You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@activemq.apache.org by Jim Alateras <ji...@comware.com.au> on 2007/07/17 15:19:30 UTC
clarification between 4.2 and 5.0
I was just wondering whether the only difference between the two
versions was that the 5.0 was target for JDK 5.x.
cheers
</jima>
Re: clarification between 4.2 and 5.0
Posted by Rob Davies <ra...@gmail.com>.
I think it should be asap! We need to vote on it though first
On Jul 24, 2007, at 4:42 AM, Jim Alateras wrote:
> Rob,
>
> Do you have a date for the 5.0 release?
>
> cheers
> </jima>
> Rob Davies wrote:
>> It was decided that because of the need to use JDK 5.0 - version
>> 4.2 should be re-named as 5.0 - so no difference at all ;)
>> On Jul 17, 2007, at 2:19 PM, Jim Alateras wrote:
>>> I was just wondering whether the only difference between the two
>>> versions was that the 5.0 was target for JDK 5.x.
>>>
>>> cheers
>>> </jima>
>
Re: clarification between 4.2 and 5.0
Posted by Jim Alateras <ji...@comware.com.au>.
Rob,
Do you have a date for the 5.0 release?
cheers
</jima>
Rob Davies wrote:
> It was decided that because of the need to use JDK 5.0 - version 4.2
> should be re-named as 5.0 - so no difference at all ;)
>
> On Jul 17, 2007, at 2:19 PM, Jim Alateras wrote:
>
>> I was just wondering whether the only difference between the two
>> versions was that the 5.0 was target for JDK 5.x.
>>
>> cheers
>> </jima>
>
>
Re: clarification between 4.2 and 5.0
Posted by Rob Davies <ra...@gmail.com>.
It was decided that because of the need to use JDK 5.0 - version 4.2
should be re-named as 5.0 - so no difference at all ;)
On Jul 17, 2007, at 2:19 PM, Jim Alateras wrote:
> I was just wondering whether the only difference between the two
> versions was that the 5.0 was target for JDK 5.x.
>
> cheers
> </jima>