You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to c-dev@xerces.apache.org by "David G. Pickett (JIRA)" <xe...@xml.apache.org> on 2006/01/18 02:22:42 UTC
[jira] Created: (XERCESC-1552) Relative capability, language and
version number questions
Relative capability, language and version number questions
----------------------------------------------------------
Key: XERCESC-1552
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-1552
Project: Xerces-C++
Type: Improvement
Components: Miscellaneous
Versions: 2.7.0
Environment: Solaris
Reporter: David G. Pickett
Priority: Minor
We are planning to do a project using Xerces. It is a bit confusing that the level of support of XML Standards is hard to quantify. It feels like J2 is the real product, and C++ is chasing it but supports less. But then, the version numbers are just a minor point apart. Is this a red herring, or are the product actually verey comparable?
The reason for J1 was not obvious, is it there as more stable, or for legacy support, or are there other virtues to the low number?
It seems like the class names for similar putposes (I was looking at SAX*) do not match up, making use of the more prolific JAVA examples in C++ a bit challenging. Are the two products marching in different directions?
Is there a recommended, verified, minimum or maximum JRE/JDK version for the JAVA products, or does is the API somehow certified to work with every know version?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: c-dev-unsubscribe@xerces.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: c-dev-help@xerces.apache.org
[jira] Closed: (XERCESC-1552) Relative capability, language and
version number questions
Posted by "David Bertoni (JIRA)" <xe...@xml.apache.org>.
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-1552?page=all ]
David Bertoni closed XERCESC-1552:
----------------------------------
> Relative capability, language and version number questions
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: XERCESC-1552
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-1552
> Project: Xerces-C++
> Type: Improvement
> Components: Miscellaneous
> Versions: 2.7.0
> Environment: Solaris
> Reporter: David G. Pickett
> Priority: Minor
>
> We are planning to do a project using Xerces. It is a bit confusing that the level of support of XML Standards is hard to quantify. It feels like J2 is the real product, and C++ is chasing it but supports less. But then, the version numbers are just a minor point apart. Is this a red herring, or are the product actually verey comparable?
> The reason for J1 was not obvious, is it there as more stable, or for legacy support, or are there other virtues to the low number?
> It seems like the class names for similar putposes (I was looking at SAX*) do not match up, making use of the more prolific JAVA examples in C++ a bit challenging. Are the two products marching in different directions?
> Is there a recommended, verified, minimum or maximum JRE/JDK version for the JAVA products, or does is the API somehow certified to work with every know version?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: c-dev-unsubscribe@xerces.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: c-dev-help@xerces.apache.org
[jira] Resolved: (XERCESC-1552) Relative capability, language and
version number questions
Posted by "David Bertoni (JIRA)" <xe...@xml.apache.org>.
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-1552?page=all ]
David Bertoni resolved XERCESC-1552:
------------------------------------
Resolution: Invalid
> Relative capability, language and version number questions
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: XERCESC-1552
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-1552
> Project: Xerces-C++
> Type: Improvement
> Components: Miscellaneous
> Versions: 2.7.0
> Environment: Solaris
> Reporter: David G. Pickett
> Priority: Minor
>
> We are planning to do a project using Xerces. It is a bit confusing that the level of support of XML Standards is hard to quantify. It feels like J2 is the real product, and C++ is chasing it but supports less. But then, the version numbers are just a minor point apart. Is this a red herring, or are the product actually verey comparable?
> The reason for J1 was not obvious, is it there as more stable, or for legacy support, or are there other virtues to the low number?
> It seems like the class names for similar putposes (I was looking at SAX*) do not match up, making use of the more prolific JAVA examples in C++ a bit challenging. Are the two products marching in different directions?
> Is there a recommended, verified, minimum or maximum JRE/JDK version for the JAVA products, or does is the API somehow certified to work with every know version?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: c-dev-unsubscribe@xerces.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: c-dev-help@xerces.apache.org
[jira] Commented: (XERCESC-1552) Relative capability, language and
version number questions
Posted by "David Bertoni (JIRA)" <xe...@xml.apache.org>.
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-1552?page=comments#action_12363058 ]
David Bertoni commented on XERCESC-1552:
----------------------------------------
Please subscribe to the user list to ask questions, rather than opening defects.
> Relative capability, language and version number questions
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: XERCESC-1552
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-1552
> Project: Xerces-C++
> Type: Improvement
> Components: Miscellaneous
> Versions: 2.7.0
> Environment: Solaris
> Reporter: David G. Pickett
> Priority: Minor
>
> We are planning to do a project using Xerces. It is a bit confusing that the level of support of XML Standards is hard to quantify. It feels like J2 is the real product, and C++ is chasing it but supports less. But then, the version numbers are just a minor point apart. Is this a red herring, or are the product actually verey comparable?
> The reason for J1 was not obvious, is it there as more stable, or for legacy support, or are there other virtues to the low number?
> It seems like the class names for similar putposes (I was looking at SAX*) do not match up, making use of the more prolific JAVA examples in C++ a bit challenging. Are the two products marching in different directions?
> Is there a recommended, verified, minimum or maximum JRE/JDK version for the JAVA products, or does is the API somehow certified to work with every know version?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: c-dev-unsubscribe@xerces.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: c-dev-help@xerces.apache.org