Re: Supporting 3.3 and 3.2?

[Karsten Bräckelmann <gu...@rudersport.de>]

Sorry for replying to self.

On Fri, 2011-03-04 at 03:36 +0100, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> > Could we please make an official project statement that 3.2.x is 
> > unsupported and people should really update to 3.3.x?
> 
> There is no such decision yet. The 3.2 branch as-is is not unsupported,
> just rather stale. Yes, indeed, there *might* be rule and score fixes
> still in the pipe. Less so code, but there definitely are some rule
> fixes currently in limbo.
> 
> Even with officially dropping support for 3.2, there *still* will be
> questions regarding 3.2. You can not stop that with any "official"
> announcement. Some folks for whatever reason might be stuck to that
> branch.
> 
> That said, personally, with various Open Source projects, I have never
> given up support for old versions. As long as I *can* help people, I
> will.

Even more so, there is a HUGE difference between officially "supporting"
a branch via rule updates, and giving advice in helping fight spam or
using SA features -- regardless of the version.


-- 
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu\0.@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}