You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@flume.apache.org by Hari Shreedharan <hs...@cloudera.com> on 2015/05/13 00:30:48 UTC
[DISCUSS] Drop Hadoop 1 support
Flume devs,
With Flume moving away from Java 6 in Flume 1.7, I would like to start a discussion on whether we should completely drop Hadoop-1 support. I am not sure we can even link against Hadoop-1 if we build with Java 7 as the minimum requirement. Even if we can, I think it might be a good idea to drop Hadoop 1 support at this point.
Comments?
Thanks,
Hari Shreedharan
Re: [DISCUSS] Drop Hadoop 1 support
Posted by Hari Shreedharan <hs...@cloudera.com>.
I don’t think that gives us any benefits. The reason dropping Hadoop-1 helps is that it greatly reduces the amount of reflection we use and can simplify quite a lot of our codebase. Remove hbase-94 does not give us any of those benefits - it will remove a profile from our pom, but we don’t really use that much in our official builds anyway.
Thanks,
Hari Shreedharan
> On May 13, 2015, at 5:26 PM, Johny Rufus <jr...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>
> +1 for dropping hadoop-1,
>
> Should we also consider dropping the hbase-94 compatible profile ?
>
> Thanks,
> Rufus
>
> On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 7:08 AM, <j....@accenture.com> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> ________________________________________________
>> Jean-François Guilmard
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Needham, Guy [mailto:Guy.Needham@virginmedia.co.uk]
>> Sent: mercredi 13 mai 2015 16:00
>> To: user@flume.apache.org; dev@flume.apache.org
>> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Drop Hadoop 1 support
>>
>> +1
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Guy Needham | Data Discovery
>> Virgin Media | Technology and Transformation | Data
>> Bartley Wood Business Park, Hook, Hampshire RG27 9UP D 01256 75 3362 I
>> welcome VSRE emails. Learn more at http://vsre.info/
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jarek Jarcec Cecho [mailto:jarcec@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Jarek
>> Jarcec Cecho
>> Sent: 13 May 2015 13:20
>> To: dev@flume.apache.org
>> Cc: user@flume.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Drop Hadoop 1 support
>>
>> +1
>>
>> I believe that dropping Hadoop 1 support is completely fair at this point.
>> Hadoop 2 is stable for a long time and offers much better capabilities.
>> People who remain on Hadoop 1 will still have ability to download older
>> Flume releases that are Hadoop 1 compatible.
>>
>> Jarcec
>>
>>> On May 13, 2015, at 5:39 AM, Hari Shreedharan <hs...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Adding user@
>>>
>>> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 5:56 PM, Ashish <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 (speaking as dev, it keeps life a bit simple)
>>>>
>>>> Would wait for the users to give +1's as they get directly affected
>>>> and possibly a few may have to upgrade Data Infrastructure.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 4:00 AM, Hari Shreedharan
>>>> <hs...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>>>>> Flume devs,
>>>>>
>>>>> With Flume moving away from Java 6 in Flume 1.7, I would like to
>>>>> start a
>>>> discussion on whether we should completely drop Hadoop-1 support. I
>>>> am not sure we can even link against Hadoop-1 if we build with Java 7
>>>> as the minimum requirement. Even if we can, I think it might be a
>>>> good idea to drop Hadoop 1 support at this point.
>>>>>
>>>>> Comments?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Hari Shreedharan
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> thanks
>>>> ashish
>>>>
>>>> Blog: http://www.ashishpaliwal.com/blog My Photo Galleries:
>>>> http://www.pbase.com/ashishpaliwal
>>>>
>>
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Save Paper - Do you really need to print this e-mail?
>>
>> Visit www.virginmedia.com for more information, and more fun.
>>
>> This email and any attachments are or may be confidential and legally
>> privileged and are sent solely for the attention of the addressee(s). If
>> you have received this email in error, please delete it from your system:
>> its use, disclosure or copying is unauthorised. Statements and opinions
>> expressed in this email may not represent those of Virgin Media. Any
>> representations or commitments in this email are subject to contract.
>>
>> Registered office: Media House, Bartley Wood Business Park, Hook,
>> Hampshire, RG27 9UP Registered in England and Wales with number 2591237
>>
>>
>> ________________________________
>>
>> This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain
>> privileged, proprietary, or otherwise confidential information. If you have
>> received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the
>> original. Any other use of the e-mail by you is prohibited. Where allowed
>> by local law, electronic communications with Accenture and its affiliates,
>> including e-mail and instant messaging (including content), may be scanned
>> by our systems for the purposes of information security and assessment of
>> internal compliance with Accenture policy.
>>
>> ______________________________________________________________________________________
>>
>> www.accenture.com
>>
Re: [DISCUSS] Drop Hadoop 1 support
Posted by Johny Rufus <jr...@cloudera.com>.
+1 for dropping hadoop-1,
Should we also consider dropping the hbase-94 compatible profile ?
Thanks,
Rufus
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 7:08 AM, <j....@accenture.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> ________________________________________________
> Jean-François Guilmard
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Needham, Guy [mailto:Guy.Needham@virginmedia.co.uk]
> Sent: mercredi 13 mai 2015 16:00
> To: user@flume.apache.org; dev@flume.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Drop Hadoop 1 support
>
> +1
>
> Regards,
>
> Guy Needham | Data Discovery
> Virgin Media | Technology and Transformation | Data
> Bartley Wood Business Park, Hook, Hampshire RG27 9UP D 01256 75 3362 I
> welcome VSRE emails. Learn more at http://vsre.info/
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jarek Jarcec Cecho [mailto:jarcec@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Jarek
> Jarcec Cecho
> Sent: 13 May 2015 13:20
> To: dev@flume.apache.org
> Cc: user@flume.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Drop Hadoop 1 support
>
> +1
>
> I believe that dropping Hadoop 1 support is completely fair at this point.
> Hadoop 2 is stable for a long time and offers much better capabilities.
> People who remain on Hadoop 1 will still have ability to download older
> Flume releases that are Hadoop 1 compatible.
>
> Jarcec
>
> > On May 13, 2015, at 5:39 AM, Hari Shreedharan <hs...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > Adding user@
> >
> > On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 5:56 PM, Ashish <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> +1 (speaking as dev, it keeps life a bit simple)
> >>
> >> Would wait for the users to give +1's as they get directly affected
> >> and possibly a few may have to upgrade Data Infrastructure.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 4:00 AM, Hari Shreedharan
> >> <hs...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> >>> Flume devs,
> >>>
> >>> With Flume moving away from Java 6 in Flume 1.7, I would like to
> >>> start a
> >> discussion on whether we should completely drop Hadoop-1 support. I
> >> am not sure we can even link against Hadoop-1 if we build with Java 7
> >> as the minimum requirement. Even if we can, I think it might be a
> >> good idea to drop Hadoop 1 support at this point.
> >>>
> >>> Comments?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Hari Shreedharan
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> thanks
> >> ashish
> >>
> >> Blog: http://www.ashishpaliwal.com/blog My Photo Galleries:
> >> http://www.pbase.com/ashishpaliwal
> >>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> Save Paper - Do you really need to print this e-mail?
>
> Visit www.virginmedia.com for more information, and more fun.
>
> This email and any attachments are or may be confidential and legally
> privileged and are sent solely for the attention of the addressee(s). If
> you have received this email in error, please delete it from your system:
> its use, disclosure or copying is unauthorised. Statements and opinions
> expressed in this email may not represent those of Virgin Media. Any
> representations or commitments in this email are subject to contract.
>
> Registered office: Media House, Bartley Wood Business Park, Hook,
> Hampshire, RG27 9UP Registered in England and Wales with number 2591237
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain
> privileged, proprietary, or otherwise confidential information. If you have
> received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the
> original. Any other use of the e-mail by you is prohibited. Where allowed
> by local law, electronic communications with Accenture and its affiliates,
> including e-mail and instant messaging (including content), may be scanned
> by our systems for the purposes of information security and assessment of
> internal compliance with Accenture policy.
>
> ______________________________________________________________________________________
>
> www.accenture.com
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Drop Hadoop 1 support
Posted by Johny Rufus <jr...@cloudera.com>.
+1 for dropping hadoop-1,
Should we also consider dropping the hbase-94 compatible profile ?
Thanks,
Rufus
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 7:08 AM, <j....@accenture.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> ________________________________________________
> Jean-François Guilmard
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Needham, Guy [mailto:Guy.Needham@virginmedia.co.uk]
> Sent: mercredi 13 mai 2015 16:00
> To: user@flume.apache.org; dev@flume.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Drop Hadoop 1 support
>
> +1
>
> Regards,
>
> Guy Needham | Data Discovery
> Virgin Media | Technology and Transformation | Data
> Bartley Wood Business Park, Hook, Hampshire RG27 9UP D 01256 75 3362 I
> welcome VSRE emails. Learn more at http://vsre.info/
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jarek Jarcec Cecho [mailto:jarcec@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Jarek
> Jarcec Cecho
> Sent: 13 May 2015 13:20
> To: dev@flume.apache.org
> Cc: user@flume.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Drop Hadoop 1 support
>
> +1
>
> I believe that dropping Hadoop 1 support is completely fair at this point.
> Hadoop 2 is stable for a long time and offers much better capabilities.
> People who remain on Hadoop 1 will still have ability to download older
> Flume releases that are Hadoop 1 compatible.
>
> Jarcec
>
> > On May 13, 2015, at 5:39 AM, Hari Shreedharan <hs...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > Adding user@
> >
> > On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 5:56 PM, Ashish <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> +1 (speaking as dev, it keeps life a bit simple)
> >>
> >> Would wait for the users to give +1's as they get directly affected
> >> and possibly a few may have to upgrade Data Infrastructure.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 4:00 AM, Hari Shreedharan
> >> <hs...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> >>> Flume devs,
> >>>
> >>> With Flume moving away from Java 6 in Flume 1.7, I would like to
> >>> start a
> >> discussion on whether we should completely drop Hadoop-1 support. I
> >> am not sure we can even link against Hadoop-1 if we build with Java 7
> >> as the minimum requirement. Even if we can, I think it might be a
> >> good idea to drop Hadoop 1 support at this point.
> >>>
> >>> Comments?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Hari Shreedharan
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> thanks
> >> ashish
> >>
> >> Blog: http://www.ashishpaliwal.com/blog My Photo Galleries:
> >> http://www.pbase.com/ashishpaliwal
> >>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> Save Paper - Do you really need to print this e-mail?
>
> Visit www.virginmedia.com for more information, and more fun.
>
> This email and any attachments are or may be confidential and legally
> privileged and are sent solely for the attention of the addressee(s). If
> you have received this email in error, please delete it from your system:
> its use, disclosure or copying is unauthorised. Statements and opinions
> expressed in this email may not represent those of Virgin Media. Any
> representations or commitments in this email are subject to contract.
>
> Registered office: Media House, Bartley Wood Business Park, Hook,
> Hampshire, RG27 9UP Registered in England and Wales with number 2591237
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain
> privileged, proprietary, or otherwise confidential information. If you have
> received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the
> original. Any other use of the e-mail by you is prohibited. Where allowed
> by local law, electronic communications with Accenture and its affiliates,
> including e-mail and instant messaging (including content), may be scanned
> by our systems for the purposes of information security and assessment of
> internal compliance with Accenture policy.
>
> ______________________________________________________________________________________
>
> www.accenture.com
>
RE: [DISCUSS] Drop Hadoop 1 support
Posted by j....@accenture.com.
+1
________________________________________________
Jean-François Guilmard
-----Original Message-----
From: Needham, Guy [mailto:Guy.Needham@virginmedia.co.uk]
Sent: mercredi 13 mai 2015 16:00
To: user@flume.apache.org; dev@flume.apache.org
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Drop Hadoop 1 support
+1
Regards,
Guy Needham | Data Discovery
Virgin Media | Technology and Transformation | Data
Bartley Wood Business Park, Hook, Hampshire RG27 9UP D 01256 75 3362 I welcome VSRE emails. Learn more at http://vsre.info/
-----Original Message-----
From: Jarek Jarcec Cecho [mailto:jarcec@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Jarek Jarcec Cecho
Sent: 13 May 2015 13:20
To: dev@flume.apache.org
Cc: user@flume.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Drop Hadoop 1 support
+1
I believe that dropping Hadoop 1 support is completely fair at this point. Hadoop 2 is stable for a long time and offers much better capabilities. People who remain on Hadoop 1 will still have ability to download older Flume releases that are Hadoop 1 compatible.
Jarcec
> On May 13, 2015, at 5:39 AM, Hari Shreedharan <hs...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Adding user@
>
> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 5:56 PM, Ashish <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +1 (speaking as dev, it keeps life a bit simple)
>>
>> Would wait for the users to give +1's as they get directly affected
>> and possibly a few may have to upgrade Data Infrastructure.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 4:00 AM, Hari Shreedharan
>> <hs...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>>> Flume devs,
>>>
>>> With Flume moving away from Java 6 in Flume 1.7, I would like to
>>> start a
>> discussion on whether we should completely drop Hadoop-1 support. I
>> am not sure we can even link against Hadoop-1 if we build with Java 7
>> as the minimum requirement. Even if we can, I think it might be a
>> good idea to drop Hadoop 1 support at this point.
>>>
>>> Comments?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Hari Shreedharan
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> thanks
>> ashish
>>
>> Blog: http://www.ashishpaliwal.com/blog My Photo Galleries:
>> http://www.pbase.com/ashishpaliwal
>>
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Save Paper - Do you really need to print this e-mail?
Visit www.virginmedia.com for more information, and more fun.
This email and any attachments are or may be confidential and legally privileged and are sent solely for the attention of the addressee(s). If you have received this email in error, please delete it from your system: its use, disclosure or copying is unauthorised. Statements and opinions expressed in this email may not represent those of Virgin Media. Any representations or commitments in this email are subject to contract.
Registered office: Media House, Bartley Wood Business Park, Hook, Hampshire, RG27 9UP Registered in England and Wales with number 2591237
________________________________
This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise confidential information. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any other use of the e-mail by you is prohibited. Where allowed by local law, electronic communications with Accenture and its affiliates, including e-mail and instant messaging (including content), may be scanned by our systems for the purposes of information security and assessment of internal compliance with Accenture policy.
______________________________________________________________________________________
www.accenture.com
RE: [DISCUSS] Drop Hadoop 1 support
Posted by j....@accenture.com.
+1
________________________________________________
Jean-François Guilmard
-----Original Message-----
From: Needham, Guy [mailto:Guy.Needham@virginmedia.co.uk]
Sent: mercredi 13 mai 2015 16:00
To: user@flume.apache.org; dev@flume.apache.org
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Drop Hadoop 1 support
+1
Regards,
Guy Needham | Data Discovery
Virgin Media | Technology and Transformation | Data
Bartley Wood Business Park, Hook, Hampshire RG27 9UP D 01256 75 3362 I welcome VSRE emails. Learn more at http://vsre.info/
-----Original Message-----
From: Jarek Jarcec Cecho [mailto:jarcec@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Jarek Jarcec Cecho
Sent: 13 May 2015 13:20
To: dev@flume.apache.org
Cc: user@flume.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Drop Hadoop 1 support
+1
I believe that dropping Hadoop 1 support is completely fair at this point. Hadoop 2 is stable for a long time and offers much better capabilities. People who remain on Hadoop 1 will still have ability to download older Flume releases that are Hadoop 1 compatible.
Jarcec
> On May 13, 2015, at 5:39 AM, Hari Shreedharan <hs...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Adding user@
>
> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 5:56 PM, Ashish <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +1 (speaking as dev, it keeps life a bit simple)
>>
>> Would wait for the users to give +1's as they get directly affected
>> and possibly a few may have to upgrade Data Infrastructure.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 4:00 AM, Hari Shreedharan
>> <hs...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>>> Flume devs,
>>>
>>> With Flume moving away from Java 6 in Flume 1.7, I would like to
>>> start a
>> discussion on whether we should completely drop Hadoop-1 support. I
>> am not sure we can even link against Hadoop-1 if we build with Java 7
>> as the minimum requirement. Even if we can, I think it might be a
>> good idea to drop Hadoop 1 support at this point.
>>>
>>> Comments?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Hari Shreedharan
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> thanks
>> ashish
>>
>> Blog: http://www.ashishpaliwal.com/blog My Photo Galleries:
>> http://www.pbase.com/ashishpaliwal
>>
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Save Paper - Do you really need to print this e-mail?
Visit www.virginmedia.com for more information, and more fun.
This email and any attachments are or may be confidential and legally privileged and are sent solely for the attention of the addressee(s). If you have received this email in error, please delete it from your system: its use, disclosure or copying is unauthorised. Statements and opinions expressed in this email may not represent those of Virgin Media. Any representations or commitments in this email are subject to contract.
Registered office: Media House, Bartley Wood Business Park, Hook, Hampshire, RG27 9UP Registered in England and Wales with number 2591237
________________________________
This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise confidential information. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any other use of the e-mail by you is prohibited. Where allowed by local law, electronic communications with Accenture and its affiliates, including e-mail and instant messaging (including content), may be scanned by our systems for the purposes of information security and assessment of internal compliance with Accenture policy.
______________________________________________________________________________________
www.accenture.com
RE: [DISCUSS] Drop Hadoop 1 support
Posted by "Needham, Guy" <Gu...@virginmedia.co.uk>.
+1
Regards,
Guy Needham | Data Discovery
Virgin Media | Technology and Transformation | Data
Bartley Wood Business Park, Hook, Hampshire RG27 9UP
D 01256 75 3362
I welcome VSRE emails. Learn more at http://vsre.info/
-----Original Message-----
From: Jarek Jarcec Cecho [mailto:jarcec@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Jarek Jarcec Cecho
Sent: 13 May 2015 13:20
To: dev@flume.apache.org
Cc: user@flume.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Drop Hadoop 1 support
+1
I believe that dropping Hadoop 1 support is completely fair at this point. Hadoop 2 is stable for a long time and offers much better capabilities. People who remain on Hadoop 1 will still have ability to download older Flume releases that are Hadoop 1 compatible.
Jarcec
> On May 13, 2015, at 5:39 AM, Hari Shreedharan <hs...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Adding user@
>
> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 5:56 PM, Ashish <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +1 (speaking as dev, it keeps life a bit simple)
>>
>> Would wait for the users to give +1's as they get directly affected
>> and possibly a few may have to upgrade Data Infrastructure.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 4:00 AM, Hari Shreedharan
>> <hs...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>>> Flume devs,
>>>
>>> With Flume moving away from Java 6 in Flume 1.7, I would like to
>>> start a
>> discussion on whether we should completely drop Hadoop-1 support. I
>> am not sure we can even link against Hadoop-1 if we build with Java 7
>> as the minimum requirement. Even if we can, I think it might be a
>> good idea to drop Hadoop 1 support at this point.
>>>
>>> Comments?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Hari Shreedharan
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> thanks
>> ashish
>>
>> Blog: http://www.ashishpaliwal.com/blog My Photo Galleries:
>> http://www.pbase.com/ashishpaliwal
>>
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Save Paper - Do you really need to print this e-mail?
Visit www.virginmedia.com for more information, and more fun.
This email and any attachments are or may be confidential and legally privileged
and are sent solely for the attention of the addressee(s). If you have received this
email in error, please delete it from your system: its use, disclosure or copying is
unauthorised. Statements and opinions expressed in this email may not represent
those of Virgin Media. Any representations or commitments in this email are
subject to contract.
Registered office: Media House, Bartley Wood Business Park, Hook, Hampshire, RG27 9UP
Registered in England and Wales with number 2591237
Re: [DISCUSS] Drop Hadoop 1 support
Posted by Jarek Jarcec Cecho <ja...@apache.org>.
+1
I believe that dropping Hadoop 1 support is completely fair at this point. Hadoop 2 is stable for a long time and offers much better capabilities. People who remain on Hadoop 1 will still have ability to download older Flume releases that are Hadoop 1 compatible.
Jarcec
> On May 13, 2015, at 5:39 AM, Hari Shreedharan <hs...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Adding user@
>
> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 5:56 PM, Ashish <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +1 (speaking as dev, it keeps life a bit simple)
>>
>> Would wait for the users to give +1's as they get directly affected
>> and possibly a few may have to upgrade Data Infrastructure.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 4:00 AM, Hari Shreedharan
>> <hs...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>>> Flume devs,
>>>
>>> With Flume moving away from Java 6 in Flume 1.7, I would like to start a
>> discussion on whether we should completely drop Hadoop-1 support. I am not
>> sure we can even link against Hadoop-1 if we build with Java 7 as the
>> minimum requirement. Even if we can, I think it might be a good idea to
>> drop Hadoop 1 support at this point.
>>>
>>> Comments?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Hari Shreedharan
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> thanks
>> ashish
>>
>> Blog: http://www.ashishpaliwal.com/blog
>> My Photo Galleries: http://www.pbase.com/ashishpaliwal
>>
Re: [DISCUSS] Drop Hadoop 1 support
Posted by Jarek Jarcec Cecho <ja...@apache.org>.
+1
I believe that dropping Hadoop 1 support is completely fair at this point. Hadoop 2 is stable for a long time and offers much better capabilities. People who remain on Hadoop 1 will still have ability to download older Flume releases that are Hadoop 1 compatible.
Jarcec
> On May 13, 2015, at 5:39 AM, Hari Shreedharan <hs...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Adding user@
>
> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 5:56 PM, Ashish <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +1 (speaking as dev, it keeps life a bit simple)
>>
>> Would wait for the users to give +1's as they get directly affected
>> and possibly a few may have to upgrade Data Infrastructure.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 4:00 AM, Hari Shreedharan
>> <hs...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>>> Flume devs,
>>>
>>> With Flume moving away from Java 6 in Flume 1.7, I would like to start a
>> discussion on whether we should completely drop Hadoop-1 support. I am not
>> sure we can even link against Hadoop-1 if we build with Java 7 as the
>> minimum requirement. Even if we can, I think it might be a good idea to
>> drop Hadoop 1 support at this point.
>>>
>>> Comments?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Hari Shreedharan
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> thanks
>> ashish
>>
>> Blog: http://www.ashishpaliwal.com/blog
>> My Photo Galleries: http://www.pbase.com/ashishpaliwal
>>
Re: [DISCUSS] Drop Hadoop 1 support
Posted by Santiago Mola <sm...@stratio.com>.
+1
It's time to move on. Trying to support hadoop-1 is also a dependency hell
for plugins.
2015-05-13 5:39 GMT+02:00 Hari Shreedharan <hs...@apache.org>:
> Adding user@
>
> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 5:56 PM, Ashish <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +1 (speaking as dev, it keeps life a bit simple)
>>
>> Would wait for the users to give +1's as they get directly affected
>> and possibly a few may have to upgrade Data Infrastructure.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 4:00 AM, Hari Shreedharan
>> <hs...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>> > Flume devs,
>> >
>> > With Flume moving away from Java 6 in Flume 1.7, I would like to start
>> a discussion on whether we should completely drop Hadoop-1 support. I am
>> not sure we can even link against Hadoop-1 if we build with Java 7 as the
>> minimum requirement. Even if we can, I think it might be a good idea to
>> drop Hadoop 1 support at this point.
>> >
>> > Comments?
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Hari Shreedharan
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> thanks
>> ashish
>>
>> Blog: http://www.ashishpaliwal.com/blog
>> My Photo Galleries: http://www.pbase.com/ashishpaliwal
>>
>
>
--
Santiago M. Mola
<http://www.stratio.com/>
Vía de las dos Castillas, 33, Ática 4, 3ª Planta
28224 Pozuelo de Alarcón, Madrid
Tel: +34 91 828 6473 // www.stratio.com // *@stratiobd
<https://twitter.com/StratioBD>*
Re: [DISCUSS] Drop Hadoop 1 support
Posted by Santiago Mola <sm...@stratio.com>.
+1
It's time to move on. Trying to support hadoop-1 is also a dependency hell
for plugins.
2015-05-13 5:39 GMT+02:00 Hari Shreedharan <hs...@apache.org>:
> Adding user@
>
> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 5:56 PM, Ashish <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +1 (speaking as dev, it keeps life a bit simple)
>>
>> Would wait for the users to give +1's as they get directly affected
>> and possibly a few may have to upgrade Data Infrastructure.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 4:00 AM, Hari Shreedharan
>> <hs...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>> > Flume devs,
>> >
>> > With Flume moving away from Java 6 in Flume 1.7, I would like to start
>> a discussion on whether we should completely drop Hadoop-1 support. I am
>> not sure we can even link against Hadoop-1 if we build with Java 7 as the
>> minimum requirement. Even if we can, I think it might be a good idea to
>> drop Hadoop 1 support at this point.
>> >
>> > Comments?
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Hari Shreedharan
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> thanks
>> ashish
>>
>> Blog: http://www.ashishpaliwal.com/blog
>> My Photo Galleries: http://www.pbase.com/ashishpaliwal
>>
>
>
--
Santiago M. Mola
<http://www.stratio.com/>
Vía de las dos Castillas, 33, Ática 4, 3ª Planta
28224 Pozuelo de Alarcón, Madrid
Tel: +34 91 828 6473 // www.stratio.com // *@stratiobd
<https://twitter.com/StratioBD>*
Re: [DISCUSS] Drop Hadoop 1 support
Posted by Hari Shreedharan <hs...@apache.org>.
Adding user@
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 5:56 PM, Ashish <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 (speaking as dev, it keeps life a bit simple)
>
> Would wait for the users to give +1's as they get directly affected
> and possibly a few may have to upgrade Data Infrastructure.
>
>
> On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 4:00 AM, Hari Shreedharan
> <hs...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> > Flume devs,
> >
> > With Flume moving away from Java 6 in Flume 1.7, I would like to start a
> discussion on whether we should completely drop Hadoop-1 support. I am not
> sure we can even link against Hadoop-1 if we build with Java 7 as the
> minimum requirement. Even if we can, I think it might be a good idea to
> drop Hadoop 1 support at this point.
> >
> > Comments?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Hari Shreedharan
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> thanks
> ashish
>
> Blog: http://www.ashishpaliwal.com/blog
> My Photo Galleries: http://www.pbase.com/ashishpaliwal
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Drop Hadoop 1 support
Posted by Hari Shreedharan <hs...@apache.org>.
Adding user@
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 5:56 PM, Ashish <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 (speaking as dev, it keeps life a bit simple)
>
> Would wait for the users to give +1's as they get directly affected
> and possibly a few may have to upgrade Data Infrastructure.
>
>
> On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 4:00 AM, Hari Shreedharan
> <hs...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> > Flume devs,
> >
> > With Flume moving away from Java 6 in Flume 1.7, I would like to start a
> discussion on whether we should completely drop Hadoop-1 support. I am not
> sure we can even link against Hadoop-1 if we build with Java 7 as the
> minimum requirement. Even if we can, I think it might be a good idea to
> drop Hadoop 1 support at this point.
> >
> > Comments?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Hari Shreedharan
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> thanks
> ashish
>
> Blog: http://www.ashishpaliwal.com/blog
> My Photo Galleries: http://www.pbase.com/ashishpaliwal
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Drop Hadoop 1 support
Posted by Ashish <pa...@gmail.com>.
+1 (speaking as dev, it keeps life a bit simple)
Would wait for the users to give +1's as they get directly affected
and possibly a few may have to upgrade Data Infrastructure.
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 4:00 AM, Hari Shreedharan
<hs...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> Flume devs,
>
> With Flume moving away from Java 6 in Flume 1.7, I would like to start a discussion on whether we should completely drop Hadoop-1 support. I am not sure we can even link against Hadoop-1 if we build with Java 7 as the minimum requirement. Even if we can, I think it might be a good idea to drop Hadoop 1 support at this point.
>
> Comments?
>
> Thanks,
> Hari Shreedharan
>
>
>
>
--
thanks
ashish
Blog: http://www.ashishpaliwal.com/blog
My Photo Galleries: http://www.pbase.com/ashishpaliwal