You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by Paul Querna <ch...@force-elite.com> on 2006/11/08 18:39:54 UTC
Time for 1.2.8, was Re: Time for 2.2.4?
Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Looking over CHANGES and STATUS, I think we should
> start thinking about a 2.2.4 release. Comments?
> I offer to be RM.
I think we should start thinking about it too. I think we should also
consider requesting that APR{,-Util} 1.2.8 gets done by the APR
developers...
With the APR hat on, I volunteer to RM a 1.2.x release of APR and
APR-Util. How does this Saturday as a release cut time sound for everyone?
-Paul
Re: Time for 1.2.8, was Re: Time for 2.2.4?
Posted by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>.
Scroll back a half hour :)
Seriously - do folks need the extra day - or does anyone object to Friday
midday?
Paul Querna wrote:
> Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> Looking over CHANGES and STATUS, I think we should
>> start thinking about a 2.2.4 release. Comments?
>> I offer to be RM.
>
> I think we should start thinking about it too. I think we should also
> consider requesting that APR{,-Util} 1.2.8 gets done by the APR
> developers...
>
> With the APR hat on, I volunteer to RM a 1.2.x release of APR and
> APR-Util. How does this Saturday as a release cut time sound for everyone?
>
> -Paul
>
>
> .
>
Re: Time for 1.2.8, was Re: Time for 2.2.4?
Posted by Jorge Schrauwen <jo...@gmail.com>.
while we are on the subject to of apr...
May i ask why the lib's have a 1 appended to it in 2.2.x? Most (read nearly
all) 3rd party modules link to the old filename.
Jorge
On 11/8/06, Paul Querna <ch...@force-elite.com> wrote:
>
> Jim Jagielski wrote:
> > Looking over CHANGES and STATUS, I think we should
> > start thinking about a 2.2.4 release. Comments?
> > I offer to be RM.
>
> I think we should start thinking about it too. I think we should also
> consider requesting that APR{,-Util} 1.2.8 gets done by the APR
> developers...
>
> With the APR hat on, I volunteer to RM a 1.2.x release of APR and
> APR-Util. How does this Saturday as a release cut time sound for
> everyone?
>
> -Paul
>
>
--
~Jorge
Re: Time for 1.2.8, was Re: Time for 2.2.4?
Posted by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>.
Scroll back a half hour :)
Seriously - do folks need the extra day - or does anyone object to Friday
midday?
Paul Querna wrote:
> Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> Looking over CHANGES and STATUS, I think we should
>> start thinking about a 2.2.4 release. Comments?
>> I offer to be RM.
>
> I think we should start thinking about it too. I think we should also
> consider requesting that APR{,-Util} 1.2.8 gets done by the APR
> developers...
>
> With the APR hat on, I volunteer to RM a 1.2.x release of APR and
> APR-Util. How does this Saturday as a release cut time sound for everyone?
>
> -Paul
>
>
> .
>