[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1461) Cached filter for a single term field

["Uwe Schindler (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1461?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1461:
----------------------------------

    Attachment: LUCENE-1461.patch

Here is an first version of retrofitted FieldCacheRangeFilter. It supports StringIndex like before for normal string ranges and as an example Byte ranges on FieldCache.getBytes(). Optional a parser can be given, passed to getBytes(). The internal code structure was changed to make it easier to implement the iterator for each data type.

The test currently only checks StringIndex (it is the original test), other datatypes beyond byte are not implemented until now (it's mostly copy'n'paste...)

> Cached filter for a single term field
> -------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-1461
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1461
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>            Reporter: Tim Sturge
>            Assignee: Uwe Schindler
>             Fix For: 2.9
>
>         Attachments: DisjointMultiFilter.java, FieldCacheRangeFilter.patch, LUCENE-1461.patch, LUCENE-1461.patch, LUCENE-1461a.patch, LUCENE-1461b.patch, LUCENE-1461c.patch, RangeMultiFilter.java, RangeMultiFilter.java, TermMultiFilter.java, TestFieldCacheRangeFilter.patch
>
>
> These classes implement inexpensive range filtering over a field containing a single term. They do this by building an integer array of term numbers (storing the term->number mapping in a TreeMap) and then implementing a fast integer comparison based DocSetIdIterator.
> This code is currently being used to do age range filtering, but could also be used to do other date filtering or in any application where there need to be multiple filters based on the same single term field. I have an untested implementation of single term filtering and have considered but not yet implemented term set filtering (useful for location based searches) as well. 
> The code here is fairly rough; it works but lacks javadocs and toString() and hashCode() methods etc. I'm posting it here to discover if there is other interest in this feature; I don't mind fixing it up but would hate to go to the effort if it's not going to make it into Lucene.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org