You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@mesos.apache.org by "Joerg Schad (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/09/11 15:06:20 UTC
[jira] [Issue Comment Deleted] (MESOS-5070) Introduce more flexible
subprocess interface for child options.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-5070?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Joerg Schad updated MESOS-5070:
-------------------------------
Comment: was deleted
(was: 1.
Where do you want to rename Hook -> ParentHook? If you refer to Subprocess::Hook this is used for both ParentHooks and ChildHooks, so I see no reason to rename it.
2.
Watchdog is a different concept than a ChildHook:
A ChildHook is a function which is executed before the actual function, where the watchdog process is running during the entire lifetime of the process.
[code]
// Creates a seperate watchdog process to monitor the child process and
// kill it in case the parent process dies.
[code]
I would be happy to rename it 'Supervisor', but in a different review :-).)
> Introduce more flexible subprocess interface for child options.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MESOS-5070
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-5070
> Project: Mesos
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Joerg Schad
> Assignee: Joerg Schad
> Labels: tech-debt
>
> We introduced a number of parameters to the subprocess interface with MESOS-5049.
> Adding all options explicitly to the subprocess interface makes it inflexible.
> We should investigate a flexible options, which still prevents arbitrary code to be executed.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)