You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by "Grant Ingersoll (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2008/04/24 02:57:21 UTC
[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1269) Analysers and Filters should not be
final
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12591893#action_12591893 ]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-1269:
-----------------------------------------
Can you submit a patch? I guess I don't see any reason they need to be final, but I am always paranoid that somebody had to have a reason at the time.
> Analysers and Filters should not be final
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-1269
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1269
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Analysis
> Affects Versions: 2.3.1
> Reporter: Cédrik LIME
> Priority: Minor
>
> I am trying to extend some Lucene Analysers to further improve their behaviour. However, some Analysers and Filters are final classes that I cannot extend (thus resorting to copying the class, which is less than optimal).
> Any reason we would want to inhibit people from extending a class like FrenchAnalyzer?
> Could me make all Analysers and Filters in the contrib-analysis package non-final?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org