You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@ignite.apache.org by "Pavel Tupitsyn (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2024/10/09 10:11:00 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-23322) Inconsistent method visibility in ClientSchema
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-23322?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17887873#comment-17887873 ]
Pavel Tupitsyn commented on IGNITE-23322:
-----------------------------------------
Merged to main: [3d08df33902b4d705bbcfc8512ee94a1b1007009|https://github.com/apache/ignite-3/commit/3d08df33902b4d705bbcfc8512ee94a1b1007009]
> Inconsistent method visibility in ClientSchema
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: IGNITE-23322
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-23322
> Project: Ignite
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: clients
> Affects Versions: 3.0.0-beta1
> Reporter: Tiago Marques Godinho
> Assignee: Tiago Marques Godinho
> Priority: Major
> Time Spent: 10m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> The `org.apache.ignite.internal.client.table.ClientSchema` class has some inconsistencies regarding method visibility that may hinder it's future usage:
> For instance:
> * ClientSchema#column is public, but ClientSchema#columnSafe is package-private.
> * ClientSchema#getMarshaller(Mapper) is public, but ClientSchema#getMarshaller(Mapper, Tuple) is package private; #getMarshaller(Mapper, TuplePart, allowUnmappedFields) is also package-private but we might want to hide the logic of allowing unmapped fields.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)