You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@ignite.apache.org by "Atri Sharma (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/06/03 07:42:49 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-979) Revisit timeout logic in Ignite.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14570306#comment-14570306 ]
Atri Sharma commented on IGNITE-979:
------------------------------------
For locks, can we have something like exponential backoff?
> Revisit timeout logic in Ignite.
> --------------------------------
>
> Key: IGNITE-979
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-979
> Project: Ignite
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: general
> Affects Versions: sprint-4
> Reporter: Vladimir Ozerov
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: sprint-6
>
>
> Migrated from GG private JIRA (GG-9487).
> "Also think of removing registration of events in timeout processor, but have several threads scanning the corresponding futures collection and cancel operations if necessary.
> List to check:
> - tasks
> - cache ops (atomic and tx modes):
> - get
> - put
> - query
> - lock
> - service deployment
> - continuos queries
> - message listeners deployment
> - ?"
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)