Creating src/include in 1.3

[Rodent of Unusual Size <Ke...@Golux.Com>]

Well, there have been a few yea votes for it, and no nays,
so at the end of the week (Thursday or Friday) I'm going to
create a src/include directory, move the .h files into it,
and update Configure and the Makefile.tmpls.  Win32 people
take note.

I'll be doing this in the 1.3 tree, since the 2.0 one is
kinda nebulous.

If anyone has any concerns or objections, speak now or hold
yer peace..

#ken	P-)}

Re: Creating src/include in 1.3

[Dean Gaudet <dg...@arctic.org>]

Yeah, it's best to put it into a subdirectory.  But the os sub-directory
shouldn't move, only the .h files should.

include/os-unix
include/os-win32
...

There's almost no need to make symlinks, we can just conditionalize the
include in conf.h

Dean

On Tue, 27 Jan 1998, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:

> > Well, there have been a few yea votes for it, and no nays,
> > so at the end of the week (Thursday or Friday) I'm going to
> > create a src/include directory, move the .h files into it,
> > and update Configure and the Makefile.tmpls.  Win32 people
> > take note.
> > 
> > I'll be doing this in the 1.3 tree, since the 2.0 one is
> > kinda nebulous.
> > 
> > If anyone has any concerns or objections, speak now or hold
> > yer peace..
> 
> Does that mean the os sub-directory is going to move from src/os to
> src/include/os ?
> 
> -Rasmus
> 
> 

Re: Creating src/include in 1.3

[Rasmus Lerdorf <ra...@lerdorf.on.ca>]

> Well, there have been a few yea votes for it, and no nays,
> so at the end of the week (Thursday or Friday) I'm going to
> create a src/include directory, move the .h files into it,
> and update Configure and the Makefile.tmpls.  Win32 people
> take note.
> 
> I'll be doing this in the 1.3 tree, since the 2.0 one is
> kinda nebulous.
> 
> If anyone has any concerns or objections, speak now or hold
> yer peace..

Does that mean the os sub-directory is going to move from src/os to
src/include/os ?

-Rasmus