You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@hbase.apache.org by Stack <st...@duboce.net> on 2018/01/09 03:43:28 UTC
[VOTE] The second hbase-2.0.0-beta-1 Release Candidate is available
for download
The second release candidate for HBase 2.0.0-beta-1 is up at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-2.0.0-beta-1-RC1/
Maven artifacts are available from a staging directory here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1190
All was signed with my key at 8ACC93D2 [1]
I tagged the RC as 2.0.0-beta-1-RC1.5 (It took a few attempts) at
hash 4c31374a90a487e19a6ef04d7b7adba43dd92ecf
This second RC has fix nice bug fixes over RC0 including fix for failing
and flakey tests.
hbase-2.0.0-beta-1 is our first beta release. It includes all that was in
previous alphas (new assignment manager, offheap read/write path, in-memory
compactions, etc.). The APIs and feature-set are sealed.
hbase-2.0.0-beta-1 is a not-for-production preview of hbase-2.0.0. It is
meant for devs and downstreamers to test drive and flag us if we messed up
on anything ahead of our rolling GAs. We are particular interested in
hearing from Coprocessor developers.
The list of features addressed in 2.0.0 so far can be found here [3]. There
are thousands. The list of ~2k+ fixes in 2.0.0 exclusively can be found
here [4] (My JIRA JQL foo is a bit dodgy -- forgive me if mistakes).
I've updated our overview doc. on the state of 2.0.0 [6]. We'll do one more
beta before we put up our first 2.0.0 Release Candidate by the end of
January, 2.0.0-beta-2. Its focus will be making it so users can do a
rolling upgrade on to hbase-2.x from hbase-1.x (and any bug fixes found
running beta-1). Here is the list of what we have targeted so far for
beta-2 [5]. Check it out.
One known issue is that the User API has not been properly filtered so it
shows more than just InterfaceAudience Public content (HBASE-19663, to be
fixed by beta-2).
Please take this beta for a spin. Please vote on whether it ok to put out
this RC as our first beta (Note CHANGES has not yet been updated). Let the
VOTE be open for 72 hours (Wednesday evening)
Thanks,
Your 2.0.0 Release Manager
1. http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x9816C7FC8ACC93D2
3. https://goo.gl/scYjJr
4. https://goo.gl/dFFT8b
5. https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/HBASE/versions/12340862
6. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WCsVlnHjJeKUcl7wHwqb4
z9iEu_ktczrlKHK8N4SZzs/
Re: [VOTE] The second hbase-2.0.0-beta-1 Release Candidate is
available for download
Posted by Stack <st...@duboce.net>.
Thanks Andrew.
Let me work on this.
RC is sunk. Will put up a new one after I address the above failure.
S
On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 10:03 AM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org> wrote:
> -1
>
> Checked sums and signatures: ok
> RAT check passes: ok (8u144)
> Built from source: ok (8u144)
> Unit tests pass: failed (8u144), TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool always fails
>
>
> TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool.org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.
> TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool
> can fail with OOME if not run in isolation.
>
> If run in isolation, I get
>
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool.
> testLABChunkQueueWithMultipleMSLABs(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.
> TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool)
> [ERROR] Run 1:
> TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool.testLABChunkQueueWithMultipleMSLABs:143 All the
> chunks must have been cleared
> [ERROR] Run 2:
> TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool.testLABChunkQueueWithMultipleMSLABs:143 All the
> chunks must have been cleared
> [ERROR] Run 3:
> TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool.testLABChunkQueueWithMultipleMSLABs:143 All the
> chunks must have been cleared
> [ERROR] Run 4:
> TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool.testLABChunkQueueWithMultipleMSLABs:143 All the
> chunks must have been cleared
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 7:43 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>
> > The second release candidate for HBase 2.0.0-beta-1 is up at:
> >
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-2.0.0-beta-1-RC1/
> >
> > Maven artifacts are available from a staging directory here:
> >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1190
> >
> > All was signed with my key at 8ACC93D2 [1]
> >
> > I tagged the RC as 2.0.0-beta-1-RC1.5 (It took a few attempts) at
> > hash 4c31374a90a487e19a6ef04d7b7adba43dd92ecf
> >
> > This second RC has fix nice bug fixes over RC0 including fix for failing
> > and flakey tests.
> >
> > hbase-2.0.0-beta-1 is our first beta release. It includes all that was in
> > previous alphas (new assignment manager, offheap read/write path,
> in-memory
> > compactions, etc.). The APIs and feature-set are sealed.
> >
> > hbase-2.0.0-beta-1 is a not-for-production preview of hbase-2.0.0. It is
> > meant for devs and downstreamers to test drive and flag us if we messed
> up
> > on anything ahead of our rolling GAs. We are particular interested in
> > hearing from Coprocessor developers.
> >
> > The list of features addressed in 2.0.0 so far can be found here [3].
> There
> > are thousands. The list of ~2k+ fixes in 2.0.0 exclusively can be found
> > here [4] (My JIRA JQL foo is a bit dodgy -- forgive me if mistakes).
> >
> > I've updated our overview doc. on the state of 2.0.0 [6]. We'll do one
> more
> > beta before we put up our first 2.0.0 Release Candidate by the end of
> > January, 2.0.0-beta-2. Its focus will be making it so users can do a
> > rolling upgrade on to hbase-2.x from hbase-1.x (and any bug fixes found
> > running beta-1). Here is the list of what we have targeted so far for
> > beta-2 [5]. Check it out.
> >
> > One known issue is that the User API has not been properly filtered so it
> > shows more than just InterfaceAudience Public content (HBASE-19663, to be
> > fixed by beta-2).
> >
> > Please take this beta for a spin. Please vote on whether it ok to put out
> > this RC as our first beta (Note CHANGES has not yet been updated). Let
> the
> > VOTE be open for 72 hours (Wednesday evening)
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Your 2.0.0 Release Manager
> >
> > 1. http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x9816C7FC8ACC93D2
> > 3. https://goo.gl/scYjJr
> > 4. https://goo.gl/dFFT8b
> > 5. https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/HBASE/versions/12340862
> > 6. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WCsVlnHjJeKUcl7wHwqb4
> > z9iEu_ktczrlKHK8N4SZzs/
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Andrew
>
> Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from truth's
> decrepit hands
> - A23, Crosstalk
>
Re: [VOTE] The second hbase-2.0.0-beta-1 Release Candidate is
available for download
Posted by Stack <st...@duboce.net>.
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 6:37 AM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari <
jean-marc@spaggiari.org> wrote:
> "Remaining KVs" field in master WebUI shows negative values... Is that
> tracked anywhere?
>
>
No.
Yeah, this one is sunk. Trying to put up a new one. Taking a while!
Thanks JMS (and Balazs, Yu Li....).
St.Ack
> 2018-01-10 5:12 GMT-05:00 Jean-Marc Spaggiari <je...@spaggiari.org>:
>
> > Oh, you're right! I missed it! Ok. Thanks. Will wait for the next one.
> >
> > JM
> >
> > 2018-01-10 5:00 GMT-05:00 Yu Li <ca...@gmail.com>:
> >
> >> I believe this one is already sunk according to stack's reply:
> >>
> >> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> >> From: Stack <st...@duboce.net>
> >> Date: 10 January 2018 at 02:09
> >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] The second hbase-2.0.0-beta-1 Release Candidate is
> >> available for download
> >> To: HBase Dev List <de...@hbase.apache.org>
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks Andrew.
> >>
> >> Let me work on this.
> >>
> >> RC is sunk. Will put up a new one after I address the above failure.
> >>
> >> Best Regards,
> >> Yu
> >>
> >> On 10 January 2018 at 17:54, Jean-Marc Spaggiari <
> jean-marc@spaggiari.org
> >> >
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Are we going to sink this one because of Andrew's -1?
> >> >
> >> > If so I will wait for the next one to test it...
> >> >
> >> > Le 10 janv. 2018 03 h 24, "Balazs Meszaros" <
> >> balazs.meszaros@cloudera.com>
> >> > a écrit :
> >> >
> >> > > +1
> >> > >
> >> > > - signatures, checksums OK,
> >> > > - unit tests passes (8u112),
> >> > > - shell works,
> >> > > - load test tool also successed.
> >> > >
> >> > > Best regards,
> >> > > Balazs
> >> > >
> >> > > On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 10:38 PM, Andrew Purtell <
> apurtell@apache.org>
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > Linux here.
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 1:13 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > Andrew:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > I don't see this:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > [INFO] -------------------------------------------------------
> >> > > > > [INFO] T E S T S
> >> > > > > [INFO] -------------------------------------------------------
> >> > > > > [INFO] Running
> >> > > > > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool
> >> > > > > [INFO] Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time
> >> > elapsed:
> >> > > > > 4.409 s - in org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.
> >> > > > > TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool
> >> > > > > [INFO]
> >> > > > > [INFO] Results:
> >> > > > > [INFO]
> >> > > > > [INFO] Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Linux and Mac.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > What you reckon sir?
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > St.Ack
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 10:03 AM, Andrew Purtell <
> >> apurtell@apache.org
> >> > >
> >> > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > > -1
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > Checked sums and signatures: ok
> >> > > > > > RAT check passes: ok (8u144)
> >> > > > > > Built from source: ok (8u144)
> >> > > > > > Unit tests pass: failed (8u144), TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool
> >> always
> >> > > > fails
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool.org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionser
> >> ver.
> >> > > > > > TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool
> >> > > > > > can fail with OOME if not run in isolation.
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > If run in isolation, I get
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.TestMemstoreLABWithoutP
> >> ool.
> >> > > > > > testLABChunkQueueWithMultipleMSLABs(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.
> >> > > > > regionserver.
> >> > > > > > TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool)
> >> > > > > > [ERROR] Run 1:
> >> > > > > > TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool.testLABChunkQueueWithMultipleMSLA
> >> Bs:143
> >> > > All
> >> > > > > the
> >> > > > > > chunks must have been cleared
> >> > > > > > [ERROR] Run 2:
> >> > > > > > TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool.testLABChunkQueueWithMultipleMSLA
> >> Bs:143
> >> > > All
> >> > > > > the
> >> > > > > > chunks must have been cleared
> >> > > > > > [ERROR] Run 3:
> >> > > > > > TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool.testLABChunkQueueWithMultipleMSLA
> >> Bs:143
> >> > > All
> >> > > > > the
> >> > > > > > chunks must have been cleared
> >> > > > > > [ERROR] Run 4:
> >> > > > > > TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool.testLABChunkQueueWithMultipleMSLA
> >> Bs:143
> >> > > All
> >> > > > > the
> >> > > > > > chunks must have been cleared
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 7:43 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net>
> wrote:
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > The second release candidate for HBase 2.0.0-beta-1 is up
> at:
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-2.0.0-
> >> > > > beta-1-RC1/
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > Maven artifacts are available from a staging directory here:
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> >> > > > > orgapachehbase-1190
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > All was signed with my key at 8ACC93D2 [1]
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > I tagged the RC as 2.0.0-beta-1-RC1.5 (It took a few
> >> attempts) at
> >> > > > > > > hash 4c31374a90a487e19a6ef04d7b7adba43dd92ecf
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > This second RC has fix nice bug fixes over RC0 including fix
> >> for
> >> > > > > failing
> >> > > > > > > and flakey tests.
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > hbase-2.0.0-beta-1 is our first beta release. It includes
> all
> >> > that
> >> > > > was
> >> > > > > in
> >> > > > > > > previous alphas (new assignment manager, offheap read/write
> >> path,
> >> > > > > > in-memory
> >> > > > > > > compactions, etc.). The APIs and feature-set are sealed.
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > hbase-2.0.0-beta-1 is a not-for-production preview of
> >> > hbase-2.0.0.
> >> > > It
> >> > > > > is
> >> > > > > > > meant for devs and downstreamers to test drive and flag us
> if
> >> we
> >> > > > messed
> >> > > > > > up
> >> > > > > > > on anything ahead of our rolling GAs. We are particular
> >> > interested
> >> > > in
> >> > > > > > > hearing from Coprocessor developers.
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > The list of features addressed in 2.0.0 so far can be found
> >> here
> >> > > [3].
> >> > > > > > There
> >> > > > > > > are thousands. The list of ~2k+ fixes in 2.0.0 exclusively
> >> can be
> >> > > > found
> >> > > > > > > here [4] (My JIRA JQL foo is a bit dodgy -- forgive me if
> >> > > mistakes).
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > I've updated our overview doc. on the state of 2.0.0 [6].
> >> We'll
> >> > do
> >> > > > one
> >> > > > > > more
> >> > > > > > > beta before we put up our first 2.0.0 Release Candidate by
> the
> >> > end
> >> > > of
> >> > > > > > > January, 2.0.0-beta-2. Its focus will be making it so users
> >> can
> >> > do
> >> > > a
> >> > > > > > > rolling upgrade on to hbase-2.x from hbase-1.x (and any bug
> >> fixes
> >> > > > found
> >> > > > > > > running beta-1). Here is the list of what we have targeted
> so
> >> far
> >> > > for
> >> > > > > > > beta-2 [5]. Check it out.
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > One known issue is that the User API has not been properly
> >> > filtered
> >> > > > so
> >> > > > > it
> >> > > > > > > shows more than just InterfaceAudience Public content
> >> > (HBASE-19663,
> >> > > > to
> >> > > > > be
> >> > > > > > > fixed by beta-2).
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > Please take this beta for a spin. Please vote on whether it
> >> ok to
> >> > > put
> >> > > > > out
> >> > > > > > > this RC as our first beta (Note CHANGES has not yet been
> >> > updated).
> >> > > > Let
> >> > > > > > the
> >> > > > > > > VOTE be open for 72 hours (Wednesday evening)
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > Thanks,
> >> > > > > > > Your 2.0.0 Release Manager
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > 1. http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=
> >> > 0x9816C7FC8ACC93D2
> >> > > > > > > 3. https://goo.gl/scYjJr
> >> > > > > > > 4. https://goo.gl/dFFT8b
> >> > > > > > > 5. https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/HBASE/versions/
> >> > 12340862
> >> > > > > > > 6. https://docs.google.com/document/d/
> 1WCsVlnHjJeKUcl7wHwqb4
> >> > > > > > > z9iEu_ktczrlKHK8N4SZzs/
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > --
> >> > > > > > Best regards,
> >> > > > > > Andrew
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from
> >> > > truth's
> >> > > > > > decrepit hands
> >> > > > > > - A23, Crosstalk
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > --
> >> > > > Best regards,
> >> > > > Andrew
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from
> >> truth's
> >> > > > decrepit hands
> >> > > > - A23, Crosstalk
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] The second hbase-2.0.0-beta-1 Release Candidate is
available for download
Posted by Jean-Marc Spaggiari <je...@spaggiari.org>.
"Remaining KVs" field in master WebUI shows negative values... Is that
tracked anywhere?
2018-01-10 5:12 GMT-05:00 Jean-Marc Spaggiari <je...@spaggiari.org>:
> Oh, you're right! I missed it! Ok. Thanks. Will wait for the next one.
>
> JM
>
> 2018-01-10 5:00 GMT-05:00 Yu Li <ca...@gmail.com>:
>
>> I believe this one is already sunk according to stack's reply:
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Stack <st...@duboce.net>
>> Date: 10 January 2018 at 02:09
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] The second hbase-2.0.0-beta-1 Release Candidate is
>> available for download
>> To: HBase Dev List <de...@hbase.apache.org>
>>
>>
>> Thanks Andrew.
>>
>> Let me work on this.
>>
>> RC is sunk. Will put up a new one after I address the above failure.
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Yu
>>
>> On 10 January 2018 at 17:54, Jean-Marc Spaggiari <jean-marc@spaggiari.org
>> >
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Are we going to sink this one because of Andrew's -1?
>> >
>> > If so I will wait for the next one to test it...
>> >
>> > Le 10 janv. 2018 03 h 24, "Balazs Meszaros" <
>> balazs.meszaros@cloudera.com>
>> > a écrit :
>> >
>> > > +1
>> > >
>> > > - signatures, checksums OK,
>> > > - unit tests passes (8u112),
>> > > - shell works,
>> > > - load test tool also successed.
>> > >
>> > > Best regards,
>> > > Balazs
>> > >
>> > > On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 10:38 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Linux here.
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 1:13 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > Andrew:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > I don't see this:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > [INFO] -------------------------------------------------------
>> > > > > [INFO] T E S T S
>> > > > > [INFO] -------------------------------------------------------
>> > > > > [INFO] Running
>> > > > > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool
>> > > > > [INFO] Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time
>> > elapsed:
>> > > > > 4.409 s - in org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.
>> > > > > TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool
>> > > > > [INFO]
>> > > > > [INFO] Results:
>> > > > > [INFO]
>> > > > > [INFO] Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Linux and Mac.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > What you reckon sir?
>> > > > >
>> > > > > St.Ack
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 10:03 AM, Andrew Purtell <
>> apurtell@apache.org
>> > >
>> > > > > wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > -1
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Checked sums and signatures: ok
>> > > > > > RAT check passes: ok (8u144)
>> > > > > > Built from source: ok (8u144)
>> > > > > > Unit tests pass: failed (8u144), TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool
>> always
>> > > > fails
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool.org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionser
>> ver.
>> > > > > > TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool
>> > > > > > can fail with OOME if not run in isolation.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > If run in isolation, I get
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.TestMemstoreLABWithoutP
>> ool.
>> > > > > > testLABChunkQueueWithMultipleMSLABs(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.
>> > > > > regionserver.
>> > > > > > TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool)
>> > > > > > [ERROR] Run 1:
>> > > > > > TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool.testLABChunkQueueWithMultipleMSLA
>> Bs:143
>> > > All
>> > > > > the
>> > > > > > chunks must have been cleared
>> > > > > > [ERROR] Run 2:
>> > > > > > TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool.testLABChunkQueueWithMultipleMSLA
>> Bs:143
>> > > All
>> > > > > the
>> > > > > > chunks must have been cleared
>> > > > > > [ERROR] Run 3:
>> > > > > > TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool.testLABChunkQueueWithMultipleMSLA
>> Bs:143
>> > > All
>> > > > > the
>> > > > > > chunks must have been cleared
>> > > > > > [ERROR] Run 4:
>> > > > > > TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool.testLABChunkQueueWithMultipleMSLA
>> Bs:143
>> > > All
>> > > > > the
>> > > > > > chunks must have been cleared
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 7:43 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > The second release candidate for HBase 2.0.0-beta-1 is up at:
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-2.0.0-
>> > > > beta-1-RC1/
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Maven artifacts are available from a staging directory here:
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>> > > > > orgapachehbase-1190
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > All was signed with my key at 8ACC93D2 [1]
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > I tagged the RC as 2.0.0-beta-1-RC1.5 (It took a few
>> attempts) at
>> > > > > > > hash 4c31374a90a487e19a6ef04d7b7adba43dd92ecf
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > This second RC has fix nice bug fixes over RC0 including fix
>> for
>> > > > > failing
>> > > > > > > and flakey tests.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > hbase-2.0.0-beta-1 is our first beta release. It includes all
>> > that
>> > > > was
>> > > > > in
>> > > > > > > previous alphas (new assignment manager, offheap read/write
>> path,
>> > > > > > in-memory
>> > > > > > > compactions, etc.). The APIs and feature-set are sealed.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > hbase-2.0.0-beta-1 is a not-for-production preview of
>> > hbase-2.0.0.
>> > > It
>> > > > > is
>> > > > > > > meant for devs and downstreamers to test drive and flag us if
>> we
>> > > > messed
>> > > > > > up
>> > > > > > > on anything ahead of our rolling GAs. We are particular
>> > interested
>> > > in
>> > > > > > > hearing from Coprocessor developers.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > The list of features addressed in 2.0.0 so far can be found
>> here
>> > > [3].
>> > > > > > There
>> > > > > > > are thousands. The list of ~2k+ fixes in 2.0.0 exclusively
>> can be
>> > > > found
>> > > > > > > here [4] (My JIRA JQL foo is a bit dodgy -- forgive me if
>> > > mistakes).
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > I've updated our overview doc. on the state of 2.0.0 [6].
>> We'll
>> > do
>> > > > one
>> > > > > > more
>> > > > > > > beta before we put up our first 2.0.0 Release Candidate by the
>> > end
>> > > of
>> > > > > > > January, 2.0.0-beta-2. Its focus will be making it so users
>> can
>> > do
>> > > a
>> > > > > > > rolling upgrade on to hbase-2.x from hbase-1.x (and any bug
>> fixes
>> > > > found
>> > > > > > > running beta-1). Here is the list of what we have targeted so
>> far
>> > > for
>> > > > > > > beta-2 [5]. Check it out.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > One known issue is that the User API has not been properly
>> > filtered
>> > > > so
>> > > > > it
>> > > > > > > shows more than just InterfaceAudience Public content
>> > (HBASE-19663,
>> > > > to
>> > > > > be
>> > > > > > > fixed by beta-2).
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Please take this beta for a spin. Please vote on whether it
>> ok to
>> > > put
>> > > > > out
>> > > > > > > this RC as our first beta (Note CHANGES has not yet been
>> > updated).
>> > > > Let
>> > > > > > the
>> > > > > > > VOTE be open for 72 hours (Wednesday evening)
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Thanks,
>> > > > > > > Your 2.0.0 Release Manager
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > 1. http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=
>> > 0x9816C7FC8ACC93D2
>> > > > > > > 3. https://goo.gl/scYjJr
>> > > > > > > 4. https://goo.gl/dFFT8b
>> > > > > > > 5. https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/HBASE/versions/
>> > 12340862
>> > > > > > > 6. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WCsVlnHjJeKUcl7wHwqb4
>> > > > > > > z9iEu_ktczrlKHK8N4SZzs/
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > --
>> > > > > > Best regards,
>> > > > > > Andrew
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from
>> > > truth's
>> > > > > > decrepit hands
>> > > > > > - A23, Crosstalk
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > --
>> > > > Best regards,
>> > > > Andrew
>> > > >
>> > > > Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from
>> truth's
>> > > > decrepit hands
>> > > > - A23, Crosstalk
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] The second hbase-2.0.0-beta-1 Release Candidate is
available for download
Posted by Jean-Marc Spaggiari <je...@spaggiari.org>.
Oh, you're right! I missed it! Ok. Thanks. Will wait for the next one.
JM
2018-01-10 5:00 GMT-05:00 Yu Li <ca...@gmail.com>:
> I believe this one is already sunk according to stack's reply:
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Stack <st...@duboce.net>
> Date: 10 January 2018 at 02:09
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] The second hbase-2.0.0-beta-1 Release Candidate is
> available for download
> To: HBase Dev List <de...@hbase.apache.org>
>
>
> Thanks Andrew.
>
> Let me work on this.
>
> RC is sunk. Will put up a new one after I address the above failure.
>
> Best Regards,
> Yu
>
> On 10 January 2018 at 17:54, Jean-Marc Spaggiari <je...@spaggiari.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Are we going to sink this one because of Andrew's -1?
> >
> > If so I will wait for the next one to test it...
> >
> > Le 10 janv. 2018 03 h 24, "Balazs Meszaros" <
> balazs.meszaros@cloudera.com>
> > a écrit :
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > - signatures, checksums OK,
> > > - unit tests passes (8u112),
> > > - shell works,
> > > - load test tool also successed.
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > > Balazs
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 10:38 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Linux here.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 1:13 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Andrew:
> > > > >
> > > > > I don't see this:
> > > > >
> > > > > [INFO] -------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > [INFO] T E S T S
> > > > > [INFO] -------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > [INFO] Running
> > > > > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool
> > > > > [INFO] Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time
> > elapsed:
> > > > > 4.409 s - in org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.
> > > > > TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool
> > > > > [INFO]
> > > > > [INFO] Results:
> > > > > [INFO]
> > > > > [INFO] Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
> > > > >
> > > > > Linux and Mac.
> > > > >
> > > > > What you reckon sir?
> > > > >
> > > > > St.Ack
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 10:03 AM, Andrew Purtell <
> apurtell@apache.org
> > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > -1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Checked sums and signatures: ok
> > > > > > RAT check passes: ok (8u144)
> > > > > > Built from source: ok (8u144)
> > > > > > Unit tests pass: failed (8u144), TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool
> always
> > > > fails
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool.org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.
> > > > > > TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool
> > > > > > can fail with OOME if not run in isolation.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If run in isolation, I get
> > > > > >
> > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool.
> > > > > > testLABChunkQueueWithMultipleMSLABs(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.
> > > > > regionserver.
> > > > > > TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool)
> > > > > > [ERROR] Run 1:
> > > > > > TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool.testLABChunkQueueWithMultipleM
> SLABs:143
> > > All
> > > > > the
> > > > > > chunks must have been cleared
> > > > > > [ERROR] Run 2:
> > > > > > TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool.testLABChunkQueueWithMultipleM
> SLABs:143
> > > All
> > > > > the
> > > > > > chunks must have been cleared
> > > > > > [ERROR] Run 3:
> > > > > > TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool.testLABChunkQueueWithMultipleM
> SLABs:143
> > > All
> > > > > the
> > > > > > chunks must have been cleared
> > > > > > [ERROR] Run 4:
> > > > > > TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool.testLABChunkQueueWithMultipleM
> SLABs:143
> > > All
> > > > > the
> > > > > > chunks must have been cleared
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 7:43 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > The second release candidate for HBase 2.0.0-beta-1 is up at:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-2.0.0-
> > > > beta-1-RC1/
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Maven artifacts are available from a staging directory here:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> > > > > orgapachehbase-1190
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > All was signed with my key at 8ACC93D2 [1]
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I tagged the RC as 2.0.0-beta-1-RC1.5 (It took a few attempts)
> at
> > > > > > > hash 4c31374a90a487e19a6ef04d7b7adba43dd92ecf
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > This second RC has fix nice bug fixes over RC0 including fix
> for
> > > > > failing
> > > > > > > and flakey tests.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > hbase-2.0.0-beta-1 is our first beta release. It includes all
> > that
> > > > was
> > > > > in
> > > > > > > previous alphas (new assignment manager, offheap read/write
> path,
> > > > > > in-memory
> > > > > > > compactions, etc.). The APIs and feature-set are sealed.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > hbase-2.0.0-beta-1 is a not-for-production preview of
> > hbase-2.0.0.
> > > It
> > > > > is
> > > > > > > meant for devs and downstreamers to test drive and flag us if
> we
> > > > messed
> > > > > > up
> > > > > > > on anything ahead of our rolling GAs. We are particular
> > interested
> > > in
> > > > > > > hearing from Coprocessor developers.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The list of features addressed in 2.0.0 so far can be found
> here
> > > [3].
> > > > > > There
> > > > > > > are thousands. The list of ~2k+ fixes in 2.0.0 exclusively can
> be
> > > > found
> > > > > > > here [4] (My JIRA JQL foo is a bit dodgy -- forgive me if
> > > mistakes).
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I've updated our overview doc. on the state of 2.0.0 [6]. We'll
> > do
> > > > one
> > > > > > more
> > > > > > > beta before we put up our first 2.0.0 Release Candidate by the
> > end
> > > of
> > > > > > > January, 2.0.0-beta-2. Its focus will be making it so users can
> > do
> > > a
> > > > > > > rolling upgrade on to hbase-2.x from hbase-1.x (and any bug
> fixes
> > > > found
> > > > > > > running beta-1). Here is the list of what we have targeted so
> far
> > > for
> > > > > > > beta-2 [5]. Check it out.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > One known issue is that the User API has not been properly
> > filtered
> > > > so
> > > > > it
> > > > > > > shows more than just InterfaceAudience Public content
> > (HBASE-19663,
> > > > to
> > > > > be
> > > > > > > fixed by beta-2).
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Please take this beta for a spin. Please vote on whether it ok
> to
> > > put
> > > > > out
> > > > > > > this RC as our first beta (Note CHANGES has not yet been
> > updated).
> > > > Let
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > VOTE be open for 72 hours (Wednesday evening)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > Your 2.0.0 Release Manager
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 1. http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=
> > 0x9816C7FC8ACC93D2
> > > > > > > 3. https://goo.gl/scYjJr
> > > > > > > 4. https://goo.gl/dFFT8b
> > > > > > > 5. https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/HBASE/versions/
> > 12340862
> > > > > > > 6. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WCsVlnHjJeKUcl7wHwqb4
> > > > > > > z9iEu_ktczrlKHK8N4SZzs/
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Best regards,
> > > > > > Andrew
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from
> > > truth's
> > > > > > decrepit hands
> > > > > > - A23, Crosstalk
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Best regards,
> > > > Andrew
> > > >
> > > > Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from
> truth's
> > > > decrepit hands
> > > > - A23, Crosstalk
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] The second hbase-2.0.0-beta-1 Release Candidate is
available for download
Posted by Yu Li <ca...@gmail.com>.
I believe this one is already sunk according to stack's reply:
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Stack <st...@duboce.net>
Date: 10 January 2018 at 02:09
Subject: Re: [VOTE] The second hbase-2.0.0-beta-1 Release Candidate is
available for download
To: HBase Dev List <de...@hbase.apache.org>
Thanks Andrew.
Let me work on this.
RC is sunk. Will put up a new one after I address the above failure.
Best Regards,
Yu
On 10 January 2018 at 17:54, Jean-Marc Spaggiari <je...@spaggiari.org>
wrote:
> Are we going to sink this one because of Andrew's -1?
>
> If so I will wait for the next one to test it...
>
> Le 10 janv. 2018 03 h 24, "Balazs Meszaros" <ba...@cloudera.com>
> a écrit :
>
> > +1
> >
> > - signatures, checksums OK,
> > - unit tests passes (8u112),
> > - shell works,
> > - load test tool also successed.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Balazs
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 10:38 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Linux here.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 1:13 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Andrew:
> > > >
> > > > I don't see this:
> > > >
> > > > [INFO] -------------------------------------------------------
> > > > [INFO] T E S T S
> > > > [INFO] -------------------------------------------------------
> > > > [INFO] Running
> > > > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool
> > > > [INFO] Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time
> elapsed:
> > > > 4.409 s - in org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.
> > > > TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool
> > > > [INFO]
> > > > [INFO] Results:
> > > > [INFO]
> > > > [INFO] Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
> > > >
> > > > Linux and Mac.
> > > >
> > > > What you reckon sir?
> > > >
> > > > St.Ack
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 10:03 AM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > -1
> > > > >
> > > > > Checked sums and signatures: ok
> > > > > RAT check passes: ok (8u144)
> > > > > Built from source: ok (8u144)
> > > > > Unit tests pass: failed (8u144), TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool always
> > > fails
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool.org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.
> > > > > TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool
> > > > > can fail with OOME if not run in isolation.
> > > > >
> > > > > If run in isolation, I get
> > > > >
> > > > > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool.
> > > > > testLABChunkQueueWithMultipleMSLABs(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.
> > > > regionserver.
> > > > > TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool)
> > > > > [ERROR] Run 1:
> > > > > TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool.testLABChunkQueueWithMultipleMSLABs:143
> > All
> > > > the
> > > > > chunks must have been cleared
> > > > > [ERROR] Run 2:
> > > > > TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool.testLABChunkQueueWithMultipleMSLABs:143
> > All
> > > > the
> > > > > chunks must have been cleared
> > > > > [ERROR] Run 3:
> > > > > TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool.testLABChunkQueueWithMultipleMSLABs:143
> > All
> > > > the
> > > > > chunks must have been cleared
> > > > > [ERROR] Run 4:
> > > > > TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool.testLABChunkQueueWithMultipleMSLABs:143
> > All
> > > > the
> > > > > chunks must have been cleared
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 7:43 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > The second release candidate for HBase 2.0.0-beta-1 is up at:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-2.0.0-
> > > beta-1-RC1/
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Maven artifacts are available from a staging directory here:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> > > > orgapachehbase-1190
> > > > > >
> > > > > > All was signed with my key at 8ACC93D2 [1]
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I tagged the RC as 2.0.0-beta-1-RC1.5 (It took a few attempts) at
> > > > > > hash 4c31374a90a487e19a6ef04d7b7adba43dd92ecf
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This second RC has fix nice bug fixes over RC0 including fix for
> > > > failing
> > > > > > and flakey tests.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > hbase-2.0.0-beta-1 is our first beta release. It includes all
> that
> > > was
> > > > in
> > > > > > previous alphas (new assignment manager, offheap read/write path,
> > > > > in-memory
> > > > > > compactions, etc.). The APIs and feature-set are sealed.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > hbase-2.0.0-beta-1 is a not-for-production preview of
> hbase-2.0.0.
> > It
> > > > is
> > > > > > meant for devs and downstreamers to test drive and flag us if we
> > > messed
> > > > > up
> > > > > > on anything ahead of our rolling GAs. We are particular
> interested
> > in
> > > > > > hearing from Coprocessor developers.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The list of features addressed in 2.0.0 so far can be found here
> > [3].
> > > > > There
> > > > > > are thousands. The list of ~2k+ fixes in 2.0.0 exclusively can be
> > > found
> > > > > > here [4] (My JIRA JQL foo is a bit dodgy -- forgive me if
> > mistakes).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I've updated our overview doc. on the state of 2.0.0 [6]. We'll
> do
> > > one
> > > > > more
> > > > > > beta before we put up our first 2.0.0 Release Candidate by the
> end
> > of
> > > > > > January, 2.0.0-beta-2. Its focus will be making it so users can
> do
> > a
> > > > > > rolling upgrade on to hbase-2.x from hbase-1.x (and any bug fixes
> > > found
> > > > > > running beta-1). Here is the list of what we have targeted so far
> > for
> > > > > > beta-2 [5]. Check it out.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > One known issue is that the User API has not been properly
> filtered
> > > so
> > > > it
> > > > > > shows more than just InterfaceAudience Public content
> (HBASE-19663,
> > > to
> > > > be
> > > > > > fixed by beta-2).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Please take this beta for a spin. Please vote on whether it ok to
> > put
> > > > out
> > > > > > this RC as our first beta (Note CHANGES has not yet been
> updated).
> > > Let
> > > > > the
> > > > > > VOTE be open for 72 hours (Wednesday evening)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Your 2.0.0 Release Manager
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 1. http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=
> 0x9816C7FC8ACC93D2
> > > > > > 3. https://goo.gl/scYjJr
> > > > > > 4. https://goo.gl/dFFT8b
> > > > > > 5. https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/HBASE/versions/
> 12340862
> > > > > > 6. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WCsVlnHjJeKUcl7wHwqb4
> > > > > > z9iEu_ktczrlKHK8N4SZzs/
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Best regards,
> > > > > Andrew
> > > > >
> > > > > Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from
> > truth's
> > > > > decrepit hands
> > > > > - A23, Crosstalk
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Best regards,
> > > Andrew
> > >
> > > Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from truth's
> > > decrepit hands
> > > - A23, Crosstalk
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] The second hbase-2.0.0-beta-1 Release Candidate is
available for download
Posted by Jean-Marc Spaggiari <je...@spaggiari.org>.
Are we going to sink this one because of Andrew's -1?
If so I will wait for the next one to test it...
Le 10 janv. 2018 03 h 24, "Balazs Meszaros" <ba...@cloudera.com>
a écrit :
> +1
>
> - signatures, checksums OK,
> - unit tests passes (8u112),
> - shell works,
> - load test tool also successed.
>
> Best regards,
> Balazs
>
> On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 10:38 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Linux here.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 1:13 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> >
> > > Andrew:
> > >
> > > I don't see this:
> > >
> > > [INFO] -------------------------------------------------------
> > > [INFO] T E S T S
> > > [INFO] -------------------------------------------------------
> > > [INFO] Running
> > > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool
> > > [INFO] Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed:
> > > 4.409 s - in org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.
> > > TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool
> > > [INFO]
> > > [INFO] Results:
> > > [INFO]
> > > [INFO] Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
> > >
> > > Linux and Mac.
> > >
> > > What you reckon sir?
> > >
> > > St.Ack
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 10:03 AM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > -1
> > > >
> > > > Checked sums and signatures: ok
> > > > RAT check passes: ok (8u144)
> > > > Built from source: ok (8u144)
> > > > Unit tests pass: failed (8u144), TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool always
> > fails
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool.org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.
> > > > TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool
> > > > can fail with OOME if not run in isolation.
> > > >
> > > > If run in isolation, I get
> > > >
> > > > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool.
> > > > testLABChunkQueueWithMultipleMSLABs(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.
> > > regionserver.
> > > > TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool)
> > > > [ERROR] Run 1:
> > > > TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool.testLABChunkQueueWithMultipleMSLABs:143
> All
> > > the
> > > > chunks must have been cleared
> > > > [ERROR] Run 2:
> > > > TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool.testLABChunkQueueWithMultipleMSLABs:143
> All
> > > the
> > > > chunks must have been cleared
> > > > [ERROR] Run 3:
> > > > TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool.testLABChunkQueueWithMultipleMSLABs:143
> All
> > > the
> > > > chunks must have been cleared
> > > > [ERROR] Run 4:
> > > > TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool.testLABChunkQueueWithMultipleMSLABs:143
> All
> > > the
> > > > chunks must have been cleared
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 7:43 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > The second release candidate for HBase 2.0.0-beta-1 is up at:
> > > > >
> > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-2.0.0-
> > beta-1-RC1/
> > > > >
> > > > > Maven artifacts are available from a staging directory here:
> > > > >
> > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> > > orgapachehbase-1190
> > > > >
> > > > > All was signed with my key at 8ACC93D2 [1]
> > > > >
> > > > > I tagged the RC as 2.0.0-beta-1-RC1.5 (It took a few attempts) at
> > > > > hash 4c31374a90a487e19a6ef04d7b7adba43dd92ecf
> > > > >
> > > > > This second RC has fix nice bug fixes over RC0 including fix for
> > > failing
> > > > > and flakey tests.
> > > > >
> > > > > hbase-2.0.0-beta-1 is our first beta release. It includes all that
> > was
> > > in
> > > > > previous alphas (new assignment manager, offheap read/write path,
> > > > in-memory
> > > > > compactions, etc.). The APIs and feature-set are sealed.
> > > > >
> > > > > hbase-2.0.0-beta-1 is a not-for-production preview of hbase-2.0.0.
> It
> > > is
> > > > > meant for devs and downstreamers to test drive and flag us if we
> > messed
> > > > up
> > > > > on anything ahead of our rolling GAs. We are particular interested
> in
> > > > > hearing from Coprocessor developers.
> > > > >
> > > > > The list of features addressed in 2.0.0 so far can be found here
> [3].
> > > > There
> > > > > are thousands. The list of ~2k+ fixes in 2.0.0 exclusively can be
> > found
> > > > > here [4] (My JIRA JQL foo is a bit dodgy -- forgive me if
> mistakes).
> > > > >
> > > > > I've updated our overview doc. on the state of 2.0.0 [6]. We'll do
> > one
> > > > more
> > > > > beta before we put up our first 2.0.0 Release Candidate by the end
> of
> > > > > January, 2.0.0-beta-2. Its focus will be making it so users can do
> a
> > > > > rolling upgrade on to hbase-2.x from hbase-1.x (and any bug fixes
> > found
> > > > > running beta-1). Here is the list of what we have targeted so far
> for
> > > > > beta-2 [5]. Check it out.
> > > > >
> > > > > One known issue is that the User API has not been properly filtered
> > so
> > > it
> > > > > shows more than just InterfaceAudience Public content (HBASE-19663,
> > to
> > > be
> > > > > fixed by beta-2).
> > > > >
> > > > > Please take this beta for a spin. Please vote on whether it ok to
> put
> > > out
> > > > > this RC as our first beta (Note CHANGES has not yet been updated).
> > Let
> > > > the
> > > > > VOTE be open for 72 hours (Wednesday evening)
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Your 2.0.0 Release Manager
> > > > >
> > > > > 1. http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x9816C7FC8ACC93D2
> > > > > 3. https://goo.gl/scYjJr
> > > > > 4. https://goo.gl/dFFT8b
> > > > > 5. https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/HBASE/versions/12340862
> > > > > 6. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WCsVlnHjJeKUcl7wHwqb4
> > > > > z9iEu_ktczrlKHK8N4SZzs/
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Best regards,
> > > > Andrew
> > > >
> > > > Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from
> truth's
> > > > decrepit hands
> > > > - A23, Crosstalk
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> > Andrew
> >
> > Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from truth's
> > decrepit hands
> > - A23, Crosstalk
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] The second hbase-2.0.0-beta-1 Release Candidate is
available for download
Posted by Balazs Meszaros <ba...@cloudera.com>.
+1
- signatures, checksums OK,
- unit tests passes (8u112),
- shell works,
- load test tool also successed.
Best regards,
Balazs
On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 10:38 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org> wrote:
> Linux here.
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 1:13 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>
> > Andrew:
> >
> > I don't see this:
> >
> > [INFO] -------------------------------------------------------
> > [INFO] T E S T S
> > [INFO] -------------------------------------------------------
> > [INFO] Running
> > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool
> > [INFO] Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed:
> > 4.409 s - in org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.
> > TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool
> > [INFO]
> > [INFO] Results:
> > [INFO]
> > [INFO] Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
> >
> > Linux and Mac.
> >
> > What you reckon sir?
> >
> > St.Ack
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 10:03 AM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > -1
> > >
> > > Checked sums and signatures: ok
> > > RAT check passes: ok (8u144)
> > > Built from source: ok (8u144)
> > > Unit tests pass: failed (8u144), TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool always
> fails
> > >
> > >
> > > TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool.org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.
> > > TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool
> > > can fail with OOME if not run in isolation.
> > >
> > > If run in isolation, I get
> > >
> > > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool.
> > > testLABChunkQueueWithMultipleMSLABs(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.
> > regionserver.
> > > TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool)
> > > [ERROR] Run 1:
> > > TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool.testLABChunkQueueWithMultipleMSLABs:143 All
> > the
> > > chunks must have been cleared
> > > [ERROR] Run 2:
> > > TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool.testLABChunkQueueWithMultipleMSLABs:143 All
> > the
> > > chunks must have been cleared
> > > [ERROR] Run 3:
> > > TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool.testLABChunkQueueWithMultipleMSLABs:143 All
> > the
> > > chunks must have been cleared
> > > [ERROR] Run 4:
> > > TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool.testLABChunkQueueWithMultipleMSLABs:143 All
> > the
> > > chunks must have been cleared
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 7:43 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > > The second release candidate for HBase 2.0.0-beta-1 is up at:
> > > >
> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-2.0.0-
> beta-1-RC1/
> > > >
> > > > Maven artifacts are available from a staging directory here:
> > > >
> > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> > orgapachehbase-1190
> > > >
> > > > All was signed with my key at 8ACC93D2 [1]
> > > >
> > > > I tagged the RC as 2.0.0-beta-1-RC1.5 (It took a few attempts) at
> > > > hash 4c31374a90a487e19a6ef04d7b7adba43dd92ecf
> > > >
> > > > This second RC has fix nice bug fixes over RC0 including fix for
> > failing
> > > > and flakey tests.
> > > >
> > > > hbase-2.0.0-beta-1 is our first beta release. It includes all that
> was
> > in
> > > > previous alphas (new assignment manager, offheap read/write path,
> > > in-memory
> > > > compactions, etc.). The APIs and feature-set are sealed.
> > > >
> > > > hbase-2.0.0-beta-1 is a not-for-production preview of hbase-2.0.0. It
> > is
> > > > meant for devs and downstreamers to test drive and flag us if we
> messed
> > > up
> > > > on anything ahead of our rolling GAs. We are particular interested in
> > > > hearing from Coprocessor developers.
> > > >
> > > > The list of features addressed in 2.0.0 so far can be found here [3].
> > > There
> > > > are thousands. The list of ~2k+ fixes in 2.0.0 exclusively can be
> found
> > > > here [4] (My JIRA JQL foo is a bit dodgy -- forgive me if mistakes).
> > > >
> > > > I've updated our overview doc. on the state of 2.0.0 [6]. We'll do
> one
> > > more
> > > > beta before we put up our first 2.0.0 Release Candidate by the end of
> > > > January, 2.0.0-beta-2. Its focus will be making it so users can do a
> > > > rolling upgrade on to hbase-2.x from hbase-1.x (and any bug fixes
> found
> > > > running beta-1). Here is the list of what we have targeted so far for
> > > > beta-2 [5]. Check it out.
> > > >
> > > > One known issue is that the User API has not been properly filtered
> so
> > it
> > > > shows more than just InterfaceAudience Public content (HBASE-19663,
> to
> > be
> > > > fixed by beta-2).
> > > >
> > > > Please take this beta for a spin. Please vote on whether it ok to put
> > out
> > > > this RC as our first beta (Note CHANGES has not yet been updated).
> Let
> > > the
> > > > VOTE be open for 72 hours (Wednesday evening)
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Your 2.0.0 Release Manager
> > > >
> > > > 1. http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x9816C7FC8ACC93D2
> > > > 3. https://goo.gl/scYjJr
> > > > 4. https://goo.gl/dFFT8b
> > > > 5. https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/HBASE/versions/12340862
> > > > 6. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WCsVlnHjJeKUcl7wHwqb4
> > > > z9iEu_ktczrlKHK8N4SZzs/
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Best regards,
> > > Andrew
> > >
> > > Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from truth's
> > > decrepit hands
> > > - A23, Crosstalk
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Andrew
>
> Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from truth's
> decrepit hands
> - A23, Crosstalk
>
Re: [VOTE] The second hbase-2.0.0-beta-1 Release Candidate is
available for download
Posted by Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>.
Linux here.
On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 1:13 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> Andrew:
>
> I don't see this:
>
> [INFO] -------------------------------------------------------
> [INFO] T E S T S
> [INFO] -------------------------------------------------------
> [INFO] Running
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool
> [INFO] Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed:
> 4.409 s - in org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.
> TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool
> [INFO]
> [INFO] Results:
> [INFO]
> [INFO] Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
>
> Linux and Mac.
>
> What you reckon sir?
>
> St.Ack
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 10:03 AM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > -1
> >
> > Checked sums and signatures: ok
> > RAT check passes: ok (8u144)
> > Built from source: ok (8u144)
> > Unit tests pass: failed (8u144), TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool always fails
> >
> >
> > TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool.org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.
> > TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool
> > can fail with OOME if not run in isolation.
> >
> > If run in isolation, I get
> >
> > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool.
> > testLABChunkQueueWithMultipleMSLABs(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.
> regionserver.
> > TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool)
> > [ERROR] Run 1:
> > TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool.testLABChunkQueueWithMultipleMSLABs:143 All
> the
> > chunks must have been cleared
> > [ERROR] Run 2:
> > TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool.testLABChunkQueueWithMultipleMSLABs:143 All
> the
> > chunks must have been cleared
> > [ERROR] Run 3:
> > TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool.testLABChunkQueueWithMultipleMSLABs:143 All
> the
> > chunks must have been cleared
> > [ERROR] Run 4:
> > TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool.testLABChunkQueueWithMultipleMSLABs:143 All
> the
> > chunks must have been cleared
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 7:43 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> >
> > > The second release candidate for HBase 2.0.0-beta-1 is up at:
> > >
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-2.0.0-beta-1-RC1/
> > >
> > > Maven artifacts are available from a staging directory here:
> > >
> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> orgapachehbase-1190
> > >
> > > All was signed with my key at 8ACC93D2 [1]
> > >
> > > I tagged the RC as 2.0.0-beta-1-RC1.5 (It took a few attempts) at
> > > hash 4c31374a90a487e19a6ef04d7b7adba43dd92ecf
> > >
> > > This second RC has fix nice bug fixes over RC0 including fix for
> failing
> > > and flakey tests.
> > >
> > > hbase-2.0.0-beta-1 is our first beta release. It includes all that was
> in
> > > previous alphas (new assignment manager, offheap read/write path,
> > in-memory
> > > compactions, etc.). The APIs and feature-set are sealed.
> > >
> > > hbase-2.0.0-beta-1 is a not-for-production preview of hbase-2.0.0. It
> is
> > > meant for devs and downstreamers to test drive and flag us if we messed
> > up
> > > on anything ahead of our rolling GAs. We are particular interested in
> > > hearing from Coprocessor developers.
> > >
> > > The list of features addressed in 2.0.0 so far can be found here [3].
> > There
> > > are thousands. The list of ~2k+ fixes in 2.0.0 exclusively can be found
> > > here [4] (My JIRA JQL foo is a bit dodgy -- forgive me if mistakes).
> > >
> > > I've updated our overview doc. on the state of 2.0.0 [6]. We'll do one
> > more
> > > beta before we put up our first 2.0.0 Release Candidate by the end of
> > > January, 2.0.0-beta-2. Its focus will be making it so users can do a
> > > rolling upgrade on to hbase-2.x from hbase-1.x (and any bug fixes found
> > > running beta-1). Here is the list of what we have targeted so far for
> > > beta-2 [5]. Check it out.
> > >
> > > One known issue is that the User API has not been properly filtered so
> it
> > > shows more than just InterfaceAudience Public content (HBASE-19663, to
> be
> > > fixed by beta-2).
> > >
> > > Please take this beta for a spin. Please vote on whether it ok to put
> out
> > > this RC as our first beta (Note CHANGES has not yet been updated). Let
> > the
> > > VOTE be open for 72 hours (Wednesday evening)
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Your 2.0.0 Release Manager
> > >
> > > 1. http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x9816C7FC8ACC93D2
> > > 3. https://goo.gl/scYjJr
> > > 4. https://goo.gl/dFFT8b
> > > 5. https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/HBASE/versions/12340862
> > > 6. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WCsVlnHjJeKUcl7wHwqb4
> > > z9iEu_ktczrlKHK8N4SZzs/
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> > Andrew
> >
> > Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from truth's
> > decrepit hands
> > - A23, Crosstalk
> >
>
--
Best regards,
Andrew
Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from truth's
decrepit hands
- A23, Crosstalk
Re: [VOTE] The second hbase-2.0.0-beta-1 Release Candidate is
available for download
Posted by Stack <st...@duboce.net>.
Andrew:
I don't see this:
[INFO] -------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] T E S T S
[INFO] -------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] Running
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool
[INFO] Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed:
4.409 s - in org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool
[INFO]
[INFO] Results:
[INFO]
[INFO] Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
Linux and Mac.
What you reckon sir?
St.Ack
On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 10:03 AM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org> wrote:
> -1
>
> Checked sums and signatures: ok
> RAT check passes: ok (8u144)
> Built from source: ok (8u144)
> Unit tests pass: failed (8u144), TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool always fails
>
>
> TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool.org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.
> TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool
> can fail with OOME if not run in isolation.
>
> If run in isolation, I get
>
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool.
> testLABChunkQueueWithMultipleMSLABs(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.
> TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool)
> [ERROR] Run 1:
> TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool.testLABChunkQueueWithMultipleMSLABs:143 All the
> chunks must have been cleared
> [ERROR] Run 2:
> TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool.testLABChunkQueueWithMultipleMSLABs:143 All the
> chunks must have been cleared
> [ERROR] Run 3:
> TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool.testLABChunkQueueWithMultipleMSLABs:143 All the
> chunks must have been cleared
> [ERROR] Run 4:
> TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool.testLABChunkQueueWithMultipleMSLABs:143 All the
> chunks must have been cleared
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 7:43 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>
> > The second release candidate for HBase 2.0.0-beta-1 is up at:
> >
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-2.0.0-beta-1-RC1/
> >
> > Maven artifacts are available from a staging directory here:
> >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1190
> >
> > All was signed with my key at 8ACC93D2 [1]
> >
> > I tagged the RC as 2.0.0-beta-1-RC1.5 (It took a few attempts) at
> > hash 4c31374a90a487e19a6ef04d7b7adba43dd92ecf
> >
> > This second RC has fix nice bug fixes over RC0 including fix for failing
> > and flakey tests.
> >
> > hbase-2.0.0-beta-1 is our first beta release. It includes all that was in
> > previous alphas (new assignment manager, offheap read/write path,
> in-memory
> > compactions, etc.). The APIs and feature-set are sealed.
> >
> > hbase-2.0.0-beta-1 is a not-for-production preview of hbase-2.0.0. It is
> > meant for devs and downstreamers to test drive and flag us if we messed
> up
> > on anything ahead of our rolling GAs. We are particular interested in
> > hearing from Coprocessor developers.
> >
> > The list of features addressed in 2.0.0 so far can be found here [3].
> There
> > are thousands. The list of ~2k+ fixes in 2.0.0 exclusively can be found
> > here [4] (My JIRA JQL foo is a bit dodgy -- forgive me if mistakes).
> >
> > I've updated our overview doc. on the state of 2.0.0 [6]. We'll do one
> more
> > beta before we put up our first 2.0.0 Release Candidate by the end of
> > January, 2.0.0-beta-2. Its focus will be making it so users can do a
> > rolling upgrade on to hbase-2.x from hbase-1.x (and any bug fixes found
> > running beta-1). Here is the list of what we have targeted so far for
> > beta-2 [5]. Check it out.
> >
> > One known issue is that the User API has not been properly filtered so it
> > shows more than just InterfaceAudience Public content (HBASE-19663, to be
> > fixed by beta-2).
> >
> > Please take this beta for a spin. Please vote on whether it ok to put out
> > this RC as our first beta (Note CHANGES has not yet been updated). Let
> the
> > VOTE be open for 72 hours (Wednesday evening)
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Your 2.0.0 Release Manager
> >
> > 1. http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x9816C7FC8ACC93D2
> > 3. https://goo.gl/scYjJr
> > 4. https://goo.gl/dFFT8b
> > 5. https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/HBASE/versions/12340862
> > 6. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WCsVlnHjJeKUcl7wHwqb4
> > z9iEu_ktczrlKHK8N4SZzs/
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Andrew
>
> Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from truth's
> decrepit hands
> - A23, Crosstalk
>
Re: [VOTE] The second hbase-2.0.0-beta-1 Release Candidate is
available for download
Posted by Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>.
-1
Checked sums and signatures: ok
RAT check passes: ok (8u144)
Built from source: ok (8u144)
Unit tests pass: failed (8u144), TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool always fails
TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool.org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool
can fail with OOME if not run in isolation.
If run in isolation, I get
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool.testLABChunkQueueWithMultipleMSLABs(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool)
[ERROR] Run 1:
TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool.testLABChunkQueueWithMultipleMSLABs:143 All the
chunks must have been cleared
[ERROR] Run 2:
TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool.testLABChunkQueueWithMultipleMSLABs:143 All the
chunks must have been cleared
[ERROR] Run 3:
TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool.testLABChunkQueueWithMultipleMSLABs:143 All the
chunks must have been cleared
[ERROR] Run 4:
TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool.testLABChunkQueueWithMultipleMSLABs:143 All the
chunks must have been cleared
On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 7:43 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> The second release candidate for HBase 2.0.0-beta-1 is up at:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-2.0.0-beta-1-RC1/
>
> Maven artifacts are available from a staging directory here:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1190
>
> All was signed with my key at 8ACC93D2 [1]
>
> I tagged the RC as 2.0.0-beta-1-RC1.5 (It took a few attempts) at
> hash 4c31374a90a487e19a6ef04d7b7adba43dd92ecf
>
> This second RC has fix nice bug fixes over RC0 including fix for failing
> and flakey tests.
>
> hbase-2.0.0-beta-1 is our first beta release. It includes all that was in
> previous alphas (new assignment manager, offheap read/write path, in-memory
> compactions, etc.). The APIs and feature-set are sealed.
>
> hbase-2.0.0-beta-1 is a not-for-production preview of hbase-2.0.0. It is
> meant for devs and downstreamers to test drive and flag us if we messed up
> on anything ahead of our rolling GAs. We are particular interested in
> hearing from Coprocessor developers.
>
> The list of features addressed in 2.0.0 so far can be found here [3]. There
> are thousands. The list of ~2k+ fixes in 2.0.0 exclusively can be found
> here [4] (My JIRA JQL foo is a bit dodgy -- forgive me if mistakes).
>
> I've updated our overview doc. on the state of 2.0.0 [6]. We'll do one more
> beta before we put up our first 2.0.0 Release Candidate by the end of
> January, 2.0.0-beta-2. Its focus will be making it so users can do a
> rolling upgrade on to hbase-2.x from hbase-1.x (and any bug fixes found
> running beta-1). Here is the list of what we have targeted so far for
> beta-2 [5]. Check it out.
>
> One known issue is that the User API has not been properly filtered so it
> shows more than just InterfaceAudience Public content (HBASE-19663, to be
> fixed by beta-2).
>
> Please take this beta for a spin. Please vote on whether it ok to put out
> this RC as our first beta (Note CHANGES has not yet been updated). Let the
> VOTE be open for 72 hours (Wednesday evening)
>
> Thanks,
> Your 2.0.0 Release Manager
>
> 1. http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x9816C7FC8ACC93D2
> 3. https://goo.gl/scYjJr
> 4. https://goo.gl/dFFT8b
> 5. https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/HBASE/versions/12340862
> 6. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WCsVlnHjJeKUcl7wHwqb4
> z9iEu_ktczrlKHK8N4SZzs/
>
--
Best regards,
Andrew
Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from truth's
decrepit hands
- A23, Crosstalk
Re: [VOTE] The second hbase-2.0.0-beta-1 Release Candidate is
available for download
Posted by Josh Elser <el...@apache.org>.
Just filed HBASE-19769 after Rajeshbabu and I did lots of digging. We
should probably fix before rolling an RC2, but I'm not sold on a clear
path to fix it. Feedback welcome up there, all.
On 1/8/18 10:43 PM, Stack wrote:
> The second release candidate for HBase 2.0.0-beta-1 is up at:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-2.0.0-beta-1-RC1/
>
> Maven artifacts are available from a staging directory here:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1190
>
> All was signed with my key at 8ACC93D2 [1]
>
> I tagged the RC as 2.0.0-beta-1-RC1.5 (It took a few attempts) at
> hash 4c31374a90a487e19a6ef04d7b7adba43dd92ecf
>
> This second RC has fix nice bug fixes over RC0 including fix for failing
> and flakey tests.
>
> hbase-2.0.0-beta-1 is our first beta release. It includes all that was in
> previous alphas (new assignment manager, offheap read/write path, in-memory
> compactions, etc.). The APIs and feature-set are sealed.
>
> hbase-2.0.0-beta-1 is a not-for-production preview of hbase-2.0.0. It is
> meant for devs and downstreamers to test drive and flag us if we messed up
> on anything ahead of our rolling GAs. We are particular interested in
> hearing from Coprocessor developers.
>
> The list of features addressed in 2.0.0 so far can be found here [3]. There
> are thousands. The list of ~2k+ fixes in 2.0.0 exclusively can be found
> here [4] (My JIRA JQL foo is a bit dodgy -- forgive me if mistakes).
>
> I've updated our overview doc. on the state of 2.0.0 [6]. We'll do one more
> beta before we put up our first 2.0.0 Release Candidate by the end of
> January, 2.0.0-beta-2. Its focus will be making it so users can do a
> rolling upgrade on to hbase-2.x from hbase-1.x (and any bug fixes found
> running beta-1). Here is the list of what we have targeted so far for
> beta-2 [5]. Check it out.
>
> One known issue is that the User API has not been properly filtered so it
> shows more than just InterfaceAudience Public content (HBASE-19663, to be
> fixed by beta-2).
>
> Please take this beta for a spin. Please vote on whether it ok to put out
> this RC as our first beta (Note CHANGES has not yet been updated). Let the
> VOTE be open for 72 hours (Wednesday evening)
>
> Thanks,
> Your 2.0.0 Release Manager
>
> 1. http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x9816C7FC8ACC93D2
> 3. https://goo.gl/scYjJr
> 4. https://goo.gl/dFFT8b
> 5. https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/HBASE/versions/12340862
> 6. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WCsVlnHjJeKUcl7wHwqb4
> z9iEu_ktczrlKHK8N4SZzs/
>