You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to adffaces-dev@incubator.apache.org by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> on 2007/02/13 11:45:50 UTC
[release] vote ??
Hi,
I was able to "prepare" the relase, based on the given feedback. Maven
created already a TAG for that (see [1]).
Should we vote on the tag (meaning source files) or on a binary artifact ?
I think here, in the Trinidad DEV list we should vote on the source files.
After that, when moving to general@i.a.o, we should as them for
approval, based on a binary release.
Thanks for any kind of feedback.
-Matthias
[1] http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/adffaces/tags/maven-plugin-parent-1.0.0-incubating/
--
Matthias Wessendorf
http://tinyurl.com/fmywh
further stuff:
blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
Re: [release] vote ??
Posted by Manfred Geiler <ma...@gmail.com>.
You are right. Did not know that release:perform does a new deploy. See [1].
--Manfred
[1] http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-release-plugin/examples/perform-release.html
On 2/13/07, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> I think the process here is a bit different than in a real Apache project.
> We need to get approval from Incubator PMC on binaries that are
> exactly the same that we put into a real m2-repo. A podling can't
> simply put together a release. it needs an approval on some binaries
> and when that approval is there, the release process is ended.
>
> Runing the release:perform after asking the incubator PMC would change this
>
> (IMO)
>
> -M
>
> On 2/13/07, Manfred Geiler <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > No.
> > "release:perform" ends the release process - after the vote!
> >
> > Just do a "mvn clean deploy -Psign-artifacts" (after you have checked
> > that distributionManagement points to the correct staging dir)
> >
> > --Manfred
> >
> >
> > On 2/13/07, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > so that means doing a "release:perform" to a staging repo (where ever that is)
> > > to continue ?
> > >
> > > -M
> > >
> > > On 2/13/07, Martin van den Bemt <ml...@mvdb.net> wrote:
> > > > We can do both, but I will focus on the binary..
> > > >
> > > > Mvgr,
> > > > Martin
> > > >
> > > > Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > I was able to "prepare" the relase, based on the given feedback. Maven
> > > > > created already a TAG for that (see [1]).
> > > > >
> > > > > Should we vote on the tag (meaning source files) or on a binary artifact ?
> > > > > I think here, in the Trinidad DEV list we should vote on the source files.
> > > > >
> > > > > After that, when moving to general@i.a.o, we should as them for
> > > > > approval, based on a binary release.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks for any kind of feedback.
> > > > >
> > > > > -Matthias
> > > > >
> > > > > [1]
> > > > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/adffaces/tags/maven-plugin-parent-1.0.0-incubating/
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > http://tinyurl.com/fmywh
> > >
> > > further stuff:
> > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
> http://tinyurl.com/fmywh
>
> further stuff:
> blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
>
Re: [release] vote ??
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
thanks for making it more clear,
so need now only to figure out, how to tell my friend maven that I
actually do -Dpassphrase :)))
thanks,
Matthias
On 2/13/07, Martin van den Bemt <ml...@mvdb.net> wrote:
> Btw this is not just an incubator requirement.. It's a requirement for all projects to vote on
> binaries.. Normally discussion about code is held in the "are we ready for release" vote, after that
> on binaries.
>
> Mvgr,
> Martin
>
> Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> > I think the process here is a bit different than in a real Apache project.
> > We need to get approval from Incubator PMC on binaries that are
> > exactly the same that we put into a real m2-repo. A podling can't
> > simply put together a release. it needs an approval on some binaries
> > and when that approval is there, the release process is ended.
> >
> > Runing the release:perform after asking the incubator PMC would change this
> >
> > (IMO)
> >
> > -M
> >
> > On 2/13/07, Manfred Geiler <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> No.
> >> "release:perform" ends the release process - after the vote!
> >>
> >> Just do a "mvn clean deploy -Psign-artifacts" (after you have checked
> >> that distributionManagement points to the correct staging dir)
> >>
> >> --Manfred
> >>
> >>
> >> On 2/13/07, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> >> > so that means doing a "release:perform" to a staging repo (where
> >> ever that is)
> >> > to continue ?
> >> >
> >> > -M
> >> >
> >> > On 2/13/07, Martin van den Bemt <ml...@mvdb.net> wrote:
> >> > > We can do both, but I will focus on the binary..
> >> > >
> >> > > Mvgr,
> >> > > Martin
> >> > >
> >> > > Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> >> > > > Hi,
> >> > > >
> >> > > > I was able to "prepare" the relase, based on the given feedback.
> >> Maven
> >> > > > created already a TAG for that (see [1]).
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Should we vote on the tag (meaning source files) or on a binary
> >> artifact ?
> >> > > > I think here, in the Trinidad DEV list we should vote on the
> >> source files.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > After that, when moving to general@i.a.o, we should as them for
> >> > > > approval, based on a binary release.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Thanks for any kind of feedback.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > -Matthias
> >> > > >
> >> > > > [1]
> >> > > >
> >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/adffaces/tags/maven-plugin-parent-1.0.0-incubating/
> >>
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Matthias Wessendorf
> >> > http://tinyurl.com/fmywh
> >> >
> >> > further stuff:
> >> > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> >> > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
http://tinyurl.com/fmywh
further stuff:
blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
Re: [release] vote ??
Posted by Martin van den Bemt <ml...@mvdb.net>.
Btw this is not just an incubator requirement.. It's a requirement for all projects to vote on
binaries.. Normally discussion about code is held in the "are we ready for release" vote, after that
on binaries.
Mvgr,
Martin
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> I think the process here is a bit different than in a real Apache project.
> We need to get approval from Incubator PMC on binaries that are
> exactly the same that we put into a real m2-repo. A podling can't
> simply put together a release. it needs an approval on some binaries
> and when that approval is there, the release process is ended.
>
> Runing the release:perform after asking the incubator PMC would change this
>
> (IMO)
>
> -M
>
> On 2/13/07, Manfred Geiler <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> No.
>> "release:perform" ends the release process - after the vote!
>>
>> Just do a "mvn clean deploy -Psign-artifacts" (after you have checked
>> that distributionManagement points to the correct staging dir)
>>
>> --Manfred
>>
>>
>> On 2/13/07, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
>> > so that means doing a "release:perform" to a staging repo (where
>> ever that is)
>> > to continue ?
>> >
>> > -M
>> >
>> > On 2/13/07, Martin van den Bemt <ml...@mvdb.net> wrote:
>> > > We can do both, but I will focus on the binary..
>> > >
>> > > Mvgr,
>> > > Martin
>> > >
>> > > Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>> > > > Hi,
>> > > >
>> > > > I was able to "prepare" the relase, based on the given feedback.
>> Maven
>> > > > created already a TAG for that (see [1]).
>> > > >
>> > > > Should we vote on the tag (meaning source files) or on a binary
>> artifact ?
>> > > > I think here, in the Trinidad DEV list we should vote on the
>> source files.
>> > > >
>> > > > After that, when moving to general@i.a.o, we should as them for
>> > > > approval, based on a binary release.
>> > > >
>> > > > Thanks for any kind of feedback.
>> > > >
>> > > > -Matthias
>> > > >
>> > > > [1]
>> > > >
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/adffaces/tags/maven-plugin-parent-1.0.0-incubating/
>>
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Matthias Wessendorf
>> > http://tinyurl.com/fmywh
>> >
>> > further stuff:
>> > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
>> > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
>> >
>>
>
>
Re: [release] vote ??
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
I think the process here is a bit different than in a real Apache project.
We need to get approval from Incubator PMC on binaries that are
exactly the same that we put into a real m2-repo. A podling can't
simply put together a release. it needs an approval on some binaries
and when that approval is there, the release process is ended.
Runing the release:perform after asking the incubator PMC would change this
(IMO)
-M
On 2/13/07, Manfred Geiler <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> No.
> "release:perform" ends the release process - after the vote!
>
> Just do a "mvn clean deploy -Psign-artifacts" (after you have checked
> that distributionManagement points to the correct staging dir)
>
> --Manfred
>
>
> On 2/13/07, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > so that means doing a "release:perform" to a staging repo (where ever that is)
> > to continue ?
> >
> > -M
> >
> > On 2/13/07, Martin van den Bemt <ml...@mvdb.net> wrote:
> > > We can do both, but I will focus on the binary..
> > >
> > > Mvgr,
> > > Martin
> > >
> > > Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I was able to "prepare" the relase, based on the given feedback. Maven
> > > > created already a TAG for that (see [1]).
> > > >
> > > > Should we vote on the tag (meaning source files) or on a binary artifact ?
> > > > I think here, in the Trinidad DEV list we should vote on the source files.
> > > >
> > > > After that, when moving to general@i.a.o, we should as them for
> > > > approval, based on a binary release.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for any kind of feedback.
> > > >
> > > > -Matthias
> > > >
> > > > [1]
> > > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/adffaces/tags/maven-plugin-parent-1.0.0-incubating/
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> > http://tinyurl.com/fmywh
> >
> > further stuff:
> > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> >
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
http://tinyurl.com/fmywh
further stuff:
blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
Re: [release] vote ??
Posted by Manfred Geiler <ma...@gmail.com>.
No.
"release:perform" ends the release process - after the vote!
Just do a "mvn clean deploy -Psign-artifacts" (after you have checked
that distributionManagement points to the correct staging dir)
--Manfred
On 2/13/07, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> so that means doing a "release:perform" to a staging repo (where ever that is)
> to continue ?
>
> -M
>
> On 2/13/07, Martin van den Bemt <ml...@mvdb.net> wrote:
> > We can do both, but I will focus on the binary..
> >
> > Mvgr,
> > Martin
> >
> > Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I was able to "prepare" the relase, based on the given feedback. Maven
> > > created already a TAG for that (see [1]).
> > >
> > > Should we vote on the tag (meaning source files) or on a binary artifact ?
> > > I think here, in the Trinidad DEV list we should vote on the source files.
> > >
> > > After that, when moving to general@i.a.o, we should as them for
> > > approval, based on a binary release.
> > >
> > > Thanks for any kind of feedback.
> > >
> > > -Matthias
> > >
> > > [1]
> > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/adffaces/tags/maven-plugin-parent-1.0.0-incubating/
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
> http://tinyurl.com/fmywh
>
> further stuff:
> blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
>
Re: [release] vote ??
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
so that means doing a "release:perform" to a staging repo (where ever that is)
to continue ?
-M
On 2/13/07, Martin van den Bemt <ml...@mvdb.net> wrote:
> We can do both, but I will focus on the binary..
>
> Mvgr,
> Martin
>
> Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I was able to "prepare" the relase, based on the given feedback. Maven
> > created already a TAG for that (see [1]).
> >
> > Should we vote on the tag (meaning source files) or on a binary artifact ?
> > I think here, in the Trinidad DEV list we should vote on the source files.
> >
> > After that, when moving to general@i.a.o, we should as them for
> > approval, based on a binary release.
> >
> > Thanks for any kind of feedback.
> >
> > -Matthias
> >
> > [1]
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/adffaces/tags/maven-plugin-parent-1.0.0-incubating/
> >
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
http://tinyurl.com/fmywh
further stuff:
blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
Re: [release] vote ??
Posted by Martin van den Bemt <ml...@mvdb.net>.
We can do both, but I will focus on the binary..
Mvgr,
Martin
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was able to "prepare" the relase, based on the given feedback. Maven
> created already a TAG for that (see [1]).
>
> Should we vote on the tag (meaning source files) or on a binary artifact ?
> I think here, in the Trinidad DEV list we should vote on the source files.
>
> After that, when moving to general@i.a.o, we should as them for
> approval, based on a binary release.
>
> Thanks for any kind of feedback.
>
> -Matthias
>
> [1]
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/adffaces/tags/maven-plugin-parent-1.0.0-incubating/
>
Re: [release] vote ??
Posted by Manfred Geiler <ma...@gmail.com>.
Yes, IMHO you should build and sign all the stuff, deploy it to a
temporary staging dir and start a vote on those artifacts.
Regards,
Manfred
On 2/13/07, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> ok, I think next step is doing a checkout on the tag (1.0.0-inc) and
> build the stuff and do the vote ...
>
> do you agree ?
>
> On 2/13/07, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I was able to "prepare" the relase, based on the given feedback. Maven
> > created already a TAG for that (see [1]).
> >
> > Should we vote on the tag (meaning source files) or on a binary artifact ?
> > I think here, in the Trinidad DEV list we should vote on the source files.
> >
> > After that, when moving to general@i.a.o, we should as them for
> > approval, based on a binary release.
> >
> > Thanks for any kind of feedback.
> >
> > -Matthias
> >
> > [1] http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/adffaces/tags/maven-plugin-parent-1.0.0-incubating/
> > --
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> > http://tinyurl.com/fmywh
> >
> > further stuff:
> > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> >
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
> http://tinyurl.com/fmywh
>
> further stuff:
> blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
>
Re: [release] vote ??
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
ok, I think next step is doing a checkout on the tag (1.0.0-inc) and
build the stuff and do the vote ...
do you agree ?
On 2/13/07, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was able to "prepare" the relase, based on the given feedback. Maven
> created already a TAG for that (see [1]).
>
> Should we vote on the tag (meaning source files) or on a binary artifact ?
> I think here, in the Trinidad DEV list we should vote on the source files.
>
> After that, when moving to general@i.a.o, we should as them for
> approval, based on a binary release.
>
> Thanks for any kind of feedback.
>
> -Matthias
>
> [1] http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/adffaces/tags/maven-plugin-parent-1.0.0-incubating/
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
> http://tinyurl.com/fmywh
>
> further stuff:
> blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
http://tinyurl.com/fmywh
further stuff:
blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com