You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to reviews@ambari.apache.org by Sandor Magyari <sm...@hortonworks.com> on 2016/11/30 17:07:43 UTC
Re: Review Request 53977: Ambari attempts to commit transactions
marked as rollback-only
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/53977/#review157422
-----------------------------------------------------------
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Sandor Magyari
On Nov. 29, 2016, 7:19 p.m., Attila Doroszlai wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/53977/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated Nov. 29, 2016, 7:19 p.m.)
>
>
> Review request for Ambari, Laszlo Puskas, Myroslav Papirkovskyy, Oliver Szabo, Sandor Magyari, Sebastian Toader, and Sid Wagle.
>
>
> Bugs: AMBARI-18956
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-18956
>
>
> Repository: ambari
>
>
> Description
> -------
>
> `EntityTransaction` may be marked [rollback-only](http://docs.oracle.com/javaee/6/api/javax/persistence/EntityTransaction.html#setRollbackOnly()) due to exception. If `@Transactional` is not marked to `rollbackOn` such exception, Ambari still attempts to commit the transaction. The end result for the transaction is the same (rollback), but instead of the original exception a `RollbackException` is reported, so information is lost.
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> ambari-server/src/main/java/org/apache/ambari/server/orm/AmbariJpaLocalTxnInterceptor.java d7ba463
> ambari-server/src/test/java/org/apache/ambari/server/orm/AmbariJpaLocalTxnInterceptorTest.java PRE-CREATION
>
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/53977/diff/
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
> * Added unit test
> * Tested on live cluster by triggering the downscale problem
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Attila Doroszlai
>
>