You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@flink.apache.org by Dániel Berecz <be...@gmail.com> on 2018/10/03 00:23:43 UTC

MapState support for operator state

Hi everyone,

I would like to ask if there is any conceptual problem with having MapState
available for operator states, or is it just a lack of implementation?

Best regards,
Daniel Berecz

Re: MapState support for operator state

Posted by Dániel Berecz <bd...@info.ilab.sztaki.hu>.

Hi Till,

sorry for this. I sent this e-mail from my other account, which is not
subscribed to this thread and according to the website should have been
rejected. Once I realized it I sent another e-mail from the correct account.

Bestt,
Daniel

Till Rohrmann <tr...@apache.org> ezt írta (időpont: 2018. okt. 8., H,
9:18):

> Hi Daniel,
>
> Didn't you post this question before? Let's not spread the discussion out
> over multiple threads.
>
> Cheers,
> Till
>
> On Sun, Oct 7, 2018 at 4:27 PM Dániel Berecz <be...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I would like to ask if there is any conceptual problem with having
> MapState
> > available for operator states, or is it just a lack of implementation?
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Daniel Berecz
> >
>

Re: MapState support for operator state

Posted by Till Rohrmann <tr...@apache.org>.

Hi Daniel,

Didn't you post this question before? Let's not spread the discussion out
over multiple threads.

Cheers,
Till

On Sun, Oct 7, 2018 at 4:27 PM Dániel Berecz <be...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi everyone,
>
> I would like to ask if there is any conceptual problem with having MapState
> available for operator states, or is it just a lack of implementation?
>
> Best regards,
> Daniel Berecz
>