You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@shale.apache.org by Greg Reddin <gr...@gmail.com> on 2008/05/12 17:48:12 UTC
[VOTE] Release Shale Master POM Version 3
This is the formal vote for the new Shale master POM version 3. The
former vote for the same version was cancelled due to problems in the
POM. The POM was corrected and the release process was re-executed
since the previous release had not been copied to the main repository.
You can find the signed release candidate at [1].
Please vote
+1 if you reviewed the new master pom and approve of it
-1 if you found a flaw or potential problem with the new master pom
Thanks,
Greg
[1] http://people.apache.org/builds/shale/m2-staging-repository/org/apache/shale/shale-master/3/
[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Shale Master POM Version 3
Posted by Greg Reddin <gr...@gmail.com>.
The vote has passed with three binding +1s and no -1s. I will complete
the release process today and hopefully start on a 1.0.5 framework
release.
Thanks,
Greg
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 9:03 AM, Greg Reddin <gr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 11:44 AM, Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> (I'm having trouble actually building Shale (test failures, problems
>> in the Tiger module, missing Cargo dependency?) but I see no reason to
>> hold up the master pom release.)
>
> Is that occurring when building the trunk or the 1_0_X branch? I think
> I've fixed all the problems in the 1.0 branch, but I haven't looked at
> the trunk yet.
>
> Greg
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Shale Master POM Version 3
Posted by Greg Reddin <gr...@gmail.com>.
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 11:44 AM, Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> (I'm having trouble actually building Shale (test failures, problems
> in the Tiger module, missing Cargo dependency?) but I see no reason to
> hold up the master pom release.)
Is that occurring when building the trunk or the 1_0_X branch? I think
I've fixed all the problems in the 1.0 branch, but I haven't looked at
the trunk yet.
Greg
Re: [VOTE] Release Shale Master POM Version 3
Posted by Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com>.
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 8:48 AM, Greg Reddin <gr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This is the formal vote for the new Shale master POM version 3. The
> former vote for the same version was cancelled due to problems in the
> POM. The POM was corrected and the release process was re-executed
> since the previous release had not been copied to the main repository.
>
> You can find the signed release candidate at [1].
> [1] http://people.apache.org/builds/shale/m2-staging-repository/org/apache/shale/shale-master/3/
+1 -- it looks fine, signatures and checksums are present (though I
didn't check them).
(I'm having trouble actually building Shale (test failures, problems
in the Tiger module, missing Cargo dependency?) but I see no reason to
hold up the master pom release.)
--
Wendy
Re: [VOTE] Release Shale Master POM Version 3
Posted by Rahul Akolkar <ra...@gmail.com>.
On 5/12/08, Greg Reddin <gr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This is the formal vote for the new Shale master POM version 3. The
> former vote for the same version was cancelled due to problems in the
> POM. The POM was corrected and the release process was re-executed
> since the previous release had not been copied to the main repository.
>
> You can find the signed release candidate at [1].
>
> Please vote
> +1 if you reviewed the new master pom and approve of it
> -1 if you found a flaw or potential problem with the new master pom
>
<snip/>
+1
-Rahul
> Thanks,
> Greg
>
> [1] http://people.apache.org/builds/shale/m2-staging-repository/org/apache/shale/shale-master/3/
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Shale Master POM Version 3
Posted by Paul Spencer <pa...@apache.org>.
Greg,
I have looked over the pom, but not tried to use it. Nothing in pom
looked bad. Based on that I would give it a qualified +1.
Paul Spencer
Greg Reddin wrote:
> On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 10:48 AM, Greg Reddin <gr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Please vote
>> +1 if you reviewed the new master pom and approve of it
>> -1 if you found a flaw or potential problem with the new master pom
>
> Here's my +1.
>
> Anybody else care to vote on this one?
>
> Greg
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Shale Master POM Version 3
Posted by Greg Reddin <gr...@gmail.com>.
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 10:48 AM, Greg Reddin <gr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Please vote
> +1 if you reviewed the new master pom and approve of it
> -1 if you found a flaw or potential problem with the new master pom
Here's my +1.
Anybody else care to vote on this one?
Greg