You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by Cliff Woolley <cl...@yahoo.com> on 2001/07/26 21:32:00 UTC
Tagging tree...
Here goes nothing. I never heard back about the 500 Server Error thing on
daedalus... if it turns out to be a showstopper we'll fix it later and
bump the tag.
--Cliff
--------------------------------------------------------------
Cliff Woolley
cliffwoolley@yahoo.com
Charlottesville, VA
Re: Tree tagged...
Posted by Justin Erenkrantz <je...@ebuilt.com>.
On Thu, Jul 26, 2001 at 03:47:14PM -0400, Cliff Woolley wrote:
>
>
> ...as APACHE_2_0_22_dev. Please check out that tag and make sure you can
> build and run it on as many platforms as possible. If all goes well, I'll
> bump the tag up to APACHE_2_0_22 and roll tomorrow, same bat time, same
> bat channel.
+1 on making APACHE_2_0_22_dev tag a beta (from the APR side).
Compiles and works acceptably on Linux and Solaris.
We've got some performance issues, but that shouldn't stop it from being
a beta. Hopefully, by the next beta, we can have these issues
addressed.
The threaded MPM is a putrid mess, but we all know that. -- justin
Re: Tree tagged...
Posted by Cliff Woolley <cl...@yahoo.com>.
On Thu, 26 Jul 2001, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
> Cliff Woolley wrote:
> > ...as APACHE_2_0_22_dev. Please check out that tag and make sure
> > you can build and run it on as many platforms as possible. If all
> > goes well, I'll bump the tag up to APACHE_2_0_22 and roll
> > tomorrow, same bat time, same bat channel.
>
> Builds and seems to work on Win32.
>
> Will 2.0.22 be another ALPHA version, or is Apache 2 now beta?
If 2.0.22 works well enough for three committers to +1 it as a beta and
nobody to veto it, then it's a beta. Otherwise we fix it and try
desperately to get 2.0.23 to be beta-quality. I strongly hope that we
don't have to do that, and that 2.0.22 will be beta 2 for Apache 2.0.
We'll know the answer to that question within the next few days... but
it's looking good so far. =-)
--Cliff
--------------------------------------------------------------
Cliff Woolley
cliffwoolley@yahoo.com
Charlottesville, VA
Re: Tree tagged...
Posted by Sebastian Bergmann <sb...@sebastian-bergmann.de>.
Cliff Woolley wrote:
> ...as APACHE_2_0_22_dev. Please check out that tag and make sure
> you can build and run it on as many platforms as possible. If all
> goes well, I'll bump the tag up to APACHE_2_0_22 and roll
> tomorrow, same bat time, same bat channel.
Builds and seems to work on Win32.
Will 2.0.22 be another ALPHA version, or is Apache 2 now beta?
--
Sebastian Bergmann Measure Traffic & Usability
http://sebastian-bergmann.de/ http://phpOpenTracker.de/
Re: Tree tagged...
Posted by Bill Stoddard <bi...@wstoddard.com>.
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2001 at 12:56:19PM +0100, David Reid wrote:
> > Fix is in APR so if it doesn't break anything then I'm happy :)
> >
> > FWIW, apache 2 went into some real world testing on beos bone a couple of
> > days ago and outperformed the other 2 web servers available for the platform
> > (both considered to be production-quality) both in terms of speed and
> > reliability. Only place it didn't get such rave reviews was configuration.
>
> Really?
>
> Apache 2.0 is getting whupped by WebLogic (*Java EJB container*) on
> Solaris 8 right now. I'll probably post some performance analysis
> next week (no time right now - sorry). -- justin
>
How embarassing :-)
Bill
Re: Tree tagged...
Posted by Justin Erenkrantz <je...@ebuilt.com>.
On Fri, Jul 27, 2001 at 12:56:19PM +0100, David Reid wrote:
> Fix is in APR so if it doesn't break anything then I'm happy :)
>
> FWIW, apache 2 went into some real world testing on beos bone a couple of
> days ago and outperformed the other 2 web servers available for the platform
> (both considered to be production-quality) both in terms of speed and
> reliability. Only place it didn't get such rave reviews was configuration.
Really?
Apache 2.0 is getting whupped by WebLogic (*Java EJB container*) on
Solaris 8 right now. I'll probably post some performance analysis
next week (no time right now - sorry). -- justin
Re: Tree tagged...
Posted by David Reid <dr...@jetnet.co.uk>.
Fix is in APR so if it doesn't break anything then I'm happy :)
FWIW, apache 2 went into some real world testing on beos bone a couple of
days ago and outperformed the other 2 web servers available for the platform
(both considered to be production-quality) both in terms of speed and
reliability. Only place it didn't get such rave reviews was configuration.
david
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Reid" <dr...@jetnet.co.uk>
To: <ne...@apache.org>
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 10:18 AM
Subject: Re: Tree tagged...
> Some changes made in APR mean that make install is broken on beos and I
> suspect on OS/2 as well... If it's going to be a beta it really should
> install correctly...
>
> Haven't had a chance to fix it yet but will try to look before going to
> Philly.
>
> david
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Cliff Woolley" <cl...@yahoo.com>
> To: <ne...@apache.org>
> Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2001 8:47 PM
> Subject: Tree tagged...
>
>
> >
> >
> > ...as APACHE_2_0_22_dev. Please check out that tag and make sure you
can
> > build and run it on as many platforms as possible. If all goes well,
I'll
> > bump the tag up to APACHE_2_0_22 and roll tomorrow, same bat time, same
> > bat channel.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Cliff
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------
> > Cliff Woolley
> > cliffwoolley@yahoo.com
> > Charlottesville, VA
> >
> >
> >
>
>
Re: Tree tagged...
Posted by David Reid <dr...@jetnet.co.uk>.
Some changes made in APR mean that make install is broken on beos and I
suspect on OS/2 as well... If it's going to be a beta it really should
install correctly...
Haven't had a chance to fix it yet but will try to look before going to
Philly.
david
----- Original Message -----
From: "Cliff Woolley" <cl...@yahoo.com>
To: <ne...@apache.org>
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2001 8:47 PM
Subject: Tree tagged...
>
>
> ...as APACHE_2_0_22_dev. Please check out that tag and make sure you can
> build and run it on as many platforms as possible. If all goes well, I'll
> bump the tag up to APACHE_2_0_22 and roll tomorrow, same bat time, same
> bat channel.
>
> Thanks,
> Cliff
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> Cliff Woolley
> cliffwoolley@yahoo.com
> Charlottesville, VA
>
>
>
Re: Tree tagged...
Posted by Greg Ames <gr...@remulak.net>.
Cliff Woolley wrote:
>
> ...as APACHE_2_0_22_dev. Please check out that tag and make sure you can
> build and run it on as many platforms as possible.
It's running on daedalus as of Thursday, 26-Jul-2001 21:20:55 PDT. And
yes, the bug db & suexec are healthy.
Greg
Tree tagged...
Posted by Cliff Woolley <cl...@yahoo.com>.
...as APACHE_2_0_22_dev. Please check out that tag and make sure you can
build and run it on as many platforms as possible. If all goes well, I'll
bump the tag up to APACHE_2_0_22 and roll tomorrow, same bat time, same
bat channel.
Thanks,
Cliff
--------------------------------------------------------------
Cliff Woolley
cliffwoolley@yahoo.com
Charlottesville, VA