You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@openoffice.apache.org by Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de> on 2021/03/16 15:26:53 UTC
Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?
Hi all,
The subject says it all... ;-)
No exact time frame, but we could include a full set of updated
translations from Pootle here.
Regards,
Matthias
Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?
Posted by Aivaras Stepukonis <as...@gmail.com>.
That'd be great!
Regards,
Aivaras
2021-06-29 13:00, Matthias Seidel rašė:
> Updated translations should be part of every 4.2.x release in the future.
Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?
Posted by Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de>.
Hi Aivaras,
Am 27.06.21 um 10:29 schrieb Aivaras Stepukonis:
> Hi,
>
> I welcome any step that brings us closer to v4.2. There has been done
> quite a bit in the translations that sits in Pootle for years without
> reaching the users. We should be updating the translations more often.
That is one of the goals of AOO 4.2.0: Bringing back translations and
the ability to introduce changes in the UI/Help.
I started on this project years ago working on translation, just to see,
that it didn't find its way into a release. I know that this can be
frustrating...
Updated translations should be part of every 4.2.x release in the future.
Regards,
Matthias
>
> Regards,
>
> Aivaras
>
> 2021-06-26 17:55, Matthias Seidel rašė:
>> 3 month later, I assume there is no interest in releasing a Dev3?
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Matthias
>>
>> Am 23.03.21 um 16:54 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>> Hi Jim,
>>>
>>> I would suggest we build the same language set as in Dev 2.
>>>
>>> That means 41+5 languages:
>>>
>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/devtools/build-scripts/4.2.0-Dev2/wntmsci/Pack-dev.lst
>>>
>>>
>>> @Mechtilde: What about new Pootle templates? We had a lot of string
>>> changes...
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Matthias
>>>
>>> Am 23.03.21 um 16:03 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>>> In an effort to save some time and resources, can we confirm on
>>>> whether or not we are building the full language set?
>>>>
>>>>> On Mar 20, 2021, at 2:04 PM, Matthias Seidel
>>>>> <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> I have created the directory structure for Dev3:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.2.0-Dev3/
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 17.03.21 um 18:00 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>>>>> Hi Arrigo,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Am 16.03.21 um 21:53 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori:
>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 04:26:53PM +0100, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The subject says it all... ;-)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No exact time frame, but we could include a full set of updated
>>>>>>>> translations from Pootle here.
>>>>>>> I would also like to have some pull requests merged, if possible!
>>>>>> Definitely!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The next step would be to solve the Release Blocker for 4.2.0 and
>>>>>> release it! ;-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And I am still tackling bug #126869. Man, UNO is... big!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>
Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?
Posted by Aivaras Stepukonis <as...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
I welcome any step that brings us closer to v4.2. There has been done
quite a bit in the translations that sits in Pootle for years without
reaching the users. We should be updating the translations more often.
Regards,
Aivaras
2021-06-26 17:55, Matthias Seidel rašė:
> 3 month later, I assume there is no interest in releasing a Dev3?
>
> Regards,
>
> Matthias
>
> Am 23.03.21 um 16:54 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>> Hi Jim,
>>
>> I would suggest we build the same language set as in Dev 2.
>>
>> That means 41+5 languages:
>>
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/devtools/build-scripts/4.2.0-Dev2/wntmsci/Pack-dev.lst
>>
>> @Mechtilde: What about new Pootle templates? We had a lot of string
>> changes...
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Matthias
>>
>> Am 23.03.21 um 16:03 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>> In an effort to save some time and resources, can we confirm on whether or not we are building the full language set?
>>>
>>>> On Mar 20, 2021, at 2:04 PM, Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> I have created the directory structure for Dev3:
>>>>
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.2.0-Dev3/
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Matthias
>>>>
>>>> Am 17.03.21 um 18:00 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>>>> Hi Arrigo,
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 16.03.21 um 21:53 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori:
>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 04:26:53PM +0100, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The subject says it all... ;-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No exact time frame, but we could include a full set of updated
>>>>>>> translations from Pootle here.
>>>>>> I would also like to have some pull requests merged, if possible!
>>>>> Definitely!
>>>>>
>>>>> The next step would be to solve the Release Blocker for 4.2.0 and
>>>>> release it! ;-)
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>
>>>>>> And I am still tackling bug #126869. Man, UNO is... big!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>>>
>>>
Re: AOO420-Dev3-m3 (Was: Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?)
Posted by Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de>.
Am 08.08.21 um 15:53 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> These are developer previews and not actual Releases so I don't think so. Easy to add though.
Thanks! I think they are needed when we publish builds as AOO project.
Personal builds don't...
Windows builds are also complete now!
Regards,
Matthias
>
>> On Aug 7, 2021, at 7:28 AM, Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>>
>> Don't expect Windows binaries before tomorrow... ;-)
>>
>> BTW: Aren't we required to give signatures and hashes on the Apache server?
>>
>> Matthias
>>
>> Am 06.08.21 um 16:49 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>>> On Aug 6, 2021, at 10:12 AM, Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> That's c9282f5c5c ?
>>> Yep. That's right!
>>>> Building for Windows now. Might take some time, since I can do only
>>>> single threaded build with Cygwin 3.2.0.
>>>>
>>> Yikes!
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>
Re: AOO420-Dev3-m3 (Was: Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?)
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
These are developer previews and not actual Releases so I don't think so. Easy to add though.
> On Aug 7, 2021, at 7:28 AM, Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>
> Don't expect Windows binaries before tomorrow... ;-)
>
> BTW: Aren't we required to give signatures and hashes on the Apache server?
>
> Matthias
>
> Am 06.08.21 um 16:49 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>
>>> On Aug 6, 2021, at 10:12 AM, Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>>>
>>> That's c9282f5c5c ?
>> Yep. That's right!
>>> Building for Windows now. Might take some time, since I can do only
>>> single threaded build with Cygwin 3.2.0.
>>>
>> Yikes!
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
Re: AOO420-Dev3-m3 (Was: Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?)
Posted by Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de>.
Don't expect Windows binaries before tomorrow... ;-)
BTW: Aren't we required to give signatures and hashes on the Apache server?
Matthias
Am 06.08.21 um 16:49 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>
>> On Aug 6, 2021, at 10:12 AM, Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>>
>> That's c9282f5c5c ?
> Yep. That's right!
>> Building for Windows now. Might take some time, since I can do only
>> single threaded build with Cygwin 3.2.0.
>>
> Yikes!
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>
Re: AOO420-Dev3-m3 (Was: Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?)
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
> On Aug 6, 2021, at 10:12 AM, Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>
> That's c9282f5c5c ?
Yep. That's right!
>
> Building for Windows now. Might take some time, since I can do only
> single threaded build with Cygwin 3.2.0.
>
Yikes!
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
Re: AOO420-Dev3-m3 (Was: Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?)
Posted by Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de>.
That's c9282f5c5c ?
Building for Windows now. Might take some time, since I can do only
single threaded build with Cygwin 3.2.0.
Matthias
Am 06.08.21 um 13:46 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> I have tagged AOO420-Dev3-m3 and am working on the builds.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>
AOO420-Dev3-m3 (Was: Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?)
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
I have tagged AOO420-Dev3-m3 and am working on the builds.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
I think I will tag tomorrow morning and start some builds :-)
> On Aug 3, 2021, at 12:48 PM, Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>
> Ready, when you are! ;-)
>
> Am 03.08.21 um 18:44 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> I'd like to spend some time on the ODS bug on macOS:
>>
>> Executive Summary (TL;DR ;-)
>> ============================
>> A boolean setting is not recognized as a boolean. An exception is
>> thrown when accessing it. The exception is swallowed and the XML
>> files' contents are not written.
>>
>>
>>> On Aug 3, 2021, at 5:13 AM, Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>>>
>>> I would be able to upload the Windows binaries now...
>>>
>>> @Jim: Can you create a tag on GitHub and provide macOS and Linux builds?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Matthias
>>>
>>> Am 01.08.21 um 23:30 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Just FYI: I just build a AOO420-Dev3 for Windows (as a test) based on
>>>> Git hash 494e99f846.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Matthias
>>>>
>>>> Am 31.07.21 um 17:26 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> Next weekend? Any idea?
>>>>>
>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 29.07.21 um 15:21 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Am 27.07.21 um 19:11 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori:
>>>>>>> Hello All,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 06:56:25PM +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi Jim,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Am 27.07.21 um 17:44 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>>>>>>>> Snapshot works for me
>>>>>>>> Great! What do others think?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Commits are low at the moment, so we could start any time...
>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>> I would have time this weekend...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>>
>>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?
Posted by Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de>.
Ready, when you are! ;-)
Am 03.08.21 um 18:44 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> I'd like to spend some time on the ODS bug on macOS:
>
> Executive Summary (TL;DR ;-)
> ============================
> A boolean setting is not recognized as a boolean. An exception is
> thrown when accessing it. The exception is swallowed and the XML
> files' contents are not written.
>
>
>> On Aug 3, 2021, at 5:13 AM, Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>>
>> I would be able to upload the Windows binaries now...
>>
>> @Jim: Can you create a tag on GitHub and provide macOS and Linux builds?
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Matthias
>>
>> Am 01.08.21 um 23:30 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Just FYI: I just build a AOO420-Dev3 for Windows (as a test) based on
>>> Git hash 494e99f846.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Matthias
>>>
>>> Am 31.07.21 um 17:26 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> Next weekend? Any idea?
>>>>
>>>> Matthias
>>>>
>>>> Am 29.07.21 um 15:21 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 27.07.21 um 19:11 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori:
>>>>>> Hello All,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 06:56:25PM +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Jim,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Am 27.07.21 um 17:44 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>>>>>>> Snapshot works for me
>>>>>>> Great! What do others think?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Commits are low at the moment, so we could start any time...
>>>>>> +1
>>>>> I would have time this weekend...
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>
>
Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
I'd like to spend some time on the ODS bug on macOS:
Executive Summary (TL;DR ;-)
============================
A boolean setting is not recognized as a boolean. An exception is
thrown when accessing it. The exception is swallowed and the XML
files' contents are not written.
> On Aug 3, 2021, at 5:13 AM, Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>
> I would be able to upload the Windows binaries now...
>
> @Jim: Can you create a tag on GitHub and provide macOS and Linux builds?
>
> Regards,
>
> Matthias
>
> Am 01.08.21 um 23:30 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Just FYI: I just build a AOO420-Dev3 for Windows (as a test) based on
>> Git hash 494e99f846.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Matthias
>>
>> Am 31.07.21 um 17:26 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Next weekend? Any idea?
>>>
>>> Matthias
>>>
>>> Am 29.07.21 um 15:21 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> Am 27.07.21 um 19:11 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori:
>>>>> Hello All,
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 06:56:25PM +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Jim,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Am 27.07.21 um 17:44 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>>>>>> Snapshot works for me
>>>>>> Great! What do others think?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Commits are low at the moment, so we could start any time...
>>>>> +1
>>>> I would have time this weekend...
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Matthias
>>>>
>
Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?
Posted by Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de>.
I would be able to upload the Windows binaries now...
@Jim: Can you create a tag on GitHub and provide macOS and Linux builds?
Regards,
Matthias
Am 01.08.21 um 23:30 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
> Hi,
>
> Just FYI: I just build a AOO420-Dev3 for Windows (as a test) based on
> Git hash 494e99f846.
>
> Regards,
>
> Matthias
>
> Am 31.07.21 um 17:26 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Next weekend? Any idea?
>>
>> Matthias
>>
>> Am 29.07.21 um 15:21 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Am 27.07.21 um 19:11 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori:
>>>> Hello All,
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 06:56:25PM +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Jim,
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 27.07.21 um 17:44 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>>>>> Snapshot works for me
>>>>> Great! What do others think?
>>>>>
>>>>> Commits are low at the moment, so we could start any time...
>>>> +1
>>> I would have time this weekend...
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Matthias
>>>
Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?
Posted by Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de>.
Hi,
Just FYI: I just build a AOO420-Dev3 for Windows (as a test) based on
Git hash 494e99f846.
Regards,
Matthias
Am 31.07.21 um 17:26 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
> Hi all,
>
> Next weekend? Any idea?
>
> Matthias
>
> Am 29.07.21 um 15:21 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Am 27.07.21 um 19:11 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori:
>>> Hello All,
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 06:56:25PM +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Jim,
>>>>
>>>> Am 27.07.21 um 17:44 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>>>> Snapshot works for me
>>>> Great! What do others think?
>>>>
>>>> Commits are low at the moment, so we could start any time...
>>> +1
>> I would have time this weekend...
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Matthias
>>
Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?
Posted by Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de>.
Hi all,
Next weekend? Any idea?
Matthias
Am 29.07.21 um 15:21 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
> Hi all,
>
> Am 27.07.21 um 19:11 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori:
>> Hello All,
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 06:56:25PM +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Jim,
>>>
>>> Am 27.07.21 um 17:44 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>>> Snapshot works for me
>>> Great! What do others think?
>>>
>>> Commits are low at the moment, so we could start any time...
>> +1
> I would have time this weekend...
>
> Regards,
>
> Matthias
>
Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?
Posted by Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de>.
Hi all,
Am 27.07.21 um 19:11 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori:
> Hello All,
>
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 06:56:25PM +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>
>> Hi Jim,
>>
>> Am 27.07.21 um 17:44 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>> Snapshot works for me
>> Great! What do others think?
>>
>> Commits are low at the moment, so we could start any time...
> +1
I would have time this weekend...
Regards,
Matthias
>
Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?
Posted by Arrigo Marchiori <ar...@yahoo.it.INVALID>.
Hello All,
On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 06:56:25PM +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Hi Jim,
>
> Am 27.07.21 um 17:44 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> > Snapshot works for me
>
> Great! What do others think?
>
> Commits are low at the moment, so we could start any time...
+1
--
Arrigo
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?
Posted by Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de>.
Hi Jim,
Am 27.07.21 um 17:44 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> Snapshot works for me
Great! What do others think?
Commits are low at the moment, so we could start any time...
Matthias
>
>> On Jul 23, 2021, at 10:43 AM, Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Jim,
>>
>> Am 16.07.21 um 13:39 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>> I'm ready for a dev3...
>> That's great!
>>
>> Are there any patches in the pipeline or do we want to do a "snapshot",
>> maybe with the latest translations?
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Matthias
>>
>>>> On Jun 29, 2021, at 7:37 PM, Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Keith,
>>>>
>>>> Am 30.06.21 um 01:17 schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
>>>>> On Tue, 29 Jun 2021 11:54:13 +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Keith,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Am 26.06.21 um 19:01 schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
>>>>>>> On Sat, 26 Jun 2021 16:55:52 +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 3 month later, I assume there is no interest in releasing a Dev3?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Mathias;
>>>>>>> Given the changes in Bugzilla I believe that it is time for a dev 3
>>>>>>> build.
>>>>>> Dev3 would be a "snapshot" of what is in our code. We could release it
>>>>>> at any time. Maybe we want to do a bit of cleanup before and update the
>>>>>> translations.
>>>>>>> We really also need to either start working on the Release Blockers or
>>>>>>> seriously look at pushing some of them off to a later release or we
>>>>>>> will never get a 4.2 Release.
>>>>>> Definitely!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But I think the remaining release blockers are all valid for this
>>>>>> release. So we should now concentrate on them.
>>>>>>
>>>>> What really has me concerned at this point is that we have 253 issues that
>>>>> are tagged for 4.2.0. This is an unwieldy number of issues to deal with
>>>>> given the resources that we have for QA.
>>>> Most of them are from the time when trunk=4.2.0
>>>>
>>>>> I am just not sure where we would want to set the bar as far as reducing
>>>>> that 253 to a reasonable number.
>>>> Feel free to adjust them to trunk/4.5.0
>>>>
>>>> We should concentrate on the Release Blocker. That is work enough.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Matthias
>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Keith
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> We need 4.2.0 as a basis for refreshed code and translations.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Keith
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Am 23.03.21 um 16:54 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>>>>>>>> Hi Jim,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I would suggest we build the same language set as in Dev 2.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> That means 41+5 languages:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/devtools/build-scripts/
>>>>> 4.2.0-
>>>>>>> Dev2/wntmsci/Pack-dev.lst
>>>>>>>>> @Mechtilde: What about new Pootle templates? We had a lot of string
>>>>>>>>> changes...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Am 23.03.21 um 16:03 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>>>>>>>>> In an effort to save some time and resources, can we confirm on
>>>>>>>>>> whether or not we are building the full language set?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 20, 2021, at 2:04 PM, Matthias Seidel
>>>>>>>>>>> <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I have created the directory structure for Dev3:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.2.0-Dev3/
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Am 17.03.21 um 18:00 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Arrigo,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 16.03.21 um 21:53 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 04:26:53PM +0100, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The subject says it all... ;-)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No exact time frame, but we could include a full set of updated
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> translations from Pootle here.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I would also like to have some pull requests merged, if possible!
>>>>>>>>>>>> Definitely!
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The next step would be to solve the Release Blocker for 4.2.0 and
>>>>>>>>>>>> release it! ;-)
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> And I am still tackling bug #126869. Man, UNO is... big!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org For
>>>>>>>>>> additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org For
>>>>>>> additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>
Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
Snapshot works for me
> On Jul 23, 2021, at 10:43 AM, Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>
> Hi Jim,
>
> Am 16.07.21 um 13:39 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> I'm ready for a dev3...
>
> That's great!
>
> Are there any patches in the pipeline or do we want to do a "snapshot",
> maybe with the latest translations?
>
> Regards,
>
> Matthias
>
>>
>>> On Jun 29, 2021, at 7:37 PM, Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Keith,
>>>
>>> Am 30.06.21 um 01:17 schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
>>>> On Tue, 29 Jun 2021 11:54:13 +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Keith,
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 26.06.21 um 19:01 schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
>>>>>> On Sat, 26 Jun 2021 16:55:52 +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 3 month later, I assume there is no interest in releasing a Dev3?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mathias;
>>>>>> Given the changes in Bugzilla I believe that it is time for a dev 3
>>>>>> build.
>>>>> Dev3 would be a "snapshot" of what is in our code. We could release it
>>>>> at any time. Maybe we want to do a bit of cleanup before and update the
>>>>> translations.
>>>>>> We really also need to either start working on the Release Blockers or
>>>>>> seriously look at pushing some of them off to a later release or we
>>>>>> will never get a 4.2 Release.
>>>>> Definitely!
>>>>>
>>>>> But I think the remaining release blockers are all valid for this
>>>>> release. So we should now concentrate on them.
>>>>>
>>>> What really has me concerned at this point is that we have 253 issues that
>>>> are tagged for 4.2.0. This is an unwieldy number of issues to deal with
>>>> given the resources that we have for QA.
>>> Most of them are from the time when trunk=4.2.0
>>>
>>>> I am just not sure where we would want to set the bar as far as reducing
>>>> that 253 to a reasonable number.
>>> Feel free to adjust them to trunk/4.5.0
>>>
>>> We should concentrate on the Release Blocker. That is work enough.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Matthias
>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Keith
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> We need 4.2.0 as a basis for refreshed code and translations.
>>>>>
>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Keith
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Am 23.03.21 um 16:54 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>>>>>>> Hi Jim,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I would suggest we build the same language set as in Dev 2.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That means 41+5 languages:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/devtools/build-scripts/
>>>> 4.2.0-
>>>>>> Dev2/wntmsci/Pack-dev.lst
>>>>>>>> @Mechtilde: What about new Pootle templates? We had a lot of string
>>>>>>>> changes...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Am 23.03.21 um 16:03 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>>>>>>>> In an effort to save some time and resources, can we confirm on
>>>>>>>>> whether or not we are building the full language set?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 20, 2021, at 2:04 PM, Matthias Seidel
>>>>>>>>>> <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I have created the directory structure for Dev3:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.2.0-Dev3/
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Am 17.03.21 um 18:00 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Arrigo,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Am 16.03.21 um 21:53 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 04:26:53PM +0100, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The subject says it all... ;-)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> No exact time frame, but we could include a full set of updated
>>>>>>>>>>>>> translations from Pootle here.
>>>>>>>>>>>> I would also like to have some pull requests merged, if possible!
>>>>>>>>>>> Definitely!
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The next step would be to solve the Release Blocker for 4.2.0 and
>>>>>>>>>>> release it! ;-)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> And I am still tackling bug #126869. Man, UNO is... big!
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org For
>>>>>>>>> additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org For
>>>>>> additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?
Posted by Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de>.
@Mechtilde:
Any thoughts on the translation?
Regards,
Matthias
Am 23.07.21 um 16:43 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
> Hi Jim,
>
> Am 16.07.21 um 13:39 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> I'm ready for a dev3...
> That's great!
>
> Are there any patches in the pipeline or do we want to do a "snapshot",
> maybe with the latest translations?
>
> Regards,
>
> Matthias
>
>>> On Jun 29, 2021, at 7:37 PM, Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Keith,
>>>
>>> Am 30.06.21 um 01:17 schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
>>>> On Tue, 29 Jun 2021 11:54:13 +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Keith,
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 26.06.21 um 19:01 schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
>>>>>> On Sat, 26 Jun 2021 16:55:52 +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 3 month later, I assume there is no interest in releasing a Dev3?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mathias;
>>>>>> Given the changes in Bugzilla I believe that it is time for a dev 3
>>>>>> build.
>>>>> Dev3 would be a "snapshot" of what is in our code. We could release it
>>>>> at any time. Maybe we want to do a bit of cleanup before and update the
>>>>> translations.
>>>>>> We really also need to either start working on the Release Blockers or
>>>>>> seriously look at pushing some of them off to a later release or we
>>>>>> will never get a 4.2 Release.
>>>>> Definitely!
>>>>>
>>>>> But I think the remaining release blockers are all valid for this
>>>>> release. So we should now concentrate on them.
>>>>>
>>>> What really has me concerned at this point is that we have 253 issues that
>>>> are tagged for 4.2.0. This is an unwieldy number of issues to deal with
>>>> given the resources that we have for QA.
>>> Most of them are from the time when trunk=4.2.0
>>>
>>>> I am just not sure where we would want to set the bar as far as reducing
>>>> that 253 to a reasonable number.
>>> Feel free to adjust them to trunk/4.5.0
>>>
>>> We should concentrate on the Release Blocker. That is work enough.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Matthias
>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Keith
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> We need 4.2.0 as a basis for refreshed code and translations.
>>>>>
>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Keith
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Am 23.03.21 um 16:54 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>>>>>>> Hi Jim,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I would suggest we build the same language set as in Dev 2.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That means 41+5 languages:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/devtools/build-scripts/
>>>> 4.2.0-
>>>>>> Dev2/wntmsci/Pack-dev.lst
>>>>>>>> @Mechtilde: What about new Pootle templates? We had a lot of string
>>>>>>>> changes...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Am 23.03.21 um 16:03 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>>>>>>>> In an effort to save some time and resources, can we confirm on
>>>>>>>>> whether or not we are building the full language set?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 20, 2021, at 2:04 PM, Matthias Seidel
>>>>>>>>>> <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I have created the directory structure for Dev3:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.2.0-Dev3/
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Am 17.03.21 um 18:00 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Arrigo,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Am 16.03.21 um 21:53 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 04:26:53PM +0100, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The subject says it all... ;-)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> No exact time frame, but we could include a full set of updated
>>>>>>>>>>>>> translations from Pootle here.
>>>>>>>>>>>> I would also like to have some pull requests merged, if possible!
>>>>>>>>>>> Definitely!
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The next step would be to solve the Release Blocker for 4.2.0 and
>>>>>>>>>>> release it! ;-)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> And I am still tackling bug #126869. Man, UNO is... big!
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org For
>>>>>>>>> additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org For
>>>>>> additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?
Posted by Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de>.
Hi Jim,
Am 16.07.21 um 13:39 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> I'm ready for a dev3...
That's great!
Are there any patches in the pipeline or do we want to do a "snapshot",
maybe with the latest translations?
Regards,
Matthias
>
>> On Jun 29, 2021, at 7:37 PM, Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Keith,
>>
>> Am 30.06.21 um 01:17 schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
>>> On Tue, 29 Jun 2021 11:54:13 +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Keith,
>>>>
>>>> Am 26.06.21 um 19:01 schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
>>>>> On Sat, 26 Jun 2021 16:55:52 +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> 3 month later, I assume there is no interest in releasing a Dev3?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>>
>>>>> Mathias;
>>>>> Given the changes in Bugzilla I believe that it is time for a dev 3
>>>>> build.
>>>> Dev3 would be a "snapshot" of what is in our code. We could release it
>>>> at any time. Maybe we want to do a bit of cleanup before and update the
>>>> translations.
>>>>> We really also need to either start working on the Release Blockers or
>>>>> seriously look at pushing some of them off to a later release or we
>>>>> will never get a 4.2 Release.
>>>> Definitely!
>>>>
>>>> But I think the remaining release blockers are all valid for this
>>>> release. So we should now concentrate on them.
>>>>
>>> What really has me concerned at this point is that we have 253 issues that
>>> are tagged for 4.2.0. This is an unwieldy number of issues to deal with
>>> given the resources that we have for QA.
>> Most of them are from the time when trunk=4.2.0
>>
>>> I am just not sure where we would want to set the bar as far as reducing
>>> that 253 to a reasonable number.
>> Feel free to adjust them to trunk/4.5.0
>>
>> We should concentrate on the Release Blocker. That is work enough.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Matthias
>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Keith
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> We need 4.2.0 as a basis for refreshed code and translations.
>>>>
>>>> Matthias
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Keith
>>>>>
>>>>>> Am 23.03.21 um 16:54 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>>>>>> Hi Jim,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I would suggest we build the same language set as in Dev 2.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That means 41+5 languages:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/devtools/build-scripts/
>>> 4.2.0-
>>>>> Dev2/wntmsci/Pack-dev.lst
>>>>>>> @Mechtilde: What about new Pootle templates? We had a lot of string
>>>>>>> changes...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Am 23.03.21 um 16:03 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>>>>>>> In an effort to save some time and resources, can we confirm on
>>>>>>>> whether or not we are building the full language set?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Mar 20, 2021, at 2:04 PM, Matthias Seidel
>>>>>>>>> <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I have created the directory structure for Dev3:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.2.0-Dev3/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Am 17.03.21 um 18:00 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>>>>>>>>> Hi Arrigo,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Am 16.03.21 um 21:53 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori:
>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 04:26:53PM +0100, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The subject says it all... ;-)
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> No exact time frame, but we could include a full set of updated
>>>>>>>>>>>> translations from Pootle here.
>>>>>>>>>>> I would also like to have some pull requests merged, if possible!
>>>>>>>>>> Definitely!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The next step would be to solve the Release Blocker for 4.2.0 and
>>>>>>>>>> release it! ;-)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> And I am still tackling bug #126869. Man, UNO is... big!
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org For
>>>>>>>> additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org For
>>>>> additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>
Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
I'm ready for a dev3...
> On Jun 29, 2021, at 7:37 PM, Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>
> Hi Keith,
>
> Am 30.06.21 um 01:17 schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
>> On Tue, 29 Jun 2021 11:54:13 +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Keith,
>>>
>>> Am 26.06.21 um 19:01 schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
>>>> On Sat, 26 Jun 2021 16:55:52 +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> 3 month later, I assume there is no interest in releasing a Dev3?
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>
>>>> Mathias;
>>>> Given the changes in Bugzilla I believe that it is time for a dev 3
>>>> build.
>>> Dev3 would be a "snapshot" of what is in our code. We could release it
>>> at any time. Maybe we want to do a bit of cleanup before and update the
>>> translations.
>>>> We really also need to either start working on the Release Blockers or
>>>> seriously look at pushing some of them off to a later release or we
>>>> will never get a 4.2 Release.
>>> Definitely!
>>>
>>> But I think the remaining release blockers are all valid for this
>>> release. So we should now concentrate on them.
>>>
>> What really has me concerned at this point is that we have 253 issues that
>> are tagged for 4.2.0. This is an unwieldy number of issues to deal with
>> given the resources that we have for QA.
>
> Most of them are from the time when trunk=4.2.0
>
>> I am just not sure where we would want to set the bar as far as reducing
>> that 253 to a reasonable number.
> Feel free to adjust them to trunk/4.5.0
>
> We should concentrate on the Release Blocker. That is work enough.
>
> Regards,
>
> Matthias
>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Keith
>>
>>
>>
>>> We need 4.2.0 as a basis for refreshed code and translations.
>>>
>>> Matthias
>>>
>>>
>>>> Keith
>>>>
>>>>> Am 23.03.21 um 16:54 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>>>>> Hi Jim,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I would suggest we build the same language set as in Dev 2.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That means 41+5 languages:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/devtools/build-scripts/
>> 4.2.0-
>>>> Dev2/wntmsci/Pack-dev.lst
>>>>>> @Mechtilde: What about new Pootle templates? We had a lot of string
>>>>>> changes...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Am 23.03.21 um 16:03 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>>>>>> In an effort to save some time and resources, can we confirm on
>>>>>>> whether or not we are building the full language set?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mar 20, 2021, at 2:04 PM, Matthias Seidel
>>>>>>>> <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I have created the directory structure for Dev3:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.2.0-Dev3/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Am 17.03.21 um 18:00 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>>>>>>>> Hi Arrigo,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Am 16.03.21 um 21:53 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori:
>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 04:26:53PM +0100, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The subject says it all... ;-)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> No exact time frame, but we could include a full set of updated
>>>>>>>>>>> translations from Pootle here.
>>>>>>>>>> I would also like to have some pull requests merged, if possible!
>>>>>>>>> Definitely!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The next step would be to solve the Release Blocker for 4.2.0 and
>>>>>>>>> release it! ;-)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> And I am still tackling bug #126869. Man, UNO is... big!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org For
>>>>>>> additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org For
>>>> additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?
Posted by Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de>.
Hi Keith,
Am 30.06.21 um 01:17 schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
> On Tue, 29 Jun 2021 11:54:13 +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>
>> Hi Keith,
>>
>> Am 26.06.21 um 19:01 schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
>>> On Sat, 26 Jun 2021 16:55:52 +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>>
>>>> 3 month later, I assume there is no interest in releasing a Dev3?
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Matthias
>>>>
>>> Mathias;
>>> Given the changes in Bugzilla I believe that it is time for a dev 3
>>> build.
>> Dev3 would be a "snapshot" of what is in our code. We could release it
>> at any time. Maybe we want to do a bit of cleanup before and update the
>> translations.
>>> We really also need to either start working on the Release Blockers or
>>> seriously look at pushing some of them off to a later release or we
>>> will never get a 4.2 Release.
>> Definitely!
>>
>> But I think the remaining release blockers are all valid for this
>> release. So we should now concentrate on them.
>>
> What really has me concerned at this point is that we have 253 issues that
> are tagged for 4.2.0. This is an unwieldy number of issues to deal with
> given the resources that we have for QA.
Most of them are from the time when trunk=4.2.0
> I am just not sure where we would want to set the bar as far as reducing
> that 253 to a reasonable number.
Feel free to adjust them to trunk/4.5.0
We should concentrate on the Release Blocker. That is work enough.
Regards,
Matthias
>
> Regards,
> Keith
>
>
>
>> We need 4.2.0 as a basis for refreshed code and translations.
>>
>> Matthias
>>
>>
>>> Keith
>>>
>>>> Am 23.03.21 um 16:54 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>>>> Hi Jim,
>>>>>
>>>>> I would suggest we build the same language set as in Dev 2.
>>>>>
>>>>> That means 41+5 languages:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/devtools/build-scripts/
> 4.2.0-
>>> Dev2/wntmsci/Pack-dev.lst
>>>>> @Mechtilde: What about new Pootle templates? We had a lot of string
>>>>> changes...
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 23.03.21 um 16:03 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>>>>> In an effort to save some time and resources, can we confirm on
>>>>>> whether or not we are building the full language set?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mar 20, 2021, at 2:04 PM, Matthias Seidel
>>>>>>> <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have created the directory structure for Dev3:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.2.0-Dev3/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Am 17.03.21 um 18:00 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>>>>>>> Hi Arrigo,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Am 16.03.21 um 21:53 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori:
>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 04:26:53PM +0100, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The subject says it all... ;-)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> No exact time frame, but we could include a full set of updated
>>>>>>>>>> translations from Pootle here.
>>>>>>>>> I would also like to have some pull requests merged, if possible!
>>>>>>>> Definitely!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The next step would be to solve the Release Blocker for 4.2.0 and
>>>>>>>> release it! ;-)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> And I am still tackling bug #126869. Man, UNO is... big!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org For
>>>>>> additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org For
>>> additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>
Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?
Posted by "Keith N. McKenna" <kn...@apache.org>.
On Tue, 29 Jun 2021 11:54:13 +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Hi Keith,
>
> Am 26.06.21 um 19:01 schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
>> On Sat, 26 Jun 2021 16:55:52 +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>
>>> 3 month later, I assume there is no interest in releasing a Dev3?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Matthias
>>>
>> Mathias;
>> Given the changes in Bugzilla I believe that it is time for a dev 3
>> build.
> Dev3 would be a "snapshot" of what is in our code. We could release it
> at any time. Maybe we want to do a bit of cleanup before and update the
> translations.
>> We really also need to either start working on the Release Blockers or
>> seriously look at pushing some of them off to a later release or we
>> will never get a 4.2 Release.
>
> Definitely!
>
> But I think the remaining release blockers are all valid for this
> release. So we should now concentrate on them.
>
What really has me concerned at this point is that we have 253 issues that
are tagged for 4.2.0. This is an unwieldy number of issues to deal with
given the resources that we have for QA.
I am just not sure where we would want to set the bar as far as reducing
that 253 to a reasonable number.
Regards,
Keith
> We need 4.2.0 as a basis for refreshed code and translations.
>
> Matthias
>
>
>> Keith
>>
>>> Am 23.03.21 um 16:54 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>>> Hi Jim,
>>>>
>>>> I would suggest we build the same language set as in Dev 2.
>>>>
>>>> That means 41+5 languages:
>>>>
>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/devtools/build-scripts/
4.2.0-
>> Dev2/wntmsci/Pack-dev.lst
>>>> @Mechtilde: What about new Pootle templates? We had a lot of string
>>>> changes...
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Matthias
>>>>
>>>> Am 23.03.21 um 16:03 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>>>> In an effort to save some time and resources, can we confirm on
>>>>> whether or not we are building the full language set?
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mar 20, 2021, at 2:04 PM, Matthias Seidel
>>>>>> <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have created the directory structure for Dev3:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.2.0-Dev3/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Am 17.03.21 um 18:00 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>>>>>> Hi Arrigo,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Am 16.03.21 um 21:53 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori:
>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 04:26:53PM +0100, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The subject says it all... ;-)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> No exact time frame, but we could include a full set of updated
>>>>>>>>> translations from Pootle here.
>>>>>>>> I would also like to have some pull requests merged, if possible!
>>>>>>> Definitely!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The next step would be to solve the Release Blocker for 4.2.0 and
>>>>>>> release it! ;-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And I am still tackling bug #126869. Man, UNO is... big!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org For
>>>>> additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org For
>> additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?
Posted by Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de>.
Hi Keith,
Am 26.06.21 um 19:01 schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
> On Sat, 26 Jun 2021 16:55:52 +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>
>> 3 month later, I assume there is no interest in releasing a Dev3?
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Matthias
>>
> Mathias;
> Given the changes in Bugzilla I believe that it is time for a dev 3 build.
Dev3 would be a "snapshot" of what is in our code. We could release it
at any time. Maybe we want to do a bit of cleanup before and update the
translations.
> We really also need to either start working on the Release Blockers or
> seriously look at pushing some of them off to a later release or we will
> never get a 4.2 Release.
Definitely!
But I think the remaining release blockers are all valid for this
release. So we should now concentrate on them.
We need 4.2.0 as a basis for refreshed code and translations.
Matthias
>
> Keith
>
>> Am 23.03.21 um 16:54 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>> Hi Jim,
>>>
>>> I would suggest we build the same language set as in Dev 2.
>>>
>>> That means 41+5 languages:
>>>
>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/devtools/build-scripts/4.2.0-
> Dev2/wntmsci/Pack-dev.lst
>>> @Mechtilde: What about new Pootle templates? We had a lot of string
>>> changes...
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Matthias
>>>
>>> Am 23.03.21 um 16:03 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>>> In an effort to save some time and resources, can we confirm on
>>>> whether or not we are building the full language set?
>>>>
>>>>> On Mar 20, 2021, at 2:04 PM, Matthias Seidel
>>>>> <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> I have created the directory structure for Dev3:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.2.0-Dev3/
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 17.03.21 um 18:00 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>>>>> Hi Arrigo,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Am 16.03.21 um 21:53 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori:
>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 04:26:53PM +0100, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The subject says it all... ;-)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No exact time frame, but we could include a full set of updated
>>>>>>>> translations from Pootle here.
>>>>>>> I would also like to have some pull requests merged, if possible!
>>>>>> Definitely!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The next step would be to solve the Release Blocker for 4.2.0 and
>>>>>> release it! ;-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And I am still tackling bug #126869. Man, UNO is... big!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org For
>>>> additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>
Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?
Posted by "Keith N. McKenna" <kn...@apache.org>.
On Sat, 26 Jun 2021 16:55:52 +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> 3 month later, I assume there is no interest in releasing a Dev3?
>
> Regards,
>
> Matthias
>
Mathias;
Given the changes in Bugzilla I believe that it is time for a dev 3 build.
We really also need to either start working on the Release Blockers or
seriously look at pushing some of them off to a later release or we will
never get a 4.2 Release.
Keith
> Am 23.03.21 um 16:54 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>> Hi Jim,
>>
>> I would suggest we build the same language set as in Dev 2.
>>
>> That means 41+5 languages:
>>
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/devtools/build-scripts/4.2.0-
Dev2/wntmsci/Pack-dev.lst
>>
>> @Mechtilde: What about new Pootle templates? We had a lot of string
>> changes...
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Matthias
>>
>> Am 23.03.21 um 16:03 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>> In an effort to save some time and resources, can we confirm on
>>> whether or not we are building the full language set?
>>>
>>>> On Mar 20, 2021, at 2:04 PM, Matthias Seidel
>>>> <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> I have created the directory structure for Dev3:
>>>>
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.2.0-Dev3/
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Matthias
>>>>
>>>> Am 17.03.21 um 18:00 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>>>> Hi Arrigo,
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 16.03.21 um 21:53 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori:
>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 04:26:53PM +0100, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The subject says it all... ;-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No exact time frame, but we could include a full set of updated
>>>>>>> translations from Pootle here.
>>>>>> I would also like to have some pull requests merged, if possible!
>>>>> Definitely!
>>>>>
>>>>> The next step would be to solve the Release Blocker for 4.2.0 and
>>>>> release it! ;-)
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>
>>>>>> And I am still tackling bug #126869. Man, UNO is... big!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org For
>>> additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>>>
>>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?
Posted by Carl Marcum <cm...@apache.org>.
Hi Matthias,
On 6/27/21 12:17 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Hi Carl,
>
> Am 27.06.21 um 13:16 schrieb Carl Marcum:
>> Hi Matthias,
>>
>> On 6/26/21 10:55 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>> 3 month later, I assume there is no interest in releasing a Dev3?
>> That's okay with me.
> I hope you are OK with doing a dev3? ;-)
Sorry, yes I'm okay with a dev3 :)
Best regards,
Carl
>
> Regards,
>
> Matthias
>
>> Best regards,
>> Carl
>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Matthias
>>>
>>> Am 23.03.21 um 16:54 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>>> Hi Jim,
>>>>
>>>> I would suggest we build the same language set as in Dev 2.
>>>>
>>>> That means 41+5 languages:
>>>>
>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/devtools/build-scripts/4.2.0-Dev2/wntmsci/Pack-dev.lst
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> @Mechtilde: What about new Pootle templates? We had a lot of string
>>>> changes...
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Matthias
>>>>
>>>> Am 23.03.21 um 16:03 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>>>> In an effort to save some time and resources, can we confirm on
>>>>> whether or not we are building the full language set?
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mar 20, 2021, at 2:04 PM, Matthias Seidel
>>>>>> <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have created the directory structure for Dev3:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.2.0-Dev3/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Am 17.03.21 um 18:00 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>>>>>> Hi Arrigo,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Am 16.03.21 um 21:53 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori:
>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 04:26:53PM +0100, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The subject says it all... ;-)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> No exact time frame, but we could include a full set of updated
>>>>>>>>> translations from Pootle here.
>>>>>>>> I would also like to have some pull requests merged, if possible!
>>>>>>> Definitely!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The next step would be to solve the Release Blocker for 4.2.0 and
>>>>>>> release it! ;-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And I am still tackling bug #126869. Man, UNO is... big!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?
Posted by Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de>.
Hi Carl,
Am 27.06.21 um 13:16 schrieb Carl Marcum:
> Hi Matthias,
>
> On 6/26/21 10:55 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>> 3 month later, I assume there is no interest in releasing a Dev3?
>
> That's okay with me.
I hope you are OK with doing a dev3? ;-)
Regards,
Matthias
>
> Best regards,
> Carl
>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Matthias
>>
>> Am 23.03.21 um 16:54 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>> Hi Jim,
>>>
>>> I would suggest we build the same language set as in Dev 2.
>>>
>>> That means 41+5 languages:
>>>
>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/devtools/build-scripts/4.2.0-Dev2/wntmsci/Pack-dev.lst
>>>
>>>
>>> @Mechtilde: What about new Pootle templates? We had a lot of string
>>> changes...
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Matthias
>>>
>>> Am 23.03.21 um 16:03 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>>> In an effort to save some time and resources, can we confirm on
>>>> whether or not we are building the full language set?
>>>>
>>>>> On Mar 20, 2021, at 2:04 PM, Matthias Seidel
>>>>> <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> I have created the directory structure for Dev3:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.2.0-Dev3/
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 17.03.21 um 18:00 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>>>>> Hi Arrigo,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Am 16.03.21 um 21:53 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori:
>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 04:26:53PM +0100, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The subject says it all... ;-)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No exact time frame, but we could include a full set of updated
>>>>>>>> translations from Pootle here.
>>>>>>> I would also like to have some pull requests merged, if possible!
>>>>>> Definitely!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The next step would be to solve the Release Blocker for 4.2.0 and
>>>>>> release it! ;-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And I am still tackling bug #126869. Man, UNO is... big!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>
Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?
Posted by Carl Marcum <cm...@apache.org>.
Hi Matthias,
On 6/26/21 10:55 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> 3 month later, I assume there is no interest in releasing a Dev3?
That's okay with me.
Best regards,
Carl
>
> Regards,
>
> Matthias
>
> Am 23.03.21 um 16:54 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>> Hi Jim,
>>
>> I would suggest we build the same language set as in Dev 2.
>>
>> That means 41+5 languages:
>>
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/devtools/build-scripts/4.2.0-Dev2/wntmsci/Pack-dev.lst
>>
>> @Mechtilde: What about new Pootle templates? We had a lot of string
>> changes...
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Matthias
>>
>> Am 23.03.21 um 16:03 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>> In an effort to save some time and resources, can we confirm on whether or not we are building the full language set?
>>>
>>>> On Mar 20, 2021, at 2:04 PM, Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> I have created the directory structure for Dev3:
>>>>
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.2.0-Dev3/
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Matthias
>>>>
>>>> Am 17.03.21 um 18:00 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>>>> Hi Arrigo,
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 16.03.21 um 21:53 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori:
>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 04:26:53PM +0100, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The subject says it all... ;-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No exact time frame, but we could include a full set of updated
>>>>>>> translations from Pootle here.
>>>>>> I would also like to have some pull requests merged, if possible!
>>>>> Definitely!
>>>>>
>>>>> The next step would be to solve the Release Blocker for 4.2.0 and
>>>>> release it! ;-)
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>
>>>>>> And I am still tackling bug #126869. Man, UNO is... big!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>>>
>>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?
Posted by Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de>.
3 month later, I assume there is no interest in releasing a Dev3?
Regards,
Matthias
Am 23.03.21 um 16:54 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
> Hi Jim,
>
> I would suggest we build the same language set as in Dev 2.
>
> That means 41+5 languages:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/devtools/build-scripts/4.2.0-Dev2/wntmsci/Pack-dev.lst
>
> @Mechtilde: What about new Pootle templates? We had a lot of string
> changes...
>
> Regards,
>
> Matthias
>
> Am 23.03.21 um 16:03 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> In an effort to save some time and resources, can we confirm on whether or not we are building the full language set?
>>
>>> On Mar 20, 2021, at 2:04 PM, Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I have created the directory structure for Dev3:
>>>
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.2.0-Dev3/
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Matthias
>>>
>>> Am 17.03.21 um 18:00 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>>> Hi Arrigo,
>>>>
>>>> Am 16.03.21 um 21:53 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori:
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 04:26:53PM +0100, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The subject says it all... ;-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No exact time frame, but we could include a full set of updated
>>>>>> translations from Pootle here.
>>>>> I would also like to have some pull requests merged, if possible!
>>>> Definitely!
>>>>
>>>> The next step would be to solve the Release Blocker for 4.2.0 and
>>>> release it! ;-)
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Matthias
>>>>
>>>>> And I am still tackling bug #126869. Man, UNO is... big!
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>>
>>
Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?
Posted by Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de>.
Hi Jim,
I would suggest we build the same language set as in Dev 2.
That means 41+5 languages:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/devtools/build-scripts/4.2.0-Dev2/wntmsci/Pack-dev.lst
@Mechtilde: What about new Pootle templates? We had a lot of string
changes...
Regards,
Matthias
Am 23.03.21 um 16:03 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> In an effort to save some time and resources, can we confirm on whether or not we are building the full language set?
>
>> On Mar 20, 2021, at 2:04 PM, Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have created the directory structure for Dev3:
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.2.0-Dev3/
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Matthias
>>
>> Am 17.03.21 um 18:00 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>> Hi Arrigo,
>>>
>>> Am 16.03.21 um 21:53 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori:
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 04:26:53PM +0100, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> The subject says it all... ;-)
>>>>>
>>>>> No exact time frame, but we could include a full set of updated
>>>>> translations from Pootle here.
>>>> I would also like to have some pull requests merged, if possible!
>>> Definitely!
>>>
>>> The next step would be to solve the Release Blocker for 4.2.0 and
>>> release it! ;-)
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Matthias
>>>
>>>> And I am still tackling bug #126869. Man, UNO is... big!
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>
>
Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
In an effort to save some time and resources, can we confirm on whether or not we are building the full language set?
> On Mar 20, 2021, at 2:04 PM, Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have created the directory structure for Dev3:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.2.0-Dev3/
>
> Regards,
>
> Matthias
>
> Am 17.03.21 um 18:00 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>> Hi Arrigo,
>>
>> Am 16.03.21 um 21:53 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 04:26:53PM +0100, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> The subject says it all... ;-)
>>>>
>>>> No exact time frame, but we could include a full set of updated
>>>> translations from Pootle here.
>>> I would also like to have some pull requests merged, if possible!
>> Definitely!
>>
>> The next step would be to solve the Release Blocker for 4.2.0 and
>> release it! ;-)
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Matthias
>>
>>> And I am still tackling bug #126869. Man, UNO is... big!
>>>
>>> Regards,
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?
Posted by Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de>.
Hi all,
I have created the directory structure for Dev3:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.2.0-Dev3/
Regards,
Matthias
Am 17.03.21 um 18:00 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
> Hi Arrigo,
>
> Am 16.03.21 um 21:53 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 04:26:53PM +0100, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> The subject says it all... ;-)
>>>
>>> No exact time frame, but we could include a full set of updated
>>> translations from Pootle here.
>> I would also like to have some pull requests merged, if possible!
> Definitely!
>
> The next step would be to solve the Release Blocker for 4.2.0 and
> release it! ;-)
>
> Regards,
>
> Matthias
>
>> And I am still tackling bug #126869. Man, UNO is... big!
>>
>> Regards,
Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?
Posted by Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de>.
Hi Arrigo,
Am 16.03.21 um 21:53 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 04:26:53PM +0100, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> The subject says it all... ;-)
>>
>> No exact time frame, but we could include a full set of updated
>> translations from Pootle here.
> I would also like to have some pull requests merged, if possible!
Definitely!
The next step would be to solve the Release Blocker for 4.2.0 and
release it! ;-)
Regards,
Matthias
>
> And I am still tackling bug #126869. Man, UNO is... big!
>
> Regards,
Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?
Posted by Arrigo Marchiori <ar...@yahoo.it.INVALID>.
Hello,
On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 04:26:53PM +0100, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The subject says it all... ;-)
>
> No exact time frame, but we could include a full set of updated
> translations from Pootle here.
I would also like to have some pull requests merged, if possible!
And I am still tackling bug #126869. Man, UNO is... big!
Regards,
--
Arrigo
http://rigo.altervista.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org