A

[Jacques Le Roux <ja...@les7arts.com>]

So we don't apply a lazy consensus here and we need a vote? Why not follow the advice in this page?

Note that I have no strong opinion on putting the ASL2 header or not, I want things to be consistent

Jacques


Le 01/09/2016 � 10:48, Jacopo Cappellato a �crit :
> I still don't see where the consensus was reached: discussions in Jira are
> not the same as discussion on the dev list (which is mentioned by Jacques
> in "as per consensus in dev mail thread"). Also the conversation between
> Jacques and Pierre in Jira is resolved with an unclear resolution to me.
> In my opinion it is safer to include the license header in all the files,
> including README files and the cost of adding it is negligible.
>
> Jacopo
>
> On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 10:10 AM, Pierre Smits <pi...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Actually I asked first whether there was consensus. And that was confirmed.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Pierre Smits
>>
>> ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>
>> OFBiz based solutions & services
>>
>> OFBiz Extensions Marketplace
>> http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 9:58 AM, Jacques Le Roux <
>> jacques.le.roux@les7arts.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Actually Pierre just followed http://www.apache.org/legal/sr
>>> c-headers.html#faq-exceptions
>>>
>>> <<Other files may make sense to have no license header. Three examples
>> are:
>>>   * Short informational text files; for example README, INSTALL files. The
>>> expectation is that these files make it obvious which product they relate
>>> to.>>
>>>
>>> That seems OK with me
>>>
>>> Jacques
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Le 01/09/2016 � 08:36, Jacopo Cappellato a �crit :
>>>
>>>> On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 6:53 AM, <jl...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> ...
>>>>> Legal statements are not required in readme files, as per consensus in
>>>>> dev
>>>>> mail thread with title 'Shorter ASL2 header in short files'. The mail
>>>>> thread started here: http://ofbiz.markmail.org/
>> message/pc5bzrsiupef7xjt
>>>>>
>>>>> Consensus? I was actually the only one to reply to your proposal and I
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> "In my opinion we should include the full header, that is important
>>>> to comply with the ASF licenses policies, unless there is a strong
>> reason
>>>> for not doing so.
>>>> [...]
>>>> By the way, my preference is, inline with what is mentioned in that
>>>> document, to "err on having a source header and contact legal-discuss@
>> if
>>>> unsure."
>>>>
>>>> Jacopo
>>>>
>>>>