc-4
does that as the last step. This maybe explains why these files are
located in the archive.
Then, I took a look at how uimaj does it. A study of the poms resulted
in no ideas what went wrong. My next step was to build uimaj and take a
look at the console. I used uimaj-2.4.0, because rat complains about the
trunk (11 files). The order is quite similar, so my next guess was that
the reactor order is probably not the reason. Then, I actually checked
uimaj-2.4.0-source-release.zip and found that there the same problem
occurs, e.g., uimaj-ep-cas-editor contains a MANIFEST.MF.
So, what now?
I suppose that the reactor order is determined by the dependencies and
the parent relationship and cannot be influenced?
Peter
> ...
>
> -Marshall
>
> On 2/6/2013 10:33 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> the fourth release candidate of the sandbox project Apache UIMA TextMarker is
>> ready for voting. This vote also includes our new composite repository.
>>
>> Staging repository:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-204/
>>
>> SVN tag:
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/sandbox/textmarker/tags/textmarker-2.0.0-rc4
>>
>>
>> Composite repository with three update sites: uimaj, uima-as and
>> textmarker-2.0.0:
>> http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/uima-releases/textmarker-2.0.0-rc4/eclipse-update-site
>>
>>
>> Archive with all sources:
>> http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/uima-releases/textmarker-2.0.0-rc4/source/textmarker-2.0.0-source-release.zip
>>
>>
>> Binary distributions:
>> http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/uima-releases/textmarker-2.0.0-rc4/dist/
>>
>> The issues fixed are in the RELEASE_NOTES.html in the src/bin packages.
>> They can also be found here:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%222.0.0TextMarker%22%20AND%20component%20%3D%20TextMarker%20AND%20status%20in%20(Resolved%2C%20Closed)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
>>
>>
>>
>> ONLY FOR REVIEWING:
>>
>> Documentation (pdf file):
>> http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/uima-releases/textmarker-2.0.0-rc4/tools.textmarker.book.pdf
>>
>>
>>
>> Please vote on release:
>>
>> [ ] +1 OK to release
>> [ ] 0 Don't care
>> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Peter
>>
Re: [VOTE] Apache UIMA TextMarker RC4 AND Composite Repository
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
Something happened with the source-release.zip build.
The source-release.zip now contains files not in SVN that are "generated files"
by the build.
The mvn release:perform is supposed to check out the tag (which would not have
the generated files), and run the assembly to produce the source zip before
running other steps that would produce the generated files.
In the previous rc-3 this worked OK. So something went wrong here.
Some examples of generated files in the source-release.zip not in the SVN tag:
textmarker-eclipse-feature: /feature.xml
textmarker-ep-engine: /META-INF/MANIFEST.MF (this file has only the Apache
license header plus an empty <plugin> </plugin> element.
textmarker-ep-ide: /META-INF/MANIFEST.MF
...
-Marshall
On 2/6/2013 10:33 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the fourth release candidate of the sandbox project Apache UIMA TextMarker is
> ready for voting. This vote also includes our new composite repository.
>
> Staging repository:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-204/
>
> SVN tag:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/sandbox/textmarker/tags/textmarker-2.0.0-rc4
>
>
> Composite repository with three update sites: uimaj, uima-as and
> textmarker-2.0.0:
> http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/uima-releases/textmarker-2.0.0-rc4/eclipse-update-site
>
>
> Archive with all sources:
> http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/uima-releases/textmarker-2.0.0-rc4/source/textmarker-2.0.0-source-release.zip
>
>
> Binary distributions:
> http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/uima-releases/textmarker-2.0.0-rc4/dist/
>
> The issues fixed are in the RELEASE_NOTES.html in the src/bin packages.
> They can also be found here:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%222.0.0TextMarker%22%20AND%20component%20%3D%20TextMarker%20AND%20status%20in%20(Resolved%2C%20Closed)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
>
>
>
> ONLY FOR REVIEWING:
>
> Documentation (pdf file):
> http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/uima-releases/textmarker-2.0.0-rc4/tools.textmarker.book.pdf
>
>
>
> Please vote on release:
>
> [ ] +1 OK to release
> [ ] 0 Don't care
> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
>
> Thanks.
>
> Peter
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache UIMA TextMarker RC4 AND Composite Repository
Posted by Peter Klügl <pk...@uni-wuerzburg.de>.
On 08.02.2013 15:03, Marshall Schor wrote:
> In the source-release.zip, the LICENSE file has a defective copy of the creative
> commons license, in that the sub-headings (e.g. "a", "b",...) are missing.
> These are used (referred to) by the license, so they have to be there :-).
>
> An example of reference:
>
> If You create a Derivative Work, upon notice
> from any Licensor You must, to the extent practicable, remove from the
> Derivative Work any credit as required by clause 4(b), as requested.
>
> But there is no (b) under "4".
>
> These are in the original license pointed to by the url.
>
> When fixing this, please check other places where this might have been copied
> incorrectly; I only looked here...
fixed.
I will prepare another RC.
Peter
> -Marshall
>
>
> On 2/6/2013 10:33 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> the fourth release candidate of the sandbox project Apache UIMA TextMarker is
>> ready for voting. This vote also includes our new composite repository.
>>
>> Staging repository:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-204/
>>
>> SVN tag:
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/sandbox/textmarker/tags/textmarker-2.0.0-rc4
>>
>>
>> Composite repository with three update sites: uimaj, uima-as and
>> textmarker-2.0.0:
>> http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/uima-releases/textmarker-2.0.0-rc4/eclipse-update-site
>>
>>
>> Archive with all sources:
>> http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/uima-releases/textmarker-2.0.0-rc4/source/textmarker-2.0.0-source-release.zip
>>
>>
>> Binary distributions:
>> http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/uima-releases/textmarker-2.0.0-rc4/dist/
>>
>> The issues fixed are in the RELEASE_NOTES.html in the src/bin packages.
>> They can also be found here:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%222.0.0TextMarker%22%20AND%20component%20%3D%20TextMarker%20AND%20status%20in%20(Resolved%2C%20Closed)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
>>
>>
>>
>> ONLY FOR REVIEWING:
>>
>> Documentation (pdf file):
>> http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/uima-releases/textmarker-2.0.0-rc4/tools.textmarker.book.pdf
>>
>>
>>
>> Please vote on release:
>>
>> [ ] +1 OK to release
>> [ ] 0 Don't care
>> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Peter
>>
Re: [VOTE] Apache UIMA TextMarker RC4 AND Composite Repository
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
In the source-release.zip, the LICENSE file has a defective copy of the creative
commons license, in that the sub-headings (e.g. "a", "b",...) are missing.
These are used (referred to) by the license, so they have to be there :-).
An example of reference:
If You create a Derivative Work, upon notice
from any Licensor You must, to the extent practicable, remove from the
Derivative Work any credit as required by clause 4(b), as requested.
But there is no (b) under "4".
These are in the original license pointed to by the url.
When fixing this, please check other places where this might have been copied
incorrectly; I only looked here...
-Marshall
On 2/6/2013 10:33 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the fourth release candidate of the sandbox project Apache UIMA TextMarker is
> ready for voting. This vote also includes our new composite repository.
>
> Staging repository:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-204/
>
> SVN tag:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/sandbox/textmarker/tags/textmarker-2.0.0-rc4
>
>
> Composite repository with three update sites: uimaj, uima-as and
> textmarker-2.0.0:
> http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/uima-releases/textmarker-2.0.0-rc4/eclipse-update-site
>
>
> Archive with all sources:
> http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/uima-releases/textmarker-2.0.0-rc4/source/textmarker-2.0.0-source-release.zip
>
>
> Binary distributions:
> http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/uima-releases/textmarker-2.0.0-rc4/dist/
>
> The issues fixed are in the RELEASE_NOTES.html in the src/bin packages.
> They can also be found here:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%222.0.0TextMarker%22%20AND%20component%20%3D%20TextMarker%20AND%20status%20in%20(Resolved%2C%20Closed)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
>
>
>
> ONLY FOR REVIEWING:
>
> Documentation (pdf file):
> http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/uima-releases/textmarker-2.0.0-rc4/tools.textmarker.book.pdf
>
>
>
> Please vote on release:
>
> [ ] +1 OK to release
> [ ] 0 Don't care
> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
>
> Thanks.
>
> Peter
>