Re: [lang] Serialization subpackage?

[Stephen Colebourne <sc...@btopenworld.com>]

Does anyone else think that SerializationUtils should be in [io] ?

I think I'm happy with its location because its about using serialization
within a program rather than writing it out to a file.

Stephen

From: "Michael Davey" <Mi...@Sun.COM>
> Stephen Colebourne wrote:
>  >
>  > The Maven reports seem to suggest that SerailizationException is a
little
>  > odd in its current location. It means that the 'root' package depends
on a
>  > subpackage.
>  >
>  > Could we consider moving SerializationUtils and SerializationException
to a
>  > subpackage 'serializable' for 1.0? It would break people using the
beta, but
>  > its only marginal (and we've already done that in the exception
package).
>  >
>  > Its not a big issue, but I think it improves the structure overall.
>
> Stephen,
>
> I have two further suggestions.
>    o  Copy the classes in exception to 'root' and deprecate the originals
(and
> say that the 'exception' subpackage is deprecated), and
>    o  Copy SerializationUtils and SerializationException to o.a.c.io,
deprecate
> the originals and push for an early release of both io and lang.
>
> My 2p
> --
> Michael
>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>